It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The only parts that aren't substantiated are the prostitutes claims and Cohen being in Prague
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: burgerbuddy
And the part where Trump paid the russians 12 million bucks for dirt on hillary.
Proof?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler
Then it seems you have your answer.
"The FBI, NSA and CIA disagree, as do Igor Diveykin, Paul Mannafort, Araz Agalarov, Emin Agalarov, Mikhail Kalugin and all the supporting evidence to back up the claims that the Kremlin groomed Trump.
The only parts that aren't substantiated are the prostitutes claims and Cohen being in Prague"
Happy now? This thread is pointless?
The claim on that post that all of it has been substantiated except Cohen is a sufficient answer for you?
originally posted by: onthedownlow
a reply to: Grambler
I think the real issue here is that if large parts of the dossier are found to be fabricated, the document as a whole is corrupt. We know that the dossier was created as a smear tactic, the fabricated portions help to ferrit that out. At this point, the dossier can only be a detractor for alternative sources- so I fully believe any talk of corroboration is moot, the well has essentially been poisoned.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Grambler
So ats members are getting the idea that parts of the dosser are corroborated from the intelligence community and not the media.
And they are answering your question :
The only parts that aren't substantiated are the prostitutes claims and Cohen being in Prague
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: onthedownlow
Unless corroborated items lead the investigation(s) in important avenues. The dossier probably is not considered evidence, but it could well have some bread crumbs to follow. Or not.
What's the hurry to find out?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler
The claim on that post that all of it has been substantiated except Cohen is a sufficient answer for you?
No.
But then, I'm not expecting "sufficient" answers from anyone on ATS in regard to the investigation(s).
Why are you?
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler
Here was one from today I saw.
So, instead of inquiring of that member, you decided to create a thread?
I did ask that member.
I have asked many members who say this.
I was given no response.
sub·stan·tive
adjective
ˈsəbstən(t)iv,səbˈstan(t)iv/Submit
1.
having a firm basis in reality and therefore important, meaningful, or considerable.
FBI and Justice Department officials have told congressional investigators in recent days that they have not been able to verify or corroborate the substantive allegations of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign outlined in the Trump dossier.