It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A plane from 40,000ft & above?

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 11:59 AM
link   
Maybe I am just a bad googler.

Been looking for a photo — better yet, photos? .. taken from ground of planes planes flying 40,000ft or higher.

My brother and I are in flat earth debate. I’m not a flat earther but can’t find photos taken from ground even though I see a high 30s to 40 every other day and have never taken photos. He says we will not be able to see a plane 40,000ft or above!

Not asking for a win. I am, I’m lying.. (I wanna) in a truthful way.

Any photos?

Cheers, guys & girls.
edit on 09/02/2012 by KaelemJames because: (no reason given)

edit on 09/02/2012 by KaelemJames because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:04 PM
link   
a reply to: KaelemJames

You probably wouldn't see the plane itself as much as the contrail left behind it.



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:06 PM
link   
a reply to: KaelemJames

If you're not a Flat Earther.. you've already won.
Brian Shul was an SR-71 pilot. He's flown at 80,000+ FT.



If that does not satify... look at some Balloon launches on YT. Kill 2 birds with one stone for Flat Earthers and Religious nuts with this photo..😁🙄



edit on 3-12-2017 by Bigburgh because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: KaelemJames

You're more likely to get out the cockpit shots from a U-2. Barring a telescope there aren't many lenses that will get an even remotely decent shot of something that high.



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

I thank you for your honesty, even if I don’t like it
I do appreciate it. God bless.

Still, gotta be a 40,000+ footer photo out there.



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:13 PM
link   
a reply to: KaelemJames

Do you want up close, or far away?



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:14 PM
link   
Noa reply to: Bigburgh

No, I am not a flat earther.

I thank you very much!

edit on 09/02/2012 by KaelemJames because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:15 PM
link   
a reply to: KaelemJames

i has numerous pics of aircraft " at altitude " - most taken with a full frame DSLR and lens focal length of 300 > 500mm

unfortunatly - i has no idea which - if any is " above 40K feet " - but all are betwwn 25 and 45k feet - cos thats the " operating range " of regular commercial traffic

if your alledged brother - is a typical flat tard - it will not accept a photo

the " best " you can hope for is to down load free version of a flight tracking app to a smart phone - and drag it out side - then listen to the bat-crap crazy escuses it comes up wuith to " explain " why it rejects the evidence thsat the aircraft you are looking at is not at the altitude the flight track app says it is



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Just a plane 40,000ft up.

No matter.



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:19 PM
link   
Just took these...



Zaphod here👍



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: KaelemJames



787-8, Brisbane-Bangkok, 40,000 feet.

cqplanespotting.blogspot.com...
edit on 12/3/2017 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:23 PM
link   
a reply to: KaelemJames

Spaceship 2 and carrier at 46,600ft:

cdn.cnn.com...

Shuttle SRB separation at roughly 200,000ft:

i.ytimg.com...

ISS in LEO at 1,341,120ft:

www.universetoday.com...
edit on 3-12-2017 by Sammamishman because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Zaph you hit the wrong button😆👍
Fix your AVI...



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:26 PM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Well, he’s my bro, so not saying he’s a tard. Everyone for himself.

I laugh at FE’s arguments and so tired of debates. Then he threw the 40,000ft plane seen from earth question today.

I’m there, earth is not flat. My belief.



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Bigburgh

Thank you!!!

God bless.



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Bigburgh

I can't. It doesn't show on mobile so it'll have to wait. Maybe tonight.



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:32 PM
link   
a reply to: KaelemJames

It's not convincing. But you're most welcome.



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

This guy is laughing very hard😆




posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Sammamishman

Love these! Thanks!



posted on Dec, 3 2017 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: KaelemJames

if your alledged brother - is a typical flat tard - it will not accept a photo




This is pretty much all the OP needs to know. Nothing will convince him, you're wasting your time. It's like arguing with 9/11 truthers.




top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join