Expert concludes Roy Moore wrote disputed entry in accuser's yearbook, lawyer says

a reply to: links234

Wow, fake news has garnered 15 flags...I would say we are NOT denying ignorance here. Some people want so much for something to be true that the truth becomes secondary.

a reply to: pavil

Don't worry , it's always the best move to go with the facts and find the truth.

The fools here are the ones who "know for a fact she made it all up"
and the ones who " know for a fact that he is a pedo"

None of us know what the truth is here we don't have all the facts.

a reply to: scraedtosleep


Seems like a Mandella shift has affected most of America this year. People used to be innocent until proven guilty. Franken is the only guilty one thus far.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

I understand all of that and can't disagree with where you're coming from. I'm simply saying that in this type of environment we are presently in, I think we're running a massive risk of losing innocent until proven guilty, and the court of public opinion is beginning to wield more power than the court system, which is very dangerous. Let's face it, bad, bad things have happened in American history when public opinion was allowed to trump the legal system. I'm talking Salem Witch Trials and even the KKK have been produced by such a movement. We need evidence more concrete than 40 years after the fact he said, she said.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

I'm not worried about that at all.
None of this is happening in a court and our opinions are not getting anyone arrested.
Now as far as people losing their jobs over accusations , that has been happening forever.
It's just human nature for us to judge each other. Innocent until proven guilty only applies in the courts.
Public opinion has always been guilty first. Especially when it comes to strangers being accused of evil #.

a reply to: links234

Yeah I think you are confused and like most liberal thinking people, very easily confused. The story which you attribute to Breitbart was actually broke by ABC with woman in question admitting she forged part of what was in the yearbook.

I really don't have any idea who is telling the truth in this story, however nothing from this woman can be believed, she destroyed her own credibility, much like you have just accomplished with that post you just made.

This is madness. She changed her story, bottom line. Does this mean the rest of her story is BS? No, of course not. But it doesn't help matters, and the fact she won't let an independent expert, not selected by her attorney, do an analysis of it speaks volumes imo.

Conyers is pretty much there too.....the people coming out against him are former staffers.

a reply to: annoyedpharmacist


no, it really doesn't, she's 100% open to analysis once everyone including moore are under oath. absolutely nothing wrong with that.

also, she didn't "change" her story, she simply read what was written including her notes.

ya'll are funny.. something big 'bout to happen?

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist


no, it really doesn't, she's 100% open to analysis once everyone including moore are under oath. absolutely nothing wrong with that.

also, she didn't "change" her story, she simply read what was written including her notes.

ya'll are funny.. something big 'bout to happen?

Why would Moore need to be under oath to get the hand writing analyzed by his expert?

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist


no, it really doesn't, she's 100% open to analysis once everyone including moore are under oath. absolutely nothing wrong with that.

also, she didn't "change" her story, she simply read what was written including her notes.

ya'll are funny.. something big 'bout to happen?

So she's so confident she doesn't need to totally prove her accusations before he becomes Senator?

Yeah.............

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist


no, it really doesn't, she's 100% open to analysis once everyone including moore are under oath. absolutely nothing wrong with that.

also, she didn't "change" her story, she simply read what was written including her notes.

ya'll are funny.. something big 'bout to happen?

So she's so confident she doesn't need to totally prove her accusations before he becomes Senator?

Yeah.............

I am going to go out on a limb here. If Moore loses, this all disappears, having served its purpose.

Double

a reply to: Flatfish

Wow...I hope you never pull jury duty. I watched the interview and I guess its what you want to hear. The problem I have is that she claimed something different at the first press conference.

As for the mall story, the managment company at the time denied that he was banned from the mall. The man was a prominent figure at the time, don't ya think that it would have made local headlines ?

Nary a story about it until 40 years later and now this lady changes her story. Her credibility is zero. And least we forget how democrats sponsored and championed a rapist and serial assault expert and his enabler for how many years now? Take you fake indignant attitude someplace else and realize you suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

DP

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
a reply to: links234
Um....... the woman has already admitted she faked the yearbook entry in an ABC interview.

ATS thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Roy Moore is a goddamn pedophile and the Republicans just love him, go figure.

Hillary is a self-admitted defender of a real pedophile she knew to be guilty and attacked the underage victim and got the pedophile off....a REAL pedophile...and the left not only loves Hillary but made her their FAILED candidate for President.

Yep.
Figures.
Left=deception for over 100 years, never mind the body count.

But go ahead, be proud......exposed....

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: links234

Wow, fake news has garnered 15 flags...I would say we are NOT denying ignorance here. Some people want so much for something to be true that the truth becomes secondary.

I don't see you saying the same thing in the other thread which was proven to be fake news. Selective outrage?

Roy Moore's accuser has admitted to faking the yearbook.

a reply to: links234

Whatever it takes to support an accused pedo, amirite?

So some numbers were written by her but the rest of the message was written by Moore yet I know many will say she faked the whole thing. Makes sense, faking someones handwriting by using two people to write one message.

Remember folks, a mall banned Moore because he was trolling for underage girls.

I do not look forward to Tuesday and learn that Alabama voted in a pedo because hey, at least he's not a Liberal and Trump needs votes for his garbage agendas!

Party of family and moral values everyone!

originally posted by: links234
Source

Moore for weeks has denied that the 1977 message was his handwriting and said he doesn't remember the woman, Beverly Young Nelson. But in a news conference Friday in Atlanta, attorney Gloria Allred said handwriting expert Arthur T. Anthony compared the yearbook signature to others by Moore in the years since and determined he wrote the decades-old entry.

The "expert" is one of only two accredited people in Georgia by The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners.

The expert was retained by Gloria Alred.

That is problematic.

So is the "victim" finally admitting she added stuff to the yearbook and failed to mention that when she made her claims publicly.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: links234
Source

Moore for weeks has denied that the 1977 message was his handwriting and said he doesn't remember the woman, Beverly Young Nelson. But in a news conference Friday in Atlanta, attorney Gloria Allred said handwriting expert Arthur T. Anthony compared the yearbook signature to others by Moore in the years since and determined he wrote the decades-old entry.

The "expert" is one of only two accredited people in Georgia by The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners.

The expert was retained by Gloria Alred.

That is problematic.

No it's not......according to the Left.