It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Smoking Gun: The Trump Victory Insurance Policy - Muh Russia?

page: 1
51
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+33 more 
posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:08 AM
link   
In the treasure trove of texts sent between strzok and page there is a gem from august of 2015. While discussing how they want to believe that trump won't win strzok says:

but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40


Let that sink in. The FBI is talking about an insurance policy in case an election doesn't go the way they want it to. Now before someone tries to claim "it's ok for them to have opinions..." this is more than opinions. This is overt action. Taking out an insurance policy is not an opinion.

This is major news and could change the entire premise of the investigation. Without a little more context, it's hard to say for certain what the "insurance" policy was, but combined with the other things we know about the FBI, Fusion GPS, the Dossier, wiretaps, etc. It's not hard to believe that much of this may have been planned.

It's one thing to believe a conspiracy, it's a whole different ball game when you have messages from those at the top talking about the conspiracy as an insurance policy.

Link

Relevant part of linked article:

The two appear to have exchanged text messages on a range of topics, particularly during presidential debates and the 2016 political conventions -- on everything from Melania Trump's convention speech to a thinly veiled comment Trump made about his hands.

Later in a text from August 15, 2016, Strzok tells Page: "I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe -- "that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . . " Page does not appear to have responded, according to records reviewed by CNN.

edit on 13-12-2017 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



+12 more 
posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Oh come on now, you obviously don't have the proper context to understand the nuance of how this opinion doesn't affect the professionalism of the agents in charge of the investigation. I mean, there's no way in the world that these paragons of virtue would ever let something as insignificant as personal opinion affect their job performance or direction in which they take their investigation.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

What was the lead up to that text??

Because it obviously matters to know what he is referring to , to know what he is talking about.

By editing out the question, and only printing the answer, it makes me wonder if the text is talking about something completely different..



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical


I think you broke my sarcasm meter with that one, just got it replaced to dang.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite


but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40

Life insurance policy is like gambling.

Yo sit across the table from your insurance 'agent'. You are betting him you will die, he is betting you will live.

You hope he 'wins'.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

A) the texts I have seen thus far, are not really evidence of some conspiracy against trump , nor prove he hated him soooo much he fabricated evidence..

Say it is a murder trial, and the cop investigating it has texts that say ..

“I hope this POS goes down.. I think he did it. Plus he beats his kids.”

Is the murderer gonna walk??

Hell no..



B) Doesn’t the fact this guy was fired by Comey prove the investigation isn’t a witch hunt??

If they didn’t fire it , I do t think it would prove that, but then firing is undeniably evidence it is not a biased investigation..


+4 more 
posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:24 AM
link   
So long before the presidential election.

Was that 'insurance' policy part of ensuring CLinton, and her lackies skated ?

My guess is yes.

edit on 13-12-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:24 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr
It is also the smart way to pass on an inheritance without a heavy tax burden. You are going to die regardless of whether you give yourself a policy or not. May as well make sure your kids get a nest egg when it happens.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite


It's one thing to believe a conspiracy, it's a whole different ball game when you have messages from those at the top talking about the conspiracy as an insurance policy.


Hmmm... where is there a conspiracy people deny , where there are text messages that spell out the exact conspiracy people are denying?!?!!

Hmmm...


Good morning Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting. The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father. This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin. What do you think is the best way to handle this information and would you be able to speak to Emin about it directly? I can also send this info to your father via Rhona, but it is ultra sensitive so wanted to send to you first. Best Rob Goldstone


Man.. I feel like there is a perfect example of that somewhere, and I just can’t put my finger on it?!?!





posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite



Let that sink in. The FBI is talking about an insurance policy in case an election doesn't go the way they want it to.


Sounds to me like he may have been trying to put himself in a position to have a job no matter who was elected.

Do you have any other info than this or the rest of the conversation?

If not, this doesn't mean much at all.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite




It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40


Surely this can't be a simile. That would be an outrageous notion.

Because taking out an insurance policy, gambling that you die before 40 wouldn't be a risk at all. (please note sarcasm)



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 11:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: intrptr
It is also the smart way to pass on an inheritance without a heavy tax burden. You are going to die regardless of whether you give yourself a policy or not. May as well make sure your kids get a nest egg when it happens.

IF they don't find a way to nullify it on some hidden technicality.

Thats an added risk.

Kudos to you for thinking about your kids. Tell that to my parents.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 12:03 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Added to the OP.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

What's the conspiracy? To get dirt on an opponent? Lame conspiracy.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: introvert

Added to the OP.


I see you added something to the OP, but nothing in the way of context in regards to that particular statement.

Also, it does not appear this is indicative of anything other than his personal thoughts and will most likely not reflect on the FBI.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 12:31 PM
link   
Time to fire all the FBI higher ups, they are obviously political and actioning on it, which is absolutely against their purpose.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 12:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Time to fire all the FBI higher ups, they are obviously political and actioning on it, which is absolutely against their purpose.


If it's so obvious, you would have some proof available, right?

You're not just regurgitating the most recent propaganda, are you?



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Time to fire all the FBI higher ups, they are obviously political and actioning on it, which is absolutely against their purpose.


If it's so obvious, you would have some proof available, right?

You're not just regurgitating the most recent propaganda, are you?


Read the text provided in this OP.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Unless CNN is pushing this 'propaganda:'


"I cannot believe Donald Trump is likely to be an actual, serious candidate for president," Page texted Strzok on March 16, 2016.

"God(,) Trump is a loathsome human," Page added in another, to which Strzok replies: "Yet he may win."

The two appear to have exchanged text messages on a range of topics, particularly during presidential debates and the 2016 political conventions -- on everything from Melania Trump's convention speech to a thinly veiled comment Trump made about his hands.

Later in a text from August 15, 2016, Strzok tells Page: "I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe -- "that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . . " Page does not appear to have responded, according to records reviewed by CNN.



posted on Dec, 13 2017 @ 12:41 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Why would you think it didn't reflect the thoughts of the FBI? Remember, comey testified that he leaked information to get a special counsel appointed. Who is McCabe? Deputy director.

So do tell, why are you skeptical that this could be indicative of the FBI?

Also, what does an upper-mid level agent need an insurance policy against a new president for? His job is not a presidential appointment.



new topics

top topics



 
51
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join