posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 12:03 AM
Boy, that temple at the site sure is worn out from the weather. You can see the pillars and mantle, it almost matches other ones that I have seen on
the net carved from the soft sandstone. This one does not seem to have living quarters though, maybe they were sealed long ago or maybe they just had
low stone houses there like in other areas. It definitely looks like a very old archeological site.
I would make a bet it is going to be considered made by some hominen that lived long ago. I am not so sure that that is a sphinx, but they say the
sphinx originally had a different head on it and it was modified by a pharaoh to his likeness. That stone looks pretty soft, it almost looks like it
flowed over the side structure and left a deposit like calcium containing stone will do. Remember, all that cutting and grinding leaves a lot of
powdery sand to deal with.
The original sphinx, before it was remade is said to be much older than what it is said to be. There was water present there that eroded it, that
brings it's development back thousands of years. Maybe this was built by the same people.
They have a lot of old temples in India, some are carved into the rock too. I wonder what treasures these things will hold in the rooms they contain,
maybe they were already robbed. I doubt if any archeologist will properly investigate this, it would mean they have to rewrite the history of that
area and it will mean a lot of tourist dollars leaving some of the sites in Italy and Greece and areas like that. Actually India has way more
impressive stone buildings than in most of the pyramid areas. If I was going to go look at ancient structures I would go down there.