It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Shamrock6
An unnamed source says Comey got immunity and now an unnamed source says it's been yanked. Or was it ever actually verified that immunity had been given?
True Pundit's unnamed reporter, reddit, and 4chan are the only places I see this story. Doesn't exactly scream "legit" to me but who knows.
Hence my caveat in my op - "If true".
ATS is littered with OPs citing True Pundits with the caveat "if it's true" and it never is true. Unless True Pundit is aggregating it from somewhere else (they're a mixture).
At some point I hope that folks will catch on that True Pundit is about as credible as Sorcha Faal.
LINDSEY GRAHAM: No. I think Comey needs to answer questions as his time as director. I think he made some decisions that they were really very, very wrong. I would just say this with the president. There's an ongoing criminal investigation; Comey may be part of it. You tweet and comment regarding ongoing criminal investigations at your own peril. I'd be careful if I were you, Mr. President. I'd watch this.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
No it has not. Stop.
The special counsel investigating possible links between Russia and the Trump presidential campaign has cleared former FBI Director James Comey to testify before a congressional committee about his contacts with President Trump, according to an associate close to Comey.
Comey met with Robert S. Mueller III, whom the Justice Department appointed on May 17 to investigate any Russian ties to the Trump campaign, and Mueller said he had no problems with Comey's testifying, the associate said.
originally posted by: CynConcepts
I don't remember Comey getting any immunity deal for himself. I do remember Comey gave quite a number of immunity deals during his 2016 investigation of Clinton and associates. Is it is possible that this source was misinterpreted. That Mueller is actually nullifying Comey's previous immunity deals due to the fact that it appears the DOJ and FBI scuttled the actual investigation?
Edit add: is that even possible? I will admit that I am not fluent on law details.
Sara A. CarterVerified account @SaraCarterDC
27m27 minutes ago
MY LATEST: FBI supervisor removed from Special Counsel's Office had interviewed Michael Flynn
A supervisory special agent who is now under scrutiny after being removed from Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel’s Office for alleged bias against President Trump also oversaw the bureau’s interviews of embattled former National Security advisor Michael Flynn, this reporter has learned. Flynn recently pled guilty to one-count of lying to the FBI last week.
FBI agent Peter Strzok was one of two FBI agents who interviewed Flynn, which took place on Jan. 24, at the White House, said several sources. The other FBI special agent, who interviewed Flynn, is described by sources as a field supervisor in the “Russian Squad, at the FBI’s Washington Field Office,” according to a former intelligence official, with knowledge of the interview.
Strzok was removed from his role in the Special Counsel’s Office after it was discovered he had made disparaging comments about President Trump in text messages between him and his alleged lover FBI attorney Lisa Page, according to the New York Times and Washington Post, which first reported the stories. Strzok is also under investigation by the Department of Justice Inspector General for his role in Hillary Clinton’s email server and the ongoing investigation into Russia’s election meddling. On Saturday, the House Intelligence Committee’s Chairman Devin Nunes chided the Justice Department and the FBI for not disclosing why Strzok had been removed from the Special Counsel three months ago, according to a statement given by the Chairman.
The former U.S. intelligence official told this reporter, “with the recent revelation that Strzok was removed from the Special Counsel investigation for making anti-Trump text messages it seems likely that the accuracy and veracity of the 302 of Flynn’s interview as a whole should be reviewed and called into question.”
“The most logical thing to happen would be to call the other FBI Special Agent present during Flynn’s interview before the Grand Jury to recount his version,” the former intelligence official added.
The former official also said that “Strzok’s allegiance to (Deputy Director Andrew) McCabe was unwavering and very well known.”
originally posted by: BlackJackal
Currently only TruePundit.com is reporting this story. The site has a reputation for being loose with facts so I will wait until another site picks up the story before I believe it.
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Hi op is funny how your thread started out that you where not too sure how much this story could be true because of the source, and now that the circle jerkers have entered your thread your singing a different song.
Why being that the repblicans run both house and senate, why is nothing being done to put all those evil liberals in jail.