It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
If you arent going to worry about legal standards then why debate me on the topic?
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives states that:
The term "firearm" is defined in the Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. Section 921(a)(3), to include "(A) any weapon (including a starter gun), which will, or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon...."
Based on Section 921(a)(3), air guns, because they use compressed air and not an explosive to expel a projectile, do not constitute firearms under Federal law — unless they are manufactured with the frames or receivers of an actual firearm. Accordingly, the domestic sale and possession of air guns is normally unregulated under the Federal firearms laws enforced by ATF
Link
As I said IA investigations only investigate policy violations.
originally posted by: roadgravel
As I said IA investigations only investigate policy violations.
And a policy violation could occur in a situation such as this.
A pellet gun is not fire arm so waving one isn't waving a fire arm. A man flapping his arms doen't make him an airplane, even if he is wearing an airplane costume.
Although the federal government does not normally regulate air guns, some state and local governments do; the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence has compiled a list of states and selected municipalities that regulate air guns, finding that 23 states and the District of Columbia regulate air guns to some degree.[31] Two states (New Jersey and Rhode Island) define all non-powder guns as firearms; one state (Illinois) defines certain high-power and/or large calibre non-powder guns as firearms; three states (Connecticut, Delaware and North Dakota) define non-powder guns as dangerous weapons (but not firearms).[31] The remaining states which regulate air guns impose age restrictions on possession, use, or transfer of non-powder guns, and/or explicitly regulate possession of non-powder guns on school grounds.[31]
New York City has a restrictive municipal ordinance regulating air guns.[31] Air guns were previously banned in San Francisco, but a state preemption statute struck down the ban, and the San Francisco District Attorney declared them legal as long as in compliance with state law.[32]
New York state law prohibits anyone under the age of 16 from possessing an air gun.[citation needed]
Along with state laws, local county laws or ordinances may be relevant to users of air guns. Generally, state laws do not mention air gun laws, but local counties do.[citation needed]
originally posted by: roadgravel
As I said IA investigations only investigate policy violations.
And a policy violation could occur in a situation such as this.
A pellet gun is not fire arm so waving one isn't waving a fire arm. A man flapping his arms doen't make him an airplane, even if he is wearing an airplane costume.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Pretty sad you need to explain that, the justification for this shooting is poor .
Looks like X will need some back up to convince us civilians it was a good shoot.
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Xcathdra
Wouldn't the classification of firearm be based on the velocity? it is here..over 500 fps is classified a firearm, under is not classified as such.
I have read the statute you posted..CO2 is not an explosive.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Pretty sad you need to explain that, the justification for this shooting is poor .
Looks like X will need some back up to convince us civilians it was a good shoot.
I dont need to. The jury, who found the officer not guilty, already took care of that. Given the issues recently in Australia and your law enforcement maybe you should stick to your own home country problems before weighing in on ours while acting as if Australia law enforcement is the end all be all to law enforcement on the planet.