posted on Dec, 19 2017 @ 04:21 PM
The Op has pointed out the reason for why Clinton will not be charged with a crime or go to jail.
However, there is one other thing that is not mentioned or thought about:
The evidence. There needs to be hard evidence to convict a jury of the guilt. If you look at the Clintons since Bill took the oath of office the
first time, it becomes clear that political bias has always interfered with any and all investigations. The first person who did that, was found to
have made up and lied about the evidence he collected, violating laws and just common decency to get what he had. And when it came up, the
politicians paying him went real silent. This was seen more in the past few years, from the entire debacle of the pizzagate, that turned out to be
false, (the building did not have a basement) to the entire Bengazhi hearings, where Trey Gowdy was found to have tampered with the evidence.
Combined with the political witch hunt, trying to constantly link the Clintons with just about every crime under the sun, to where it becomes pretty
You want to get her convicted, and I am sure that there may be a crime or 2 that has been broken, however, it needs to be nonpartisan in nature. It
can’t be in the public spot light, nor can there be leaks and suppositions, just cold hard facts. And ultimately, it cannot be just one sided.
That means if you are stating it is a crime for her to hide emails, then one should be crying foul when the other side does such.
That is why one is not seeing any convictions flying out the door or politicians going to jail, cause neither side is interested in doing such and it
is all partisan politics, and there is no interest in justice.