It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: xuenchen
I love how you think this was a secret arrangement.
All this crap adds up to a pattern of behavior that is undeniable.
(1) The departing official or a staff member must prepare an inventory of personal papers and nonrecord materials proposed for removal. The inventory need not be a listing of documents, but rather a description of categories of documents (e.g., resumes, personal correspondence, documents related to financial disclosure, and copies of speeches”);
(2) When the inventory is completed, the departing official must request a review of the materials proposed for removal. In the Department, the records officer in cooperation with the S/ES or appropriate administrative office will conduct the review for Presidential appointees confirmed by the Senate. The administrative or executive office conducts the review for other Department officials and/or employees. At Foreign Service posts and domestic field offices, the administrative officer will conduct the review for all officials. Reviewing officials will consult with the Department’s records officer as necessary;
(3) The purpose of the review is to certify that the documentary materials proposed for removal may be removed without diminishing the official records of the Department; violating national security, privacy or other restrictions on disclosure; or exceeding normal administrative economies. This generally requires a hands on examination of the materials to verify the accuracy of the inventory;
(4) Once the reviewing official is satisfied that documentary materials proposed for removal comply with Federal law and regulations the reviewing official completes Form DS-1904, Authorization for the Removal of Personal Papers and Non-Record Materials, and forwards the form and the inventory to the Department of State records officer.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: fiverx313
originally posted by: xuenchen
This one is about some kind of secret "arrangement" She apparently *obtained* to get many of her so called "personal" documents kept hidden !
i think "this" might be what "the kids" call a "nothing burger"
Actually this one is a great big SOMETHING SANDWICH !!
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burgerbuddy
All this crap adds up to a pattern of behavior that is undeniable.
You mean following required procedures for removing personal records.
(1) The departing official or a staff member must prepare an inventory of personal papers and nonrecord materials proposed for removal. The inventory need not be a listing of documents, but rather a description of categories of documents (e.g., resumes, personal correspondence, documents related to financial disclosure, and copies of speeches”);
(2) When the inventory is completed, the departing official must request a review of the materials proposed for removal. In the Department, the records officer in cooperation with the S/ES or appropriate administrative office will conduct the review for Presidential appointees confirmed by the Senate. The administrative or executive office conducts the review for other Department officials and/or employees. At Foreign Service posts and domestic field offices, the administrative officer will conduct the review for all officials. Reviewing officials will consult with the Department’s records officer as necessary;
(3) The purpose of the review is to certify that the documentary materials proposed for removal may be removed without diminishing the official records of the Department; violating national security, privacy or other restrictions on disclosure; or exceeding normal administrative economies. This generally requires a hands on examination of the materials to verify the accuracy of the inventory;
(4) Once the reviewing official is satisfied that documentary materials proposed for removal comply with Federal law and regulations the reviewing official completes Form DS-1904, Authorization for the Removal of Personal Papers and Non-Record Materials, and forwards the form and the inventory to the Department of State records officer.
upload.wikimedia.org...
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen
What debacle?
She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.
It happens often when people leave positions/office.
That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen
What debacle?
She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.
It happens often when people leave positions/office.
That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.
Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen
What debacle?
She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.
It happens often when people leave positions/office.
That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.
Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......
I believe she left her position well before the investigation began.
2 years before.
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen
What debacle?
She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.
It happens often when people leave positions/office.
That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.
Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......
I believe she left her position well before the investigation began.
2 years before.
The "agreement" is dated in 2013.
As early as 2009, officials with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) expressed concerns over possible violations of normal federal government record-keeping procedures at the State Department under then-Secretary Clinton
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen
What debacle?
She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.
It happens often when people leave positions/office.
That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.
Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......
I believe she left her position well before the investigation began.
2 years before.
The "agreement" is dated in 2013.
As early as 2009, officials with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) expressed concerns over possible violations of normal federal government record-keeping procedures at the State Department under then-Secretary Clinton
Ok. Was she currently under investigation for criminal matters or mishandling classified documents at that time?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen
What debacle?
She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.
It happens often when people leave positions/office.
That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.
Ummm, no, just.... no........not when that person is under criminal investigation......and criminal investigation for mishandling documents to top it off......
I believe she left her position well before the investigation began.
2 years before.
The "agreement" is dated in 2013.
As early as 2009, officials with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) expressed concerns over possible violations of normal federal government record-keeping procedures at the State Department under then-Secretary Clinton
Ok. Was she currently under investigation for criminal matters or mishandling classified documents at that time?
Unfortunately, that information is classified.
According to a totally discredited website, that regularly posts stories about pizzagate and other debunked right wing conspiracies, hillary cut a deal to keep documents procate..”
Here
“We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information. But these new records show that was only part of the scandal. These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws. When are the American people going to get an honest investigation of the Clinton crimes?”
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen
What debacle?
She filled out the appropriate request form and was allowed to take what was deemed personal.
It happens often when people leave positions/office.
That's why the government has a form to be filled out for such a request.