It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Axeman
MaskedAvatar, is this similar to what the brother you spoke of had discovered?
Originally posted by dh
Masonry is all about stepping up
The most stay around the ground floors and are quite happy with that degree of power and control, which is mythical
The few chosen get up to the 33 and beyond
With their ever-increasing knowledge of how it all works
Don't you genuinely resent them for that? or are you quite content to stay at the bottom layers of the pyramid, happy that you support the structure and the capstone ultimately
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
In a word, no, but the youthful s. and r.e. of the day had no objective of selling books, LOL.
Originally posted by akilles
It is as tall as a 40 story building! And a perfect example of squaring the circle, a famous principle outside mathematics (in spiritual studies).
What walks on four feet at sunrise, walks on two at noon and walks on three at sunset?
Originally posted by TgSoe
What walks on four feet at sunrise, walks on two at noon and walks on three at sunset?
Originally posted by The AxemanPyramid is a Witness to the Bible, By looking at the measurements and proportions of the passages and chambers, as well as the geographical location and orientation of the Great Pyramid at Giza in relation to the scripture, they in some way connect, or match up.
Originally posted by Nygdan
I recall hearing about somewhat similiar research, but instead of the egyptian pyramids and the bible it was the 'universe' and the complexes of aztec temples. I think that the proportions of the various buildings and their interrealations similiarly 'matched up' to proportions of the earth and what amounts to astrological signs (tho I guess it was aztec astrology). I think, if I remember correctly, that it was also scaled, such that at one scale the proportions available for comparasion were to relate to one set of things, at anohter 'higher' scale another 'higher' set of things.
But this was from a documentary and I don't recall the originator of the idea.
Originally posted by akilles
Draw a square.
Draw a circle with equiv. area from center of square (meaning, circle and square share a center).
Draw a triangle up from the center of the square (on both sides), and connect it to the top of the circle.
You have just constructed the angle of the Great Pyramid, and if you were able to, squared the circle!
Thank you and good night.
Originally posted by akilles
Don’t be ignorant.
It’s different positioning based on whether you compare the area or the perimeter of the Square and Circle, but you should be able to find the same degrees I found in Photoshop, if not more exact.
Its really just easier to divide the slope (356) by half the base (220), but its your life. Cos inverse and boo yah.
I DID the hard work, but you'll still think I'm misled, even though you have no idea what my 'direction' is.
Originally posted by The Axeman
I'm man enough to admit I was in error, are you man enough to have a discussion...