It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Documents Reveal Hillary Clinton “Struck a Deal” to Keep Records Private

page: 2
51
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:45 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I love how you think this was a secret arrangement.




posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:48 PM
link   
All this crap adds up to a pattern of behavior that is undeniable.

None of it is a "one off"

How about huma's muslim files.

Wake up Jeff.





posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: xuenchen

I love how you think this was a secret arrangement.


Given the Clintons from Arkansas on, why would you want to believe otherwise?

You could wonder about the oversight that probably should have been done as they thumbed through the data and info, right? But, Oh, wait, she owned the state department! Of course she walked away with any incriminating stuff. Obama probably used his pickup truck to help her haul it.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:52 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Of course the globalists deep state crooks got each other's back. Glad that she lost. Now if only we can somehow get the crooks out of the deep state as well.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy



All this crap adds up to a pattern of behavior that is undeniable.

You mean following required procedures for removing personal records.

(1) The departing official or a staff member must prepare an inventory of personal papers and nonrecord materials proposed for removal. The inventory need not be a listing of documents, but rather a description of categories of documents (e.g., resumes, personal correspondence, documents related to financial disclosure, and copies of speeches”);

(2) When the inventory is completed, the departing official must request a review of the materials proposed for removal. In the Department, the records officer in cooperation with the S/ES or appropriate administrative office will conduct the review for Presidential appointees confirmed by the Senate. The administrative or executive office conducts the review for other Department officials and/or employees. At Foreign Service posts and domestic field offices, the administrative officer will conduct the review for all officials. Reviewing officials will consult with the Department’s records officer as necessary;

(3) The purpose of the review is to certify that the documentary materials proposed for removal may be removed without diminishing the official records of the Department; violating national security, privacy or other restrictions on disclosure; or exceeding normal administrative economies. This generally requires a hands on examination of the materials to verify the accuracy of the inventory;

(4) Once the reviewing official is satisfied that documentary materials proposed for removal comply with Federal law and regulations the reviewing official completes Form DS-1904, Authorization for the Removal of Personal Papers and Non-Record Materials, and forwards the form and the inventory to the Department of State records officer.

upload.wikimedia.org...
edit on 12/14/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

A "bologna" sandwich maybe.

How many of these thread are you going to make before you realize Hillary isn't president?



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: xuenchen
This one is about some kind of secret "arrangement" She apparently *obtained* to get many of her so called "personal" documents kept hidden !


i think "this" might be what "the kids" call a "nothing burger"


Actually this one is a great big SOMETHING SANDWICH !!



But "where's the beef"?

Sorry, could not help myself.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burgerbuddy



All this crap adds up to a pattern of behavior that is undeniable.

You mean following required procedures for removing personal records.

(1) The departing official or a staff member must prepare an inventory of personal papers and nonrecord materials proposed for removal. The inventory need not be a listing of documents, but rather a description of categories of documents (e.g., resumes, personal correspondence, documents related to financial disclosure, and copies of speeches”);

(2) When the inventory is completed, the departing official must request a review of the materials proposed for removal. In the Department, the records officer in cooperation with the S/ES or appropriate administrative office will conduct the review for Presidential appointees confirmed by the Senate. The administrative or executive office conducts the review for other Department officials and/or employees. At Foreign Service posts and domestic field offices, the administrative officer will conduct the review for all officials. Reviewing officials will consult with the Department’s records officer as necessary;

(3) The purpose of the review is to certify that the documentary materials proposed for removal may be removed without diminishing the official records of the Department; violating national security, privacy or other restrictions on disclosure; or exceeding normal administrative economies. This generally requires a hands on examination of the materials to verify the accuracy of the inventory;

(4) Once the reviewing official is satisfied that documentary materials proposed for removal comply with Federal law and regulations the reviewing official completes Form DS-1904, Authorization for the Removal of Personal Papers and Non-Record Materials, and forwards the form and the inventory to the Department of State records officer.

upload.wikimedia.org...


No, I mean everything about the FBI, DOJ, State Dept, emails and all that's surrounding Hillary Clinton.

She lies and they swear to it.




posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen

What debacle?

She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.

It happens often when people leave positions/office.

That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.


Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen

What debacle?

She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.

It happens often when people leave positions/office.

That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.


Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......


I believe she left her position well before the investigation began.

2 years before.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:31 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

“According to a totally discredited website, that regularly posts stories about pizzagate and other debunked right wing conspiracies, hillary cut a deal to keep documents procate..”

Lol..

Just another fake story from the propaganda fountain of ATS..
edit on 14-12-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen

What debacle?

She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.

It happens often when people leave positions/office.

That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.


Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......


I believe she left her position well before the investigation began.

2 years before.


The "agreement" is dated in 2013.
As early as 2009, officials with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) expressed concerns over possible violations of normal federal government record-keeping procedures at the State Department under then-Secretary Clinton



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:58 PM
link   
a reply to: M5xaz

Clinton was confirmed on January 21, 2009. I mention that because it would seem unlikely that any government organization would respond so quickly. Can you provide a reference to what you are talking about? It would seem likely that such an assessment would have involved the previous administration.
edit on 12/14/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen

What debacle?

She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.

It happens often when people leave positions/office.

That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.


Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......


I believe she left her position well before the investigation began.

2 years before.


The "agreement" is dated in 2013.
As early as 2009, officials with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) expressed concerns over possible violations of normal federal government record-keeping procedures at the State Department under then-Secretary Clinton


Ok. Was she currently under investigation for criminal matters or mishandling classified documents at that time?



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen

What debacle?

She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.

It happens often when people leave positions/office.

That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.


Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......


I believe she left her position well before the investigation began.

2 years before.


The "agreement" is dated in 2013.
As early as 2009, officials with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) expressed concerns over possible violations of normal federal government record-keeping procedures at the State Department under then-Secretary Clinton


Ok. Was she currently under investigation for criminal matters or mishandling classified documents at that time?


Unfortunately, that information is classified.




posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 10:26 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




personal” materials and “unclassified, non-record materials

Any proof this part ISN'T true?
I'm ok with this part, if it's true.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 10:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen

What debacle?

She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.

It happens often when people leave positions/office.

That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.


Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......


I believe she left her position well before the investigation began.

2 years before.


The "agreement" is dated in 2013.
As early as 2009, officials with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) expressed concerns over possible violations of normal federal government record-keeping procedures at the State Department under then-Secretary Clinton


Ok. Was she currently under investigation for criminal matters or mishandling classified documents at that time?


Unfortunately, that information is classified.



Well Trump does have the power to declassify anything he wants.

He should.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 10:42 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox


According to a totally discredited website, that regularly posts stories about pizzagate and other debunked right wing conspiracies, hillary cut a deal to keep documents procate..”

Maybe this will help it comes from a different website.


“We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information. But these new records show that was only part of the scandal. These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws. When are the American people going to get an honest investigation of the Clinton crimes?”
Here

Try to derail all you want doesn't change a thing


edit on 14-12-2017 by Diisenchanted because: to fix



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 10:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen

What debacle?

She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.

It happens often when people leave positions/office.

That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.


And you believe Hillary used that in a way that was ethical and representative of moral integrity? LOL!



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 10:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Diisenchanted

There was no deal. It is standard procedure.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



new topics

top topics



 
51
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join