It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Green proves simulation theory

page: 6
6
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 05:53 PM
link   
this is a laugh out loud thread




posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   
a reply to: CircleofFloss


you know, before Nasa, there was a time when all that existed, existed in this Galaxy.


Not quite.

There was a time when people THOUGHT nothing else existed. Science has since proven that very wrong.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: Nothin

please state the nature of your query correctly, thank you.


Who is to judge what "correctly" is?

Here is the post you were referring to:
***************************************************************************************************************************
""originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: Nothin
"a better AI would want us to figure it out, to see if we can beat him. otherwise, there would be no challenge."

"What makes you think there needs to be a challenge?
Is out-of-control ego, inventing imaginary conditions?""
***************************************************************************************************************************
Will try to put it another way:
Where did you get the concept that AI wants a challenge, or that it is a "him", and that it wants us to figure it out?
Do you think it's possible that it is our egos, that create much of the supposed reality around ourselves, and creating conditions upon this conceptual reality?



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 05:56 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

it's funny, because the only science that fails the scientific process is astronomy.

so that be what? one big...what?

fail.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 05:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: dan121212
this is a laugh out loud thread

I'd say it's half laugh out loud, half utterly mind numbing.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 05:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: TerryDon79

it's funny, because the only science that fails the scientific process is astronomy.

so that be what? one big...what?

fail.

Care to elaborate? I know a few professional astronomers and there many that are regular members here, all of whom I'm sure will be happy to succinctly refute your loony ideas.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 05:58 PM
link   
a reply to: CircleofFloss

How does it fail? Because you say so?

The same person who says there’s no green anywhere, but on Earth, then changes their story multiple times?



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Nothin

could be like that, but no matter how hard you want to believe the moon isn't there, there it is.

a computer could let us live as pets forever, except it wouldn't learn, which is what it wants.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:02 PM
link   
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

well go ahead and you or them try to explain what the scientific process entails. amazing that I have to say it a second time.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: Nothin

could be like that, but no matter how hard you want to believe the moon isn't there, there it is.

Are you sure? I don't see any green on it, so doesn't that mean it's simulated?



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

well go ahead and you or them try to explain what the scientific process entails. amazing that I have to say it a second time.

No. You made the claim that it "fails the scientific process" (whatever that means), thus the burden of proof lies with you.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:05 PM
link   
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

oh man I'm just now depressed that you said that. just sad how some people are. I'm sure you're good at other topics though, that gives me hope.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

oh man I'm just now depressed that you said that. just sad how some people are. I'm sure you're good at other topics though, that gives me hope.

So... No proof. Got it.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

exactly, because there aren't any smart people out there who believe in this simulation theory, are there genius?
The Simulation Theory ranks with the best we can come up with, as a collective species.

It likely will not be proven or disproved in our lifetimes. Maybe never will.

You have a disturbing level of confidence in what you are pushing here. Keep an open mind and question everything but we can't abandon logic and common sense.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:14 PM
link   
the Sun is essentially all colors mixed together



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:17 PM
link   
i think you been watching to much matrix films



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: dan121212
i think you been watching to much matrix films

Or smoking waaaay too much of something green.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:20 PM
link   
Shouldn't this be in Skunk Works?



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Illumimasontruth

unless there's a way to unlock the matrix, which was everything the Movie was about.

amazing how I can have a disturbing level of confidence in this thread, but the confidence level of those pushing MS science, even on a CT site where it should be challenged, is never challenged like it should.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
Shouldn't this be in Skunk Works?

I think all we can say for certain is that it shouldn't be in Science and Technology.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join