It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

MYSTERY: Awan Brothers Court Date Disappears From Calendar After Being Postponed Twice

page: 1
33

log in

join
share:
+9 more 
posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   
thegatewaypundit.com...


Another day, another plot twist to the ‘Awan Brothers,’ story. Daily Caller reporter Luke Rosiak discovered Thursday that the Awan brothers’ next court date, scheduled for January 8th, 2018, disappeared from the calendar


Just a shot in the dark...

He turned and cut a deal?




posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

A Democratic aid getting away with something?

It's not like he put classified info on and unsecured server in a basement of a residential home after being briefed on handling classified info.

So touchy.



posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

Like DWS said....

"There WILL be *consequences*" !

Sure possible "deal" and/or connected "co-indictments" coming.




posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: seasonal

But he may have passed classified material to spys.




posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 06:25 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Like ICBM tech to the Chinese for campaign $$$?



posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 07:21 PM
link   
More like thumb drives to Assange.



posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 07:45 PM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

I am not too concerned about them cutting a deal if it is just a shorter prison sentence. I want everyone who allowed and then covered up what was happening and/or used what was happening to go down.

These people who are using the government to line their pockets at the expense of the people they represent need prison time. And perhaps as a result we will have a major portion of the population who wakes up and says ENOUGH.



posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

Yes, the fraud committed and still being committed against the American people by these pseudo-elites requires full accountability.



posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 08:27 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I posted this in another thread you might want to check out

sathearn DHFabian • an hour ago By way of further clarification of important distinctions, there are actually three or four leaks (not hacks) in question: 1. A DNC staffer (Seth Rich) who collected files in late May, 2016 (last DNC emails dated May 25), passed a sample of them to Wikileaks, and offered them access to a larger set through a secure dropbox link in exchange for money (according to what Seymour Hersh claimed in an audio recording obtained and published without his permission was what an FBI report he had been given access to said). Julian Assange announced the forthcoming release on June 12, 2016, and actually released them on July 21 or thereabouts. 2. The Guccifer 2.0 persona who suddenly burst on the scene on June 15, 2016, claimed to be the Wikileaks source, and released a sample of 5 DNC documents including one titled "Trump Opposition Research" containing what are evidently deliberately inserted "Russian fingerprints" in the metadata of these documents - these fingerprints were immediately "exposed" by the DNC-paid firm Crowdstrike, a prime suspect in the fabrication (see Adam Carter's research). 3. The Guccifer 2.0 claimed "hack" of the NGP-VAN files on July 5, 2016 and released on September 13, 2016.

The Forensicator, VIPS and particularly William Binney have adduced strong evidence that these files were transferred locally on that July 5 date to a zip drive, not over the internet. 4. The Wikileaks dump of Podesta emails on October 7, 2016. Former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray claims to have met the source in Washington, DC in September 2016 (though denies having been personally involved in transferring the files to Wikileaks), and his careful words to Scott Horton strongly imply that the source was a US government or intelligence official with legal access to the files because of John (or rather Tony) Podesta's status as a registered agent of Saudi Arabia. Murray also urged us not to conclude that the Podesta leak had the same source as the DNC leak, or to conclude that both cases involved government officials or that both involved DNC insiders. (All dates here from memory.) In all cases these were evidently leaks by insiders, and not remote hacks
thread www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 28 2017 @ 08:34 PM
link   
Military court now. Trump was surrounded by Marines in Florida meaning we are already under martial law. All the moon boots are leaving the federal courts and going down to gitmo son.
edit on 28-12-2017 by dntwastetime because: sp



posted on Dec, 29 2017 @ 10:05 AM
link   
a reply to: dntwastetime

He is a foreign national, maybe Awan is headed to Gitmo.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 05:08 AM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
www.foxnews.com...

“Whatever happened to this Pakistani guy who worked with the DNC?”
- President Trump to New York Times



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 05:50 AM
link   
I haven't explored this site yet but it looks interesting.

Maybe some info can be found out?

All Federal Inspector General reports in one place! lol

oversight.gov...


edit on 12 30 2017 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:24 AM
link   
Well, if they cut a deal, he'd better be wrapped in bubble wrap and staying in the White House.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 10:53 AM
link   
Maybe this is why DJT brought attention to it per Fox News



Trump draws attention to case against ex-Dem IT aide Imran Awan



“Whatever happened to them?” Trump continued. “With the two servers that they broke up into a million pieces? Whatever happened to him?”



posted on Jan, 7 2018 @ 10:29 AM
link   
Update, explanation from the Feds.

The official explanation for this postponement from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia says:

Since the last status conference, the government has continued to engage in substantial discussions with counsel for the defendants regarding complex discovery issues and other legal issues in this case, in particular issues surrounding claims of attorney-client privilege being raised by defendant Imran Awan. Regarding those issues, the government has provided defendants with additional discovery, which they continue to review and analyze. As such, all of the parties in this case are respectfully requesting additional time to address these issues with their clients and with the government

www.forbes.com...

edit on 7-1-2018 by EvidenceNibbler because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 7 2018 @ 10:38 AM
link   
Wasserman Schutz has friends in high places remember?





top topics



 
33

log in

join