It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Death of White Supremacy: 95 yrs ago TutanKhamun tomb was first opened by Archaeologists

page: 1
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:15 PM
link   
The Peace of God to all that belong to the Light,
Dear Readers,

Today about 95 years ago archaeologists entered first time to the tomb of the Child Pharaoh Tutankhamen, it was the first time a completely sealed Royal Egyptian tomb was found in modern times, luckily it was not profaned by tomb thieves.

Possibly this was not a really nice event if you are respectful of dead people but it opened the door to understand Egyptian past as not other discovery, it was literally as a Star gate opened toward a past 3300 years ago to the time of the very first great civilization of the world. The tomb was not going to be unsealed until February 16th 1923 though.

Pls Check:
www.history.com...

There are many aspects to underline of this so crucial discovery for archaeology in general and for Egyptology in particular, but perhaps one that made this so famous was the mysterious sequence of multiple strange synchronicities that were triggered around it that supported the legend of its curse.

Pls check:
www.documentarytube.com...

It is meaningful that it was an European British Archaeologist who made this finding, Howard Carter, since by that time many countries of the British Empire, and even the already independent America were nations under strict segregation not only against one ethnic group but anything that was not Caucasian.

This was a major discovery about an African Civilization that preceded almost any other in History, but certainly Greece and then all European ones.

Tutankhamen face features match easier with the ones of Nubian black race than with any other of the ancient Egypt. The topic remains still on debate specially in circles where racism is prevalent or the myth of the White supremacy is a dogma.

Please check:
mailstar.net...

This so important finding anniversary comes to our attention since it contrasts a lot with respect to today's politics in which there is an exacerbation in the world of racism, extreme nationalisms and even revival of fascism claims for a humanity that thought to have already overcome those chapters of ignorance long time ago in the night of the times.

Thanks for your attention,

The Angel of Lightness

edit on 11/26/2017 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)



+19 more 
posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: The angel of light
Tutankhamen face features match easier with the ones of Nubian black race than with any other of the ancient Egypt. The topic remains still on debate specially in circles where racism is prevalent or the myth of the White supremacy is a dogma.


The only DNA study on remains of Egyptians of that era show they are more closely related to people of the Levant and the Middle East than Sub-Saharan peoples.


The specimens were living in a period stretching from the late New Kingdom to the Roman era (1388 BCE–426 CE). Complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences were obtained for 90 of the mummies and were compared with each other and with several other ancient and modern datasets. The scientists found that the ancient Egyptian individuals in their own dataset possessed highly similar mitochondrial profiles throughout the examined period. Modern Egyptians generally shared this maternal haplogroup pattern, but also carried more Sub-Saharan African clades. However, analysis of the mummies' mtDNA haplogroups found that they shared greater mitochondrial affinities with modern populations from the Near East and the Levant compared to modern Egyptians. Additionally, three of the ancient Egyptian individuals were analysed for Y-DNA, and were observed to bear paternal lineages that are common in both the Middle East and North Africa. Source



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I am so sorry dear Augustus Masonicus,

Which Egyptians are your referring to? the Semitic slaves of the Pharaoh? the Canaanean traders in that land by that time? or perhaps the Hitite mercenaries in their army? or their Greek international students in their universities? the foreign scholars in the library of Alexandria?

Only being blind somebody cannot see that the lips of the mouth of Tutankhamen thickness say more than tons of racist claims anybody can manufacture, in spite of the effort to make up them, also they say more than tons of decadent Hollywood films trying to rewrite History with white actors.

They are thick and voluptuous enough to overcome any claim that he had inflammation of mouth due to the poison he took, without knowing of course, and that must likely caused his death.

What about the dimension of the base of his nose? his nose is really so ample, generous in width, eons from the super thin ones of today's beauty contest cannons or plastic surgery standards.

Neither his funerary mask and sarcophagus have any precious or semiprecious stones on the eyes to suggest he had blue or green ones, it is clear his iris are black or at least very dark brown.


Anyway it was a good try,

Happy Thanksgiving weekend,

The Angel of Lightness
edit on 11/26/2017 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:40 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus


You forgot to mention the whole Mason™ connection.

Remind Doorