It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Green proves simulation theory

page: 8
6
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:38 PM
link   
a reply to: ClovenSky

neat idea, thanks




posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:39 PM
link   
a reply to: dug88

well the theory is that once AI came 'on', it was always 'on'



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: CircleofFloss

not heard of that theory



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:04 PM
link   
The Skunk Works Forum Rules



As mentioned, this forum is for your most outlandish and extreme speculative conspiracy theory ideas. The intent is for like-minded members to engage in collaborative discussions about these theories in an environment that embraces and encourages extreme thought.

We certainly do not want to discourage the involvement of helpful critical analysis and skeptical thought, this will always be a very important part of collaboration on ATS. However, we will be strict in managing the tone and style of such exchanges. Please keep your critical involvement to helpful focus on issues, facts, and analysis of possibilities, and do not engage in disruptive character attacks, snipes, and insults in any way. Any such activity will result in a warning and removal of your post.


edit on Sat Dec 9 2017 by Jbird because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: Nothin

could be like that, but no matter how hard you want to believe the moon isn't there, there it is.

a computer could let us live as pets forever, except it wouldn't learn, which is what it wants.


Do They?
What else do computers want?



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: chr0naut

ah yes, all those monies going to Nasa for the purpose of something they don't tell us, that's crazy! no one believes that nonsense, especially on a CT site!


NASA is not the only group using technology for looking out into space. People have been doing that since before America existed, let alone NASA.

Let me give you a clue, Astronomical spectroscopy (from Wikipedia), the analysis of the color of light from stellar objects, has been going on for hundreds of years.

Nearly every star visible through a telescope produces significant amounts of green light.

The reason you don't see very green stars is because of its color-temperature curves. We only see stars because they are hot, causing their elements become incandescent (producing light).

Green light is usually swamped by other colors at temperatures where its output is the highest. You could google it if you want. In essence it is almost impossible to see anything out in space which isn't emitting green.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:11 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:12 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: ClovenSky

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: chr0naut

ah yes, all those monies going to Nasa for the purpose of something they don't tell us, that's crazy! no one believes that nonsense, especially on a CT site!


Just wait for the revelation that our universe isn't expanding. That the big bang is actually impossible and the red shift of galaxies denotes their age and not the speed at which they are moving away from our point of view.

Fun times ahead.


Yes, there are legitimate alternatives to the current "darling" theories!

I agree, the more you know...




posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: Illumimasontruth

yeah but the challenge is still from an accepted standpoint, and there are some things that are so out of date, like relativity or gravity, that shouldn't be in this day and age, 100's of years after the introduction of those outdated theories.


They only become outdated if someone else comes up with alternate theories with better explicatory power.

Neither have been disproven yet.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:20 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Yeah. Gravity is still very much in style.

It's very handy. Put something down and it stays there.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: chr0naut

Yeah. Gravity is still very much in style.

It's very handy. Put something down and it stays there.


Apparently some believe that this is due to the really big electromagnets secretly run by NASA aliens to lull us into a false sense of security. Then one day, they'll turn off the magnets and invade our minds with nano-controlling tech and holographic images.




edit on 9/12/2017 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Not a helium balloon lol



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: dan121212

Or my pet rat. For that matter.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage




posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: dan121212
a reply to: Phage

Not a helium balloon lol


Helium balloons don't stick to magnets, which proves that gravity is fake.




posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:30 PM
link   
THIS WHOLE THREADS GONE OFF TOPIC



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 07:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: dan121212
a reply to: Phage

Not a helium balloon lol


Rats are very intelligent and make great and loyal pets.

"a trained organism in a controlled environment will do what it damn well pleases".




new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join