It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: heineken
a reply to: chr0naut
hey man!
test your little brain in this universe a bit...
with all the technologies...rockets!! ..space missions!!!! bla bla bla...
can you find one film..that show a rocket leaving earth ..to the point we see a whole globe
hmmm
none...
...hmm and btw..how are you guys finding this thread..LOL threads dont appear in the recent etc ..correct me if im wrong
originally posted by: TerminalVelocity
You guys do realize that you're arguing with a Flat Earther, right?
You'd have more success in having a debate with a brick wall.
There's a really good reason why ATS puts these threads here in LOL.
originally posted by: heineken
No one can deny experiments both from the ground and air are putting the Heliocentric Globe Earth model to test.
This type of lens allows more of the scene to be included in the photograph, which is useful in architectural, interior and landscape photography where the photographer may not be able to move farther from the scene to photograph it.
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: heineken
No one can deny experiments both from the ground and air are putting the Heliocentric Globe Earth model to test.
You do keep rabbiting on at times,
Here's a current picture...the Dragon module arrives at the ISS, it's a typical wide angle lens picture to allow a better view of both foreground and objects further away, allowing a more panoramic view with the caveat of having a slight distortion of the view, however it's quite plain as you can see here, that only a small portion of the earth is in view, while this picture has a slight curve, it's not the earth curvature.
files.abovetopsecret.com...
en.wikipedia.org...
Extract,
This type of lens allows more of the scene to be included in the photograph, which is useful in architectural, interior and landscape photography where the photographer may not be able to move farther from the scene to photograph it.
Above is why such a lens is used, the pictures are for a practical use, not for titillation.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: heineken
In other words, you can’t explain Crux and Polaris on a flat earth.
Now it’s been shown you’re unable to disprove the spheroid earth because of Crux and Polaris, my time in this thread is done.
originally posted by: heineken
a reply to: tommyjo
that is a very good video , i really enjoyed it and I must say to me its clear the earth is globe. But for fairness we must in this particular situation not taking evidence from NASA into consideration.
the thing is with billions in budget i think you can go that far in making everything believable.
So i think the solution is to keep believing nasa which is the only source but still keep progressing with experiments in particular rockets and balloons.
I dont think i saw a full uncut footage of earth appearing as a whole during rocket flights, it's always replaced with animation. Please correct me if im wrong and post link