It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

McCabe to retire early next year

page: 3
32
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 06:53 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

His testimony can only hurt trump.
The man is not on trial for God's sake.
His testimony has nothing to do with his pension and to suggest otherwise is ignorant.
edit on 12242017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 06:59 AM
link   
Trump could fire him now and deny him his pension. Wonder why he's not???
Could it be because it would look like another coverup??? You bet...



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 07:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: whywhynot
Just looked, he will be 50 when he “retires”. Hmmmm


Hmmmmmm? What is that, the sound you make when you think you think you’re on to something or what?

I retired in 2005 at age 48 with 32 yrs of service because I started working at age 16. I retired with a full pension and a Cadillac insurance plan and I haven’t worked a day since. My health insurance plan has no deductibles, very low co-pays for office visits and covers 100% of most everything else. Did I mention that I don’t even have to pay premiums for my coverage? Wasn’t a government job either. Hmmmmmmm!

My father also retired with full pension at age 48 and so did several other people I knew during my career as a union longshoreman.

Just goes to show what companies can actually afford when they’re not left unchecked to screw their employees at every turn in their quest to improve profit margins for their shareholders.

FYI, unfounded suspicion is the product of a guilty conscience.



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 08:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Trump could fire him now and deny him his pension. Wonder why he's not???
Could it be because it would look like another coverup??? You bet...


Or, he is cooperating.



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 08:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: whywhynot
Just looked, he will be 50 when he “retires”. Hmmmm


Hmmmmmm? What is that, the sound you make when you think you think you’re on to something or what?

I retired in 2005 at age 48 with 32 yrs of service because I started working at age 16. I retired with a full pension and a Cadillac insurance plan and I haven’t worked a day since. My health insurance plan has no deductibles, very low co-pays for office visits and covers 100% of most everything else. Did I mention that I don’t even have to pay premiums for my coverage? Wasn’t a government job either. Hmmmmmmm!

My father also retired with full pension at age 48 and so did several other people I knew during my career as a union longshoreman.

Just goes to show what companies can actually afford when they’re not left unchecked to screw their employees at every turn in their quest to improve profit margins for their shareholders.

FYI, unfounded suspicion is the product of a guilty conscience.


I didn’t say it was impossible. I just pointed it out. It is unusual considering his senior level.

Riddles are solved by looking for clues that stand out and then fit together.

Blindly falling thru life leaves one bumping into things.
edit on 24-12-2017 by whywhynot because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 08:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Flatfish

I got a similar deal from the teamsters union.
Health insurance, dental, vision even legal assistance coverage if I ever need a lawyer.and a pension. Not a fortune but still. I retired early but not from the union job. I left there in 91. Still got those benefits when I turned fifty five I think. I just started collecting this this year.



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 08:25 AM
link   
a reply to: whywhynot

He testified that Comey was telling the truth. I don't know. Who would he be cooperating with? You think he's helping trump with his discredit half of Washington campaign? I seriously doubt that.



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 08:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Hahahaaaa...I see you've already got somebody positively apoplectic with desperate, scrabbling rage over this thread. That is most amusing.

That also means you picked a winner, and we all should most certainly pay attention to Mr McCabe rather than ignore him now that he's announced his retirement. And from what I've been reading lately, this little drama isn't near over with regard to his testimony, and the MSM is simply spinning a bull# fairy tale ending in a pathetic attempt to prolong the inevitable Big Reveal incoming...so the screeching and babbling/near-hysterical denials actually coincide nicely with that information.

I'm betting things are going to get a whole lot more interesting after the holidays are over. I don't think he's getting away with # in reality...unless he took a deal. But I just don't see that happening after he ditched on the hearings. Of course, it could just be eggnog and wishful thinking that makes me say that. We shall see.



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: tigertatzen

He didn't ditch the hearings he had a scheduling conflict but of course the alt right reports he ditched.
LOL
16 hours of answering questions and him confirming what James Comey testified to back in June isn't exactly ditching is it? I don't think they got out of him what you guys were hoping for.



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: tigertatzen

He didn't ditch the hearings he had a scheduling conflict but of course the alt right reports he ditched.
LOL
16 hours of answering questions and him confirming what James Comey testified to back in June isn't exactly ditching is it? I don't think they got out of him what you guys were hoping for.


Care to provide any sources for your claims? As far as i know it was a closed hearing. You sound pretty desperate. It's kinda adorable that you still think the Alt-Right is a real thing.



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 11:22 AM
link   
This is superb...




