It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kashai
So here is the problem.
One consideration to life like us would include realistically all the mass extinction events that occurred on Earth and could seriously have a lot to do as to why we are having this conversation.
Thoughts?
Gamma-ray burst linked to mass extinction
Some 440 million years ago, a nearby gamma-ray burst may have extinguished much of life on Earth, say US astronomers1.
Adrian Melott, of the University of Kansas in Lawrence, and colleagues reckon that the fossil record of the end of the Ordovician period fits with how such a cosmic explosion a few thousand light years away could have altered the environment. At that time, more than 100 families of marine invertebrates died out; it was the second most devastating mass extinction in our planet's history.
originally posted by: seagull
The equation is over fifty years old, please remember that.
It's based on what was known, and presumed, at that time. Nor was it meant to be the be all, end all, of the question. It was only ever meant as a stimulus of discussion.
Every part of the equation is a variable. There's nothing concrete about it. It's only real validity is as a conversation starter.
"Why did you use that number instead of this number?" Etc...
originally posted by: Kashai
Scientists have finally succeeded in studying the development of a tiny Swedish worm. Its mouth and its anus are in the same spot and the worm is a primitive form of man.
originally posted by: Phantom423
But after all the calcs and recalcs, it still goes back to Fermi's Paradox: "Where is everybody?"