It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WTC 7 Evaluation Misses Draft Release of Nov 2017?

page: 2
5
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 29 2018 @ 09:11 AM
link   
By the way, below are the project dates listed on the University Website.



A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7

ine.uaf.edu...

Project Dates
May 1, 2015 - April 30, 2018




posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
I guess the WTC 7 Evaluation is not going to live up to its original promises of transparency and peer review, but also miss a 2018 release?


Maybe tied in with the grand jury process? Timeline does match (spring 2018).
US Attorney Letter

Or a serious problem within evaluation.



posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: democracydemo

I don’t think the study has much to do with the grand jury.

Current posting from the WTC 7 evaluation project website.



www.wtc7evaluation.org...

Dr. Leroy Hulsey gave the following update on March 27, 2018:

To all who have been following the University of Alaska Fairbanks study on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7:

First, I would like to thank you for your interest in and support of the study.

We had planned to release our findings for public review early this year. However, research often takes unexpected turns, and the more complicated the problem, the more difficult it is to predict the completion date. We are still in the process of studying hypothetical collapse mechanisms and attempting to simulate the building’s failure. Our goal is to determine, with a high degree of confidence, the sequence of failures that may have caused the observed collapse and to rule out those mechanisms that could not have caused the observed collapse.

We will release our findings for public review when we are sure we fully understand the mechanisms that are likely to have caused the observed collapse and those that clearly did not occur and could not have caused the observed collapse. We expect to publish our findings later this year, but we will refrain from naming a completion date, given the unpredictability of the research process.

Again, we thank you for your interest in our study and we appreciate your patience as we strive to bring a truly scientific answer to the important question of how WTC 7 collapsed on September 11, 2001.

Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey

Chair, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

University of Alaska Fairbanks



posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 01:02 PM
link   
a reply to: democracydemo

Here are some links to a person that posted their filtered opinion on a podcast that was said to be an update to the study on 9-6-2018 at metabunk:

www.metabunk.org...
www.metabunk.org...

A page that has a link to the actual podcast:



9/11 FREE FALL 9/6/18: WTC 7 STUDY UPDATE
911freefall.com...

Dr. Leroy Hulsey joins host Andy Steele to update the audience on the WTC 7 study, which is nearing completion, as well as share some of his current findings.


I don’t know if it’s telling or odd, but the WTC 7 Evaluation site and the University WTC 7 site reflect none of the information given in the Podcast from 9-6-2018?
edit on 31-12-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

As for metabunk and Oystein: The devil can cite scripture for his purpose, ie. Cherry picking at it finest.

We both hate to be in the dark with the WTC7 evalution, there is a reason for this.



posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: democracydemo
a reply to: neutronflux

As for metabunk and Oystein: The devil can cite scripture for his purpose, ie. Cherry picking at it finest.

We both hate to be in the dark with the WTC7 evalution, there is a reason for this.


I am not waiting. I don’t think it will ever be released. It’s never going to be released under the conditions as advertised when the original donations were solicited. And I don’t think the university wants its name tied to a study where donations were sought under what are now false pretexts and/or a study that will not conform to peer review.

If I was a betting man, you might see some pseudoscience report in the future once the university figures out how to distance themselves from a study that now has no intention to complete an actual discovery process.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 09:18 PM
link   
The date still on the University of Alaska’s WTC 7 Evaluation page...


ine.uaf.edu...

Project Dates
May 1, 2015 - April 30, 2018



The project team doesn’t even bother updating the release date any longer.


edit on 23-3-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 05:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
The date still on the University of Alaska’s WTC 7 Evaluation page...


ine.uaf.edu...

Project Dates
May 1, 2015 - April 30, 2018



The project team doesn’t even bother updating the release date any longer.



Do you think anyone will be getting a refund?



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 07:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: mrthumpy

originally posted by: neutronflux
The date still on the University of Alaska’s WTC 7 Evaluation page...


ine.uaf.edu...

Project Dates
May 1, 2015 - April 30, 2018



The project team doesn’t even bother updating the release date any longer.



Do you think anyone will be getting a refund?


Nope. In fact, I bet the sheep will still donate to AE 9/11 Truth despite the numerous broken promises concerning the WTC 7 Evaluation.



posted on Mar, 28 2019 @ 09:37 AM
link   
Still waiting on the WTC 7 Evaluation release



posted on Mar, 28 2019 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
Still waiting on the WTC 7 Evaluation release


I wonder if they're hoping everyone will just forget about it



posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 02:16 PM
link   
wtc6Say what you want about building 7 (even as the brits commented on it falling before it was pulled) what about building 6?

photo of building 6

edit on 7-4-2019 by CrazyFox because: link error

edit on 7-4-2019 by CrazyFox because: new to this

edit on 7-4-2019 by CrazyFox because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 03:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: CrazyFox
wtc6Say what you want about building 7 (even as the brits commented on it falling before it was pulled) what about building 6?

photo of building 6


How about reading through an actual WTC 6 debate instead of watching truth movement propaganda.



www.metabunk.org/wtc-6-what-happened-there.t1809/
www.metabunk.org...




Arson in WTC 6?
www.internationalskeptics.com...



please list actual evidence that points to something other than WTC 6 damaged by the twin towers.



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 02:25 AM
link   
******BREAKING NEWS!!!******


Two year study moves into its fifth year!!!!!



At this point it just looks like Dr Hulsey is milking this until he retires



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 06:12 PM
link   
Wow, it’s already June 2019.

Any who.....

The two year WTC 7 study that started in 2015? That missed the draft dates of 2017 and 2018, is now slated for September 30th 2019?

Truther logic.
A two year study started in 2015 now has a release date of Monday, 9/30/2019?

I find it odd the date isn’t for 9/11/2019? Is the extra 19 days going to make that much of a difference after four years? I am guess this release date will come and go.....



A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7

ine.uaf.edu...

Project Dates
May 1, 2015 - September 30, 2019



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: mrthumpy
At this point it just looks like Dr Hulsey is milking this until he retires



Hulsey is no longer the Chair of the department. I wonder if he has stepped down to allow him to concentrate on finally getting this report out



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 06:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: mrthumpy

originally posted by: mrthumpy
At this point it just looks like Dr Hulsey is milking this until he retires



Hulsey is no longer the Chair of the department. I wonder if he has stepped down to allow him to concentrate on finally getting this report out


Do you know anything about the supposed setback from a hard drive crash a year or two back?



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 07:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: mrthumpy

originally posted by: mrthumpy
At this point it just looks like Dr Hulsey is milking this until he retires



Hulsey is no longer the Chair of the department. I wonder if he has stepped down to allow him to concentrate on finally getting this report out


Do you know anything about the supposed setback from a hard drive crash a year or two back?


Afraid not



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 11:28 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 21 2019 @ 01:27 AM
link   
Stop the presses!!!

Draft report scheduled for release in September!

Of course AE911 are asking for $50,000 to help get it out there



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join