Trump just revealed more - McCabe was campaigning for Clinton!

edit on 24/12/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth


Hatch Act violation.

Lock him up!!




posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

McCabe is not even the intended target it's his wife and she is in deep. I bet the news outlets will be pretty busy after this weekend.



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 02:38 PM
link   
I don't have any inside info, but "what goes around, comes around". Flynn was steamrolled by threats against his son, as well as himself. So I won't be surprised it some legal dogs in Congress threaten McCabe, by going after his wife. Kind of Tit for Tattling. Screw Comey, he's yesterday's news. Someone should have at the least, set a rose on "Andy's Office"'s table, for that meeting of those conspirators. That's always been " SUB ROSA", or under the rose, where nothing is ever mentioned outside of the meeting.

All of these FBI "Flatfoots", were just soooo sure that Trump was going to get trampled, that they lost sight of good old Sub Rosa conspiracy rules. How many of you have also lost sight of the fact that the key operator in conspiracy, is PIRACY??

So, today, "ANDY", had to explain, "WAT WENT WONG", in his office, back in the Primary Campaign season of 2015. About nine months later, just like with poor little Suzie Wong, he darn well found out. BOO HOO! Better yet, "Andy's Office Party", was conducted on Dir. Comey's dime, and under his thumb. I"m thinking that there going to be a race to see who rats out whom, first. When the other Mom and Pop OP, namely the Ohr's, links directly to Fusion GPS, then the fur's going to fly.

What I believe is still in the wind, is who, how, and when, parachuted the Awan Bros. into their key DNC positions. And at least one, Awan boy was partying with Seth Rich, an hour or so, before Seth was murdered, walking home from that tavern. And this murder still has Ms. Donna Brazille spooked. And all of this went down right under the noses of some BIGLY, Wash. D.C. newspapers. One fine day, they will have to step up to the plate, or no one will take them serious anymore.

If you read John Le Carre', then this meeting in Andy's office counts as one of "Smiley's" gold seams. This was Le Carre' getting around his British Official Secrets oath, as it really means following a quartz, "stringer vein", of intelligence, rather than a gold seam in someone's trousers. All in all, Judicial Watch's finding out about that "meeting in Andy's Office" is one terrible breach of tradecraft on the part of those FBI "flatfoots". And I'm not making that term up, by a long shot. It's exactly how a BATFX agent described them to me, in Spokane, way back in 1969. The way to deal with the FBI, is to never underestimate their stupidity. They are only a "Wannabe" secret police apparatus. Most of their successful cases are either manufactured, or delivered to them, on a sterling silver platter.



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 02:46 PM
link   
a reply to: carpooler

Interesting.....very interesting....



posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyo congress under oath.lme

pray tell what do you think trump did wrong?
was it something he did before or after he took office?
you know he can only be impeached from office by congress.
and only under certain extreme conditions like lying to congress under oath.
firing comey was well within his powers because comey did underhanded stuff during his time as head of fbi.



posted on Dec, 25 2017 @ 01:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

His testimony can only hurt trump.
The man is not on trial for God's sake.
His testimony has nothing to do with his pension and to suggest otherwise is ignorant.


The only thing that is ignorant is your total disregard for the fact that whatever he said is causing more people to have to testify. I don't know if you have figured this out yet, but that doesn't look good for him. You can keep denying the facts all you want but this is not looking good for Mueller, or his bias team.



posted on Dec, 25 2017 @ 01:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: tigertatzen

He didn't ditch the hearings he had a scheduling conflict but of course the alt right reports he ditched.
LOL
16 hours of answering questions and him confirming what James Comey testified to back in June isn't exactly ditching is it? I don't think they got out of him what you guys were hoping for.


Considering James Comey lied to Congress and was a leaker, I don't think I'd believe too much about what James Comey says.



posted on Dec, 25 2017 @ 01:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot

He testified that Comey was telling the truth. I don't know. Who would he be cooperating with? You think he's helping trump with his discredit half of Washington campaign? I seriously doubt that.


So you're going to sit here and try to tell all of us that these politicians in Washington are incapable of lying? The facts are coming out, and the facts are that Obama and Hillary had the FBI and other government entities in the palm of their hand doing as they told them to. Give Trump one more year and there's going to be some people going to jail over this, big time. Why do you think Obama is running all over the world trying to talk to as many world leaders as he can? He needs help, but he won't get it.



posted on Dec, 25 2017 @ 07:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

He "ditched" because his inside sources were drying up like water in the Mojave Desert.





new topics

top topics



 
32
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join