It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Deputy AG Won’t Say Whether The FBI Paid For Dossier

page: 5
34
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 07:38 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Yeah.

It's like when Trump was saying that the election was rigged...until he won.

Hypothetically, if the Mueller investigation finds no further wrong doing, can you trust that finding?
edit on 12/14/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 07:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: gimcrackery
Judicial Watch will be after them in court. Sounds like many people in office need to be purged.a reply to: Diisenchanted


"Purged," Comrade?



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 07:38 PM
link   
What this is saying is that there is an active investigation and some of the information that there is present is probably classified or part of said investigation. And the man could not answer that question, even if he wanted to in an open hearing.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Half the country will and half the country won't.
edit on 14-12-2017 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 07:44 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

How very cynical of you. I will accept the findings either way.

I asked you. Will you?

edit on 12/14/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 07:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Considering there seems to be a ways to go and there is a lot coming out about the investigation itself ... we may not ever get to a conclusion at this rate.

And the conclusion we do get to may look nothing like anything anyone ever expected.

I can't even begin to guess, but it goes beyond the definition of "is" and stained dress at the moment.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Ty Cobb says they're just about done.

So, you won't answer my question.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ketsuko

Ty Cobb says they're just about done.

So, you won't answer my question.


Because I don't generally accept things sight unseen. Do you?



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr


If he was under investigation a lawyer should have been present and a copy of the transcript given to him to remind him of the details.


That's his problem for not requesting it or one or exercising his rights.


But Flynn being a fool didntrealize they had the conversation and set him up.


Or, rather, Flynn being a fool thought he could weasel out of it by lying, and he got caught. Bigly.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

I asked a hypothetical question. I'll repeat it.

If no further wrong doing is discovered, will you accept the findings?

edit on 12/14/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:19 PM
link   
Why is the FBI even allowed to answer with "I’m not in a position to answer that question"?



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

Because it was a public hearing and the question concerned an ongoing investigation.
edit on 12/14/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ketsuko

I asked a hypothetical question. I'll repeat it.

If no further wrong doing is discovered, will you accept the findings?


I don't know. Will there be a document leaked out late on that shows someone revised it a bunch of times to make something look less criminal?

You know, like with the Hillary Investigation?



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:22 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

I placed no conditions. It was a simple hypothetical question.
Never mind. Don't answer it.

edit on 12/14/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Diisenchanted

if this turns out that they paid for it then at worst this entity needs to be disbanded or at least all obama appointees and sycophants need to be fired . also it needs to be determined if ag or obama put them up to it if so we charge them with trying to interfere with election and if found guilty.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage


Ill answer, at this point how can we accept anything they say?

Innocent or guilty with all the perception of double dealing by people, all the targeted leaks meant to sway public opinion, investigating agents seeming to be unable to control their personal feelings.

We should all have some semblence of doubt over any result they claim is the truth, since as of late the FBI seems to have forgotten what Integrity means.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:56 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

are they already writing the finding of the investigation before its complete?
not like they havent done that before



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 09:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ketsuko

are they already writing the finding of the investigation before its complete?
not like they havent done that before


With Washington, I wouldn't put anything past anyone.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ketsuko

I placed no conditions. It was a simple hypothetical question.
Never mind. Don't answer it.


I have answered it.

Your problem is that you're like so many of the opponents in debate. You want that yes or no, but you haven't given a yes or no question. At this stage, there is no yes or no I can give.



posted on Dec, 14 2017 @ 10:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: sdcigarpig
What this is saying is that there is an active investigation and some of the information that there is present is probably classified or part of said investigation. And the man could not answer that question, even if he wanted to in an open hearing.


Congress has oversight granted by constitution and they have the classifications needed.



new topics

top topics



 
34
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join