It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Those Pentagon UFO Vids Have Shown Us A Few Realities.

page: 3
8
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 09:35 PM
link   
a reply to: makalit

Neutron. The words neutron.




posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: makalit

Dang skippy. I mean, this isn't "Mars Attacks" the movie. Real life, I think we have a pretty good defense for big time stuff... if we don't kill ourselves in the process. Then again, we may be the species of 'If I can't have it, nobody can.'



posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 10:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: filthyphilanthropist
a reply to: makalit

Dang skippy. I mean, this isn't "Mars Attacks" the movie. Real life, I think we have a pretty good defense for big time stuff... if we don't kill ourselves in the process. Then again, we may be the species of 'If I can't have it, nobody can.'

You don't understand that I've been trying to think of a way to defeat them for a while

Atomic bombs never hit me. But it would work.



posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 10:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: filthyphilanthropist





Most likely "on the verge" to us means "already have it" to them. I bet they are using this tech secretly already


A question.

Does The U.S. Government have secret and hidden manufacturing plants where these so called " Black Project " aircraft are manufactured ? Who supplies the raw materials, man power, assembly lines, electric and or gas power etc etc.

Area 51 i hear you shout.

I would doubt it.
lol, area 51. No, silly. Well, maybe. Black projects are nothing new, nor are their existence contested by any reasonable person. All significant countries have their own versions. Why would one country develope cutting edge military technology in the open to give potential enemies and rivals a leg up? Examples of black projects in the past that have come to light are the F-117 Nighthawk stealth attack aircraft and the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber.

My cousin is a rocket scientist who worked secret projects for DARPA (I think) maybe some other department. He only ever was able/willing to tell me about one project he worked on due to the secret nature of the others. Anyway, he at one point worked in an underground facility somewhere, and was there for I think months at a time. And don't take my word for it because how are you to know if I'm being honost? There are plenty of reputable sources you can find to descrive similar things.

Yes, super top secret "black projects" exist. Have they worked on invisibility cloaking? My guess is yes, but who knows. I'm willing to bet that they at least have some sort of working prototype even if it is not ready for practical use. Maybe not.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 12:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: makalit

originally posted by: filthyphilanthropist
a reply to: makalit

Dang skippy. I mean, this isn't "Mars Attacks" the movie. Real life, I think we have a pretty good defense for big time stuff... if we don't kill ourselves in the process. Then again, we may be the species of 'If I can't have it, nobody can.'

You don't understand that I've been trying to think of a way to defeat them for a while

Atomic bombs never hit me. But it would work.
Well then fret not. Personally, I doubt that we will face an ET invasion anytime remotely soon if ever (if they actually exist), but truly one never knows. We could face an invasion tomorrow.

I can only believe that if that happened it would be more like Falling Skies, Battle Over LA or District 9 (I know, not an invasion) rather than a War of the Worlds or Independance Day. There would be boots on the ground so to speak. Humans are born warriors, and we are resilient like cock roaches. Death from above isn't enough to take us out without also harming the resources they came to collect... and bullets sting no matter what it is especially the right bullets.

So the videos referenced by the OP show some pretty advanced tech. OK. They still have to come down here, and that's where we'll have them. We are the animal with a million weapons. Scorpians have stingers. Well so do we. And we are rowdy. Plus, we are willing to kill ourselves to take out the enemy.

I'm not saying we would win, but we can give enough hell to maybe make them re-think an ET occupation.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 12:53 AM
link   
We could never shoot their ships,

the only way to defeat them is to blow up the Earth.
Sure they can avoid all of our missles, because they are personally geared to defend themselves.
One thing they aren't geared to defend, is anything not themself.

If we blow up the world, they won't know how to not, and they will lose what they wanted.
edit on 20-12-2017 by makalit because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 03:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: alldaylong

I guess you have not understood that the continental US seems to be the fly over ground for most triangles. Why is that?
I guess you have not read an account about a triangle witnessed near Ft. Hood, Texas where the observer was able to see through his rifle scope a marked "RESCUE" door on the front of the craft?

.


High power scope or really slow aircraft then again another answer could be BS



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 04:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: shawmanfromny
a reply to: gortex

This craft out maneuvered our own jets and nearly slowed to a complete stop in midair and rotated while being pursued. .


It could appear like that simply due to it's orientation and direction relative to the camera.

Here are a couple of examples when in your car on a freeway/motorway a doing about 60 mph looking straight ahead it doesn't seem fast look out a side window and everything whizzes by although your speed hasn't change.

It's the the same when filming/photographing something, if at a track a car or motorbike is traveling towards or away from me I can use a slower shutter speed to freeze it than when going across my frame of view, a far higher speed is needed.

To get a real idea of the motion it's better to see both objects from another camera/viewpoint



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 05:25 AM
link   
a reply to: wmd_2008

So your ignoring the excited military pilots reactions and displayed data on the UFO they are chasing, saying it could be some camera glitch or shutter speed error, would have though they would have thrown that tape out in 2004 if it was nothing to worry about?



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 06:51 AM
link   
a reply to: makalit

Something you need to keep in mind is that to cross and survive the vast distances involved between the stars with the rigors and radiologicals that come with such a journey would require a material that could probably take the pressure, force and energies released by our atomic weaponry without damage or destruction.

If not a material then an energy type shield capable of withstanding such just to deflect particulate matter and radiation encountered during the journey would be an obvious requirement.

They would not need to dodge anything and would probably simply absorb or defect the energies released by atomic weaponry.

Or simply fade into another realm/dimension thus avoid the majority of damage which is probably where Aliens hail from rather than other stars system, if indeed they do exist.
edit on 20-12-2017 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 06:55 AM
link   
Every US military pilot may not be in on what the black projects are doing. Old Maverick is in the dark like the rest of us.

For all we know, if these are ET UFOs, they could be able to manipulate what we see and record with our technology. We see what they want us to see.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 06:56 AM
link   
dumb thread



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 07:17 AM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

We've seen these things take lightning strikes. That's for sure.
You'd have to ask a chemist what I suspect is true.
Uranium is already highly unstable, holding so many atoms at what cost. It's so lunky that when you shoot an atom at it, it looses one of it's neutrons and that neutron hits another uranium atom and so on and keeps on going and each separated neutron sets off massive amounts, pushing the explosion faster and wider and keeps going.
But what I suspect is that, basically this stuff shreds all matter into energy, into dust. When those neutrons flying off touch one of their ships, they are going to be deflecting neutrons off of the ships material. No material can get so dense as each atom is spaced out widely. Each atom is separated by electrons, therefore has no shield against other neutrons, they are separated by large distances. Therefore my initial premise is nothing is protected against an atom bomb.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 07:38 AM
link   
a reply to: makalit

"We've seen these things take lightning strikes."

Planes, trains, and automobiles do that all the time without damage or incident, nothing mysterious there, just simple physics.

"But what I suspect is that, basically this stuff shreds all matter into energy"

To get here from another star system you are probably going to be able to master matter and energy in ways we have yet to fully realize.

Fact of the matter is that it's all energy, the only difference is the speed of vibration really.


Master that principle and nothing could touch you, literally.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 07:47 AM
link   
a reply to: alldaylong

I dont think they are extra-terrestrial , I think they are terrestrial
and not alien , and not human

they live here, we are the aliens !
I think we were brought here and used as some form of terraforming or something
we were created to terraform and change the atmosphere
and suppress everything else for some reason



edit on 20-12-2017 by sapien82 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 07:57 AM
link   
a reply to: sapien82

I thought we were created to mine Monoatomic Gold?


As to being created someplace else and then transported here, that other place would have to be remarkably similar to Earth for us to survive here now, else gravity, biology, and atmosphere would have killed us soon after arrival i imagine.

If we were designed or created it was most lightly done so within this planet's atmosphere but there is absolutely no evidence to support such.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 08:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: makalit
Fact of the matter is that it's all energy, the only difference is the speed of vibration really.


Master that principle and nothing could touch you, literally.

Actually there is no matter or energy, only wills of desire. But agreed



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 08:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: makalit

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: makalit
Fact of the matter is that it's all energy, the only difference is the speed of vibration really.


Master that principle and nothing could touch you, literally.

Actually there is no matter or energy, only wills of desire. But agreed

And our understanding of it is on par with our body comparison in size to existence, of why it is, what it is, how it is.
Here we have an infinitely conscious existence, that knows the back of every particle, and knows what we are gonna be doing in 20 minutes from now to a T, and here we are thinking we have the right to say we might be right.

Hahahaha. Maybe in a heart-conscious way we can 'feel it'.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 08:25 AM
link   
Basically the stuff we/aliens know, is only the stuff relevent to our own desire.
Basically it's just 1/infinite takes.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: myss427
a reply to: wmd_2008

So your ignoring the excited military pilots reactions and displayed data on the UFO they are chasing, saying it could be some camera glitch or shutter speed error, would have though they would have thrown that tape out in 2004 if it was nothing to worry about?


I suggest you re read what I said the problem is it's sometimes difficult to determine how an object is moving on video or with your eyes it's position and direction relative to the camera/eye can make you think one way when it's not actually the case.

For example if a plane passing 30,000 feet over your head contines towards the horizon it will look to you that it is dropping down to the horizon when in reality it's still flying level at the same height.

I hope that explains things in simple enough terms for you, apparent motion/change of directions may not be what they seem I was using shutter speed as an example only and how direction relative to the camera has to be considered.



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join