Sooooo, I couldn't figure out what you're referencing about me "ignoring the past" through all of your direct and passive-aggressive ad hominems. Care
to share why you think that I'm "ignoring the past" just because I disagree with your rant?
Here's a nice rundown of buzzwords and phrases that you think make your point more valid:
- "undue amount of corruption higher up"
- "ignoring the past"
- "our rulers"
- "ignore everything if it makes you feel better"
- "I prefer to learn from mistakes"
- "it's important to know who's running things"
But they don't make your point more valid, they make you sound like a buzzword fanboy with nothing much of substance to say.
Here's the crux of your comment to me:
I disagree with my tax dollars paying this company to produce these targets for our law enforcement because they offend me. Since you disagree
with me, you are someone who ignores history, and I will imply that you are an unlearned individual who doesn't care about anything that affects the
citizens of this country.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but all of that is absolute nonsense.
We get it--you don't like the targets, and you're using them to create/justify some loony conspiracy theory that you have.
The police departments are hiring ex soldiers now,and they have a soldier mentality,yes I'm sure if a black,hispanic or any other race mouths off and
resist,they revert to old ways,used to have an extensive psychological tests for police officers,mostly big citys,where I live the police and Sheriff
act very professional,they are very personable
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.