It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Moore for weeks has denied that the 1977 message was his handwriting and said he doesn't remember the woman, Beverly Young Nelson. But in a news conference Friday in Atlanta, attorney Gloria Allred said handwriting expert Arthur T. Anthony compared the yearbook signature to others by Moore in the years since and determined he wrote the decades-old entry.
originally posted by: links234
Source
Moore for weeks has denied that the 1977 message was his handwriting and said he doesn't remember the woman, Beverly Young Nelson. But in a news conference Friday in Atlanta, attorney Gloria Allred said handwriting expert Arthur T. Anthony compared the yearbook signature to others by Moore in the years since and determined he wrote the decades-old entry.
The "expert" is one of only two accredited people in Georgia by The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners.
Below it is written a date, "12-22-1977," and "Olde Hickory House," the restaurant where Young worked. Moore supporters used discrepancies in the handwriting between those notes and the message to bring the entry into question, but Young said she wrote the notes herself to remember when and where a man she respected wrote the message.
originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
a reply to: links234
Um....... the woman has already admitted she faked the yearbook entry in an ABC interview.
ATS thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: Grambler
That is ridiculous.
Until they allow an independent professional to look at this, I dont believe them.
This technique managed to spot the age of the ink on documents written up to five years previously and with an approximation margin of about 20%. In other words, when applying this analysis procedure, the team can indicate whether the document was written 1,500 days previously (just over four years) with a margin of 300 days either way. Until now, the passing of time was detected only in a very general way, in other words, it was possible to determine whether the document was young (whether it was less than 90 days old) or old (more than 2 years).
originally posted by: links234
a reply to: Grambler
It's amazing how conservative media released headlines proclaiming an admitted fake just hours before an analyst proclaimed the yearbook entry to be Roy Moore's handwriting. Almost as if they're trying to get the jump on the news...
a reply to: Quantumgamer1776
Did she? Because that's not what that Breitbart article says at all.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: links234
a reply to: Grambler
It's amazing how conservative media released headlines proclaiming an admitted fake just hours before an analyst proclaimed the yearbook entry to be Roy Moore's handwriting. Almost as if they're trying to get the jump on the news...
a reply to: Quantumgamer1776
Did she? Because that's not what that Breitbart article says at all.
What are you talking about?
The story that broke today was from ABC, you know, the left leaning MSM source that hates trump so much they just got caught making up a story to hurt him.
They interviewed the woman, who finally admitted that she wrote the bottom portion and had lied when she said (or her lawyer said Moore had wrote it all.
So in fct you have it backwards.
After this woman made herself look bad on a left wing source, her lawyer later comes out and says that an expert they chose says they are right.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: links234
a reply to: Grambler
It's amazing how conservative media released headlines proclaiming an admitted fake just hours before an analyst proclaimed the yearbook entry to be Roy Moore's handwriting. Almost as if they're trying to get the jump on the news...
a reply to: Quantumgamer1776
Did she? Because that's not what that Breitbart article says at all.
What are you talking about?
The story that broke today was from ABC, you know, the left leaning MSM source that hates trump so much they just got caught making up a story to hurt him.
They interviewed the woman, who finally admitted that she wrote the bottom portion and had lied when she said (or her lawyer said Moore had wrote it all.
So in fct you have it backwards.
After this woman made herself look bad on a left wing source, her lawyer later comes out and says that an expert they chose says they are right.
According to politofact that is totally wrong.
And yeah the news outlets jumped on a false story.
originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
a reply to: links234
Um....... the woman has already admitted she faked the yearbook entry in an ABC interview.
ATS thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Grambler
Yes where she said she made notes? She certainly doesn't say she forged the yearbook.
Could you show it? Word for word?
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Grambler
Yes where she said she made notes? She certainly doesn't say she forged the yearbook.
Could you show it? Word for word?
Please post where I said she forged the yearbook.
I said she originally said Moore wrote the whole thing, and has changed her story today to say she wrote the bottom part of it.
Show me how that is wrong.
Three weeks ago, Washington Post’s Philip Bump consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.”
originally posted by: eisegesis
I guess this will have to be explained as well.
Three weeks ago, in a partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, the left-wing Washington Post’s Philip Bump (already a proven liar) consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.”
www.washingtonpost.com... rm=.38258b602ab2
The problem is, Nelson has admitted to adding "notes," under Moore's signature. If the "writing seems consistent with one writer" and Nelson has admitted to what she added, this whole thing is one big inconsistent mess.
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
a reply to: links234
Um....... the woman has already admitted she faked the yearbook entry in an ABC interview.
ATS thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...
She admitted no such thing. You’ve been reading too much Brietbart.
She said she wrote “notes” under Roy Moore’s message and signature. I watched the interview and it was clear that she was talking about the date and the name of the restaurant, (Old Hickory House) where she worked.
Roy Moore probably used the restaurant as a hunting ground for under age girls, just like he did the local mall. At least up until they barred him.
Roy Moore is a goddamn pedophile and the Republicans just love him, go figure.