It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The US Government Just Released Authentic Footage of UFOs;

page: 2
33
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 16 2017 @ 07:08 PM
link   
a reply to: fleabit

Some of the stuff we're reporting IS our own stuff!!
Look at last weekend for instance.

That's the problem with the UFO field right now is most people me included need to learn MORE about what's ours before going nuts. I would suspect if the two pilots took footage of one of our own black projects this footage would have just been erased.




posted on Dec, 16 2017 @ 08:27 PM
link   
The most significant reality about aliens is that they will cause Armageddon.



edit on 16-12-2017 by eraTera because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2017 @ 08:38 PM
link   

That's the problem with the UFO field right now is most people me included need to learn MORE about what's ours before going nuts.


If it were aliens -or- black tech, you are not going to learn more about it.

The things that are interesting to me are the technologies that simply don't exist now. If they did, we'd know. A propulsion that does not need thrust or lift, but can travel at great speeds and hover is something on one is going to convince me any government can yet do. Of course, these reports have been around for a long time. But we keep hearing "black projects!" But we've seen these sorts of reports for decades. But apparently it's always new black tech.

What are our flight capabilities based on now? Thrust creating lift.. and lighter than air travel. That's about it. So when you have a craft that can fly without thrust (thrust is easily visible on the radar used in the video), and it's obviously not a helium based devices, it's using something we are probably literally decades from discovering. Of perhaps longer.

But many will never back down from this. A Navy ship, calls their own to investigate something very unusual, it's black tech. A pilot sees a fleet of objects doing extraordinary things.. but apparently it's black projects.

Until aliens land on the White House lawn (or pick your favorite country for first contact), people are going to keep saying the same thing. It's easier than believing in visitors from another world.
edit on 16-12-2017 by fleabit because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2017 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: fleabit
Hay, I want to see something as bad as anyone... But I would like some clarity, not a blurred picture or blob.



posted on Dec, 16 2017 @ 10:27 PM
link   
Only in the last video does it appear to have any shape.


I'll admit the last video had some substance to it though..
edit on 17-12-2017 by Plotus because: dooooh



posted on Dec, 17 2017 @ 08:42 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 17 2017 @ 12:58 PM
link   
LOOK AT THAT THING DUDE!!

This is a really interesting video, I'm thirsty for more. It rotates what the hell is that??? I



posted on Dec, 17 2017 @ 09:56 PM
link   
The more I look at his video the more it looks like a computer game.

Like command and conquer.



posted on Dec, 18 2017 @ 03:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Caver78

Im not sold on rapid acceleration. Looks to me more like the f18 turned away and disengaged its lock on the UAP and because of that it appears to leave frame suddenly.



posted on Dec, 18 2017 @ 03:48 AM
link   
a reply to: fleabit

Everything in that video is plausible with black tech from the "aura" to the no exhaust heat to the "stealthyness" of it to the "translucency" of visual and radar spectrum. Material science and many others used extensively in black projects have come a long way.



posted on Dec, 18 2017 @ 03:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: fleabit

Everything in that video is plausible with black tech from the "aura" to the no exhaust heat to the...
Isn't the aura most likely a camera artifact? See this post:

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 18 2017 @ 04:07 AM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR

Shouldn't that be visible on the HUD info? I don't see any major changes regarding turning angle at the moment you see the object accelerate (mind, I'm not a specialist). But yeah perhaps it's just the tracker losing the lock. At these speeds and zoom I don't find the acceleration that extreme, but I need to rewatch everything again.

For some reason I find it more likely this footage is released knowing it's own black tech rather than unknown foreign tech. Why? Imagine the implications of a foreign nation seeing that US doesn't know what their craft is.

Still excited about this footage though. Really cool, and perhaps ... who knows ...

Time to lurk on the aviation boards more often it seems.



posted on Dec, 18 2017 @ 04:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Arbitrageur

In my opinion yeah



posted on Dec, 18 2017 @ 05:31 AM
link   
a reply to: eraTera

Why would you think that?



posted on Dec, 18 2017 @ 10:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: fleabit

Everything in that video is plausible with black tech from the "aura" to the no exhaust heat to the "stealthyness" of it to the "translucency" of visual and radar spectrum. Material science and many others used extensively in black projects have come a long way.


You are spot on about the advancements in material sciences in the last decade. A lot of back money has been funneled into that area recently in an attempt to "take it to the next level". This includes active response materials and low EM observability dynamic skins.

Or......so I hear from an acquaintance in advanced material sciences I've known since grade school.




posted on Dec, 18 2017 @ 10:44 PM
link   
a reply to: bluemooone2 Important question: The Gimbal "It's a [expletive] drone, bro" video is showing something above the cloud cover, correct? How come the original Fighter Sweep article below states the 2004 incident happened on a clear blue sky day?

fightersweep.com...


edit on 18-12-2017 by Flatwoods because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 01:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: Flatwoods
a reply to: bluemooone2 Important question: The Gimbal "It's a [expletive] drone, bro" video is showing something above the cloud cover, correct? How come the original Fighter Sweep article below states the 2004 incident happened on a clear blue sky day?

fightersweep.com...

What makes you think the article is about the same event as the video? The information provided by ToTheStars is very poor, for example it doesn't mention the date of the incident, does it?

The article also mentions the object shooting off to the left at incredible speed and the video doesn't show that, so lots of things in the video don't match the article, including the clouds discrepancy.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 03:01 AM
link   
a reply to: eraTera

Why do you say that?



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 11:36 AM
link   
So are some saying, that experienced USAF fighter pilots , are not able to distinguish a drone or a camera artifact.

If some are going down the above road then i wonder when we will have a separate thread on the scary thought that, US air space is being patrolled and protected by such USAF fighter pilots.

Something was seen , something caused USAF pilots to not only investigate this object, but to offer such commentary on what they were witnessing.

These guys must have first hand experience of 100s of sortes /patrols of US air space that's the common denominator with me here, these experienced pilots were spooked enough , spooked enough to utter what they said.

If USAF pilots testimonies are being challenged by those sitting in front of their laptops and who after all were NOT there and did not experce or see what those USAF pilots seen then those challengers should be working in the US defence department, because clearly those USAF pilots need retraining.



posted on Dec, 20 2017 @ 11:47 AM
link   
So.
Instead of releasing ufo crap, why not release the tapes collected in September '01?

There were too many pages redacted in that chapter.

Back it up a few pages before starting a new chapter.

Honesty is a good policy to build a foundation upon?




top topics



 
33
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join