It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Perhaps you should call those that don't believe - 'Unbelievers'.
Why? Flat earthers is what they are as they (and you) argue against a spheroid and for a flat earth.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Perhaps you should call those that don't believe - 'Unbelievers'.
Why? Flat earthers is what they are as they (and you) argue against a spheroid and for a flat earth.
I don't believe the official story - that does not automatically make me a 'flat earther'.
If you feel the need to put me in a box with a label on it - mark it 'unbeliever in official story'.
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: TerryDon79
Yes. You just have to apply the "Duck Test".
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: TerryDon79
No, but have a cigar anyway.
originally posted by: Akragon
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: SolAquarius
Magic.
More gravity magic...
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ignorant_ape
ok - i shall bite
but first - please explain why you insist on dragging NASA into a thread about the shape of the earth ?
NASA is the organisation which has displayed images of a spherical earth. Who else has claimed to be high enough up?
But the images are CGI.
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: Phage
no... it gets worse
Stars are "lights" in the sky... including planets... apparently we don't know what they actually are...
Oh yes... it gets much... Much worse
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Who is going to explain why wires and harnesses are being used in the space station?
but if you actually compare the two models it is not so easy to dismiss
Everyone is indoctrinated - told what is 'fact'