It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Inspector General Horowitz Investigating Strzok For Possible Hatch Act Breaches

page: 1
25

log in

join
share:
+5 more 
posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Inspector General is now investigating FBI agent Peter Strzok for possible Hatch Act violations !!

It's possible he was "campaigning" politically while "on the job".

I say yes he was.


BREAKING REPORT: Inspector General Horowitz Investigating Strzok For Possible Hatch Act Breaches


FBI agent Peter Strzok was removed from the Mueller witch hunt after anti-Trump text messages he sent to his mistress FBI lawyer Lisa Page were discovered.

Strzok was also one of the lead FBI agents on Hillary’s criminal email investigation which received ‘special status’ from the FBI.

The most damning message was an exchange revealing Strzok and Page discussed an ‘insurance policy,’ against a Trump presidency.
The kicker? Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe may have not only been privy to the conversation, but a part of it.







posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Peter Strzok - there is a hell of a lot more to that guy than we are being told.

for starters, this is not Peter Strzok.


We arent allowed to see what he looks like because
a) it was a pseudo name or
b) he's in many photos with Clinton and Lynch and it cannot be found out.



posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 10:07 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I guess we will have to wait and see if this is true.

Though I feel strzoks own text messages are more than enough to warrant an investigation.

Remember when Schumer chuckled that trump was making a mistake criticizing the Intel community because they had many ways of getting back at him?

Sounds like he knew that some in their were petty political operatives that would try to take trump down for their own reasons.

Some one should ask Schumer to clarify what he meant in light of strzoks talk of "insurance policies"



posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 10:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

yup i remember schumer talking about that aswell. i get the feeling theres infighting in these bureaus and it feels like the good guys might be turning the tide and who knows maybe that was more of a heads up to the trump team to play your cards right if your gonna push this direction cause its gonna get messy
edit on 19-12-2017 by TheScale because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 10:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
a reply to: xuenchen

Peter Strzok - there is a hell of a lot more to that guy than we are being told.

for starters, this is not Peter Strzok.


We arent allowed to see what he looks like because
a) it was a pseudo name or
b) he's in many photos with Clinton and Lynch and it cannot be found out.


Is this true??? If so, that needs to be looked into!



posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 10:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
a reply to: xuenchen

Peter Strzok - there is a hell of a lot more to that guy than we are being told.

for starters, this is not Peter Strzok.


We arent allowed to see what he looks like because
a) it was a pseudo name or
b) he's in many photos with Clinton and Lynch and it cannot be found out.


So, how are we supposed to know that picture isn't Peter Strozok? I went looking and could not find anything after reading your post.



posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 11:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
a reply to: xuenchen

Peter Strzok - there is a hell of a lot more to that guy than we are being told.

for starters, this is not Peter Strzok.


We arent allowed to see what he looks like because
a) it was a pseudo name or
b) he's in many photos with Clinton and Lynch and it cannot be found out.


So, how are we supposed to know that picture isn't Peter Strozok? I went looking and could not find anything after reading your post.


Me too.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 12:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
a reply to: xuenchen

Peter Strzok - there is a hell of a lot more to that guy than we are being told.

for starters, this is not Peter Strzok.


We arent allowed to see what he looks like because
a) it was a pseudo name or
b) he's in many photos with Clinton and Lynch and it cannot be found out.


So, how are we supposed to know that picture isn't Peter Strozok? I went looking and could not find anything after reading your post.


Me too.


Try Baidu.com

www.baidu.com...
edit on 1200000048392017-12-20T00:39:48-06:00394812am12 by musicismagic because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 01:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: musicismagic

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
a reply to: xuenchen

Peter Strzok - there is a hell of a lot more to that guy than we are being told.

for starters, this is not Peter Strzok.


We arent allowed to see what he looks like because
a) it was a pseudo name or
b) he's in many photos with Clinton and Lynch and it cannot be found out.


So, how are we supposed to know that picture isn't Peter Strozok? I went looking and could not find anything after reading your post.


Me too.


Try Baidu.com

www.baidu.com...


WTH ? is that chinas google ? looool



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 06:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Ill need a source or some backup of some sort to this statement




top topics



 
25

log in

join