It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Diisenchanted
a reply to: Phage
We need an special investigator to investigate the special investigator who is investigating the special investigator who is investigating the special investigator.
Therein lies the problem, it sucks to have zero confidence in the justice department.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: Diisenchanted
a reply to: Phage
We need an special investigator to investigate the special investigator who is investigating the special investigator who is investigating the special investigator.
Therein lies the problem, it sucks to have zero confidence in the justice department.
This is the real problem. How can we ever take anything the FBI says or does seriously after this? I mean, anyone who isn't profoundly retarded knows that if the answer to that question was "No, we not pay any money for the Dossier," Rosenstein would have just said that. Giving a vague non-answer like he did just confirms that he realizes the truth will get him trouble. (Deeper trouble.)
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Diisenchanted
How would he know if it was done behind his back? And in any event, it is pretty clear that Clinton supporters paid for the dossier, not the FBI.
originally posted by: butcherguy
There is already info out there regarding the FBI and their relationship with Steele:
After the election, the FBI agreed to pay Steele to continue gathering intelligence about Trump and Russia, but the bureau pulled out of the arrangement after Steele was publicly identified in news reports.
THE WASHINGTON POST
The FBI already admits that they agreed to pay Steele.... but pulled out.
Why couldn't Rosenstein admit under oath that they did not pay him?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Diisenchanted
It seems to me that this is a yes or no question.
It seems to me that you don't understand the meaning of ongoing investigation in the context of public testimony.
This testimony is part of that investigation, nitwit. Your logic is like a cop saying he can't tell you why you're being arrested because it's part of an ongoing investigation.
How about we just get to a point where we are told what our government is doing? It is OUR GOVERNMENT after all
Fair enough. But there are certain parts that should not be revealed. (meaning parts of investigations). Too much open info too soon can hurt the process.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Diisenchanted
And if the results are anything other than expected, the results are lies.
Anything other than a 'NO' is a flat out YES, the FBI paid for the evidence...And when they didn't think they had enough evidence, Steele told them, 'for a little more money, I'll get you more evidence'...And of course his sources are anonymous...
originally posted by: Diisenchanted
To me this is sounding more and more fishy all the time.
“Did the FBI pay for the dossier?” DeSantis asked.
“I’m not in a position to answer that question,” Rosenstein responded.
“Do you know the answer to the question?” the Republican DeSantis followed up.
“I believe I know the answer, but the Intelligence Committee is the appropriate committee…” Rosenstein began.
It seems to me that this is a yes or no question.
If the FBI didn't pay for the dossier he would have answered the question.
The fact that he wouldn't answer the question makes it seem as if the FBI had a hand in paying for the dossier.
If the FBI did in fact pay for the dossier in part or in full they should not be investigating this issue.
The Muller investigation has no credibility. here
It makes one wonder if the dossier was the insurance policy that Peter Strzok was referring to.
It's clear only if you don't if you watch CNN or MSNBC...
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Diisenchanted
How would he know if it was done behind his back? And in any event, it is pretty clear that Clinton supporters paid for the dossier, not the FBI.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Diisenchanted
And if the results are anything other than expected, the results are lies.