The simple case for a periodic reset of reality

originally posted by: eXia7
I'm pretty sure the OP referenced that because of Tesla's theories on free energy.

Tesla didn't have theories on free energy, he wasn't that poor of a scientist.

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I guess you don't know where the energy comes from that the electric company produces to produce the means you use for everyday life, including typing on this forum all the stuff that the average monkey would, trying to produce a work of shakespeare or the like. I mean, given enough time and all, anything's possible.

Most of it comes from burning coal. What's your point?

a reply to: eXia7

that's just how the mechanics are turned. the energy itself has to come from somewhere. where?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: eXia7
I'm pretty sure the OP referenced that because of Tesla's theories on free energy.

Tesla didn't have theories on free energy, he wasn't that poor of a scientist.

Zero Point Energy

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: eXia7

I'm not saying I have the truths, but historically new truths are always ridiculed first.

I don't know about you but I'm comfortable ridiculing anyone that claims to know the TRUTH, new or old....

a reply to: eXia7

I had a dog and his name was...

a reply to: olaru12

yeah, you and everybody else. why not?

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: eXia7

I had a dog and his name was...

Mr Green?

originally posted by: eXia7
Zero Point Energy

Which we all know isn't waving a magnet over a coil. And this also isn't 'free energy'.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: eXia7
Zero Point Energy

Which we all know isn't waving a magnet over a coil. And this also isn't 'free energy'.

No, its not. But like I said, the OP seems a bit new to these theories, and hasn't articulated them in a structured manner.

If the OP feels up to it, they could share some literature that they have studied that might help others understand the point of this thread.

I mean not one person in this thread has asked for sources.

originally posted by: eXia7
I mean not one person in this thread has asked for sources.

It's Skunk Works, you're not allowed to ask for evidence.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: chr0naut

You mean the type of green that supposedly doesn’t exist?

Or was it just really well hidden?

Or was it somehow both?

Oh my!

We return to the Heidleberg interpretation (again). Is there anything it isn't good for?

Schrodingers green.

a reply to: eXia7

I mean not one person in this thread has asked for sources.

Skunk Works. No requirements for sources.

Also, it’s purely in the OPs head.

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: eXia7

I'm not saying I have the truths, but historically new truths are always ridiculed first.

but nonsense has far greater consistency.

It's always ridiculed.

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: olaru12

yeah, you and everybody else. why not?

I'm up for intellectual masturbation as much as the next guy, but don't get upset when someone suggest that you go wash your hands. Metaphorically speaking of course.....

a reply to: chr0naut

Schrodingers green.

It’s green and not green until we see something that is green?

(Like a green comet, for instance )

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: chr0naut

if you look at the progression of intensity levels, it goes from

red to orange to yellow to white to blue

I think we've seen that with the sun.

Despite studying the Sun (hey it's the best star for observation we are gonna get), I actually avoid looking at it directly.

Ok, when I say "sources" I'm not talking the typical left or right leaning toilet paper media. I mean some sources of interest that the OP studied that has brought him/her to ATS in the first place.

Don't start trying to take the piss at me because I actually came in this thread with the intention of actually discussing the topic. If I hurt your wittle feewings, I'm sorry. Maybe all those stars will help you feel better.

*yawn*

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: eXia7
I'm pretty sure the OP referenced that because of Tesla's theories on free energy.

Tesla didn't have theories on free energy, he wasn't that poor of a scientist.

Perhaps it was the pidgeon?

They are like rats with wings.

You couldn't call it Sally, though, that names taken.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

sure it is. where does the atom get its energy to sustain itself from?