one more interesting video that needs analysis

I'm not used to seeing a UFO up so close like this. Straight away the alarm bells are ringing. Normally it's wobbly & grainy. I want to say real, but a model of some sort is most likely the answer to this one.

looks like it cuts after seeing the airplane then cuts again as it pans back to the airplane lol fake

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

spot on

found the original www.youtube.com...

2015 footage, seriously stop posting old crap

a reply to: dan121212

There's nothing wrong in posting old videos. To me this was the first time I saw the video, so if humanoidlord hadn't post the video I (and I'm sure several other members) wouldn't have seen it.

As for the older version you found (nice job), it looks like the version from the OP (and the one I found) were somewhat stabilized, as they do not show that shakiness. The shakiness itself makes me think even more of a hoax, as it doesn't look natural, it looks limited to a maximum value of movement that is never exceeded.

a lit up air traffic control tower ??

originally posted by: intrptr
Too much copyright infringement from Close Encounters.

That was my first thought when I watched the video

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: humanoidlord

Here's the original video. No noticeable differences between the two.



It can be CGI, as we never see the UFO and the ground at the same time, there's a moment with just a black screen that would be an easy way of cutting from fake (either CGI or a made object, like a toy) UFO image to the airport image.

I am thinking that video is real footage of the Flight Tower at the airport, with editing to add the colored lights moving on it in spooky UFO style.

a reply to: rhynouk

i am also thinking drone, weird aircraft

a reply to: dan121212

not so soon

a reply to: dan121212

nice it has sound
now it looks even more like an interseting footage

a reply to: dan121212

why?
people cant stop ranting about roswell
wich happened 70 years ago
just because i posted it now, doesnt mean its new
real ufo footage is very hard to come by

a reply to: ArMaP

thanks friend!
also actually this new footage looks more reaslistisc than the one i found
the shakiness looks natural to me

a reply to: dannylightning

nope
where is the "tower" part?
i am pretty sure they have lights

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

unless someone analyses the video better, i am still going with drone

I thought it was going to be the video in this link news story
Any ideas about this one?

a reply to: Woody510

that one is actually from 2012
and it showns either a bunch of flares or an real ufo

One more bad video that means nothing. At this point, it's so easy to fake UFO footage, unless you get radar returns and press hits like the Chicago Airport UFO, you are peddling dirt.

a reply to: Nicorette

whoa! chill down
i aint saying this is the smoking gun we have been waiting for!