It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What parts of the dossier have been corroborated?

page: 2
40
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 09:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler




Here was one from today I saw.

So, instead of inquiring of that member, you decided to create a thread?


I did ask that member.

I have asked many members who say this.

I was given no response.

And you expect something different because you started a thread?
As I said, I don't think you're going to get an answer here.

edit on 12/26/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler




A great deal of it has already been corroborated,

Your right some people are saying this.




I will not name names.

Why not? After all the unspoken motto of ats is ,"Back up your claims."



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


1. As part of the justification for the ongoing investigation into trumps team and russian collusion, and perhaps the crucial first step.

2. As part of the media's attack on trump.

3. Most importantly, as a possible reason for fisa warrants against trump team members (which would be the biggest poltical scandal in my lifetime)

Why don't you just say, get trump.

Thats like destroying the smoke and fire machine in the Wizard of Oz.

They'll just build another one.


+10 more 
posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:03 PM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

The silliest of them is convinced the entirety of the thing is legit including the urinating hookers.



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler




Here was one from today I saw.

So, instead of inquiring of that member, you decided to create a thread?


I did ask that member.

I have asked many members who say this.

I was given no response.

And you expect something different because you started a thread?
As I said, I don't think you're going to get an answer here.

I beat he gets answers if he names people. Those people will have to come defend their statement.
Or do you mean that those people have no way of knowing if corroboration is true or not?

If that's the case grambler it would seem that you have more of a beef with the media and less with the sheep that believe what the media tells them.
Because any talk of corroboration would have come from the media first.



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage


The investigation is ongoing. Don'cha know.

Endless war, endless debt and endless investigations.

the only thing worse is bringing it here.


+5 more 
posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

So, instead of inquiring of that member, in that thread, you decided to create a thread?


This Dossier is obviously a touchy subject with you, Phage. Freud would be all over you mang.



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:05 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

I haven't even read it. But I'm not the topic.

The OP has asked for something that no one on ATS is going to be able to provide.



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: scraedtosleep

The silliest of them is convinced the entirety of the thing is legit including the urinating hookers.


That is not surprising at all...
& quite frankly expected, in my opinion.

In fact I’d already guessed that.


I’m willing to bet there isn’t a single other person doing so.



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

I haven't even read it. But I'm not the topic.

The OP has asked for something that no one on ATS is going to be able to provide.


Then folk should probably STFU about it having any bearing on reality, huh? However, I say investigate and let the chips fall where they may. All roads are leading to the past admin(s.)
edit on 26-12-2017 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:08 PM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep




If that's the case grambler it would seem that you have more of a beef with the media and less with the sheep that believe what the media tells them.

My beef is more with stupid threads.

I believe that Adam Schiff has said that there is corroboration of items in the dossier. I wouldn't expect him to enumerate them.



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

I think the part where russia paid Trump for 20% of something.

And the part where Trump paid the russians 12 million bucks for dirt on hillary.

Other than that, I'm at a loss.




posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT




Then folk should probably STFU about it, huh?


That would suit me.
Especially those who think the investigation(s) should be shut down.



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:11 PM
link   
"The FBI, NSA and CIA disagree, as do Igor Diveykin, Paul Mannafort, Araz Agalarov, Emin Agalarov, Mikhail Kalugin and all the supporting evidence to back up the claims that the Kremlin groomed Trump.

The only parts that aren't substantiated are the prostitutes claims and Cohen being in Prague"

"Who has admitted the dossier is a load of BS? There appears to be some parts that have not been corroborated, and other parts that have."

"Also, it does not matter if some of the dossier is false. What matters is what has been corroborated and it appears some of it has been"

"Actually the CIA and FBI have both said it's about 80% true" (not quite what I am talking about, but still)

"So everyone is clear, the F.B.I. has verified some of the information in the dossier"

I'm this thread where some of the above comments were made, you can see me asking the question I ask in the op, and getting no response.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This same thing is repaeyed over and over in discussions about the dossier.

So I am giving people a chance to show what parts of the dossier have been corroborated.



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Grambler

Who has even said it?

You should just go ahead and call out by name the people your referring to.

I can't remember anyone that said this but I would like an answer to your question if they did.



Don't be silly. You know who has said it many times.




posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:12 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical




urinating hookers

Not even the msm believes this part. Do they?



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Then it seems you have your answer.

"The FBI, NSA and CIA disagree, as do Igor Diveykin, Paul Mannafort, Araz Agalarov, Emin Agalarov, Mikhail Kalugin and all the supporting evidence to back up the claims that the Kremlin groomed Trump.

The only parts that aren't substantiated are the prostitutes claims and Cohen being in Prague"


Happy now? This thread is pointless?

edit on 12/26/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:15 PM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy




And the part where Trump paid the russians 12 million bucks for dirt on hillary.

Proof?



posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:15 PM
link   
I think the whole Dossier is verified.


as a hoax





posted on Dec, 26 2017 @ 10:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: scraedtosleep




If that's the case grambler it would seem that you have more of a beef with the media and less with the sheep that believe what the media tells them.

My beef is more with stupid threads.

I believe that Adam Schiff has said that there is corroboration of items in the dossier. I wouldn't expect him to enumerate them.



Pencil neck has been yapping for a year and has not come up with anything except leaking the Trump jr interview.




new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join