It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: TinfoilTP
totally
The symbolic vote had been expected to fail in the Republican-controlled House. It put some lawmakers in competitive districts in a tough spot by forcing them on the record about impeachment.
Lawmakers did not actually vote on the actual articles of impeachment, but on a procedural measure that would have led to a vote on them.
your source
were you super stoked when you started this thread?
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Or Trump is part of their gang acting like he's against them.
But yeah, they're afraid to vote against him but more than willing to damage their re-election chances by talking crap about him 24/7.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Or Trump is part of their gang acting like he's against them.
But yeah, they're afraid to vote against him but more than willing to damage their re-election chances by talking crap about him 24/7.
They wanted Hillary not Trump, did you miss that part between all their tears?
It is mainly their Party leaders with the rhetoric, which is supposed to represent their positions. They talk a big talk but cannot produce the votes.
Maybe they need better leaders that actually represent what the vast majority of Democrats represent not just the elite. If they went back to representing middle class America and uplifting the poor instead of turning everyone poor then forgetting them, their Party might return to being American. Now it is just a cesspool of globalist interests.
originally posted by: whyamIhere
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: TinySickTears
*You're
Capitalize the "E" in "Exactly".
...was there seriously a need to point that out? No, hence, nobody cares.
ahahahaha.
owned me.
there was a point but you didnt get it.
its cool.
how many errors in that^^^btw?
Well, there's Capitalization, sentence fragments, text language.
Who's counting ?
That's three.
đł
In his memo to lawmakers, Green didnât allege âobstruction of justiceâ or reference the ongoing investigation into the 2016 presidential campaignâs connection with Russia.
Instead, Green highlighted Trumpâs supposed association with âWhite Nationalism, Neo-Nazism and Hate,â as well as âInciting Hatred and Hostility,â as offenses worthy of impeachment.
âFriends, whether we like it or not, we now have a bigot in the White House who incites hatred and hostility,â Green wrote in a letter.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: TinfoilTP
The symbolic vote had been expected to fail in the Republican-controlled House. It put some lawmakers in competitive districts in a tough spot by forcing them on the record about impeachment.
Lawmakers did not actually vote on the actual articles of impeachment, but on a procedural measure that would have led to a vote on them.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: TinfoilTP
The RATIONAL House members don't want to be on record as attempting to Impeach the most successful U.S. President in this country's history.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: TinfoilTP
The RATIONAL House members don't want to be on record as attempting to Impeach the most successful U.S. President in this country's history.
Yup, it's all about reelection. After the midterms they hope to be back with lipstick all puckered up for their Commander in Chief.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
lawmakers immediately voted to effectively kill his resolution, with 364 voting to table it and 58 Democrats voting to move ahead.
Source
Well that didn't go well did it, lol.
I thought all the Dems were on the same page in hating Trump, they could only get 58 votes......something is off with this reality of votes and what is portrayed by the Dem Party in the MSM.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: carewemust
Most successful? By what criteria?
Don't get me wrong, while I may not particularly like the man, he's not done a horrible job. But "most successful" seems a bit premature...
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: carewemust
Most successful? By what criteria?
Don't get me wrong, while I may not particularly like the man, he's not done a horrible job. But "most successful" seems a bit premature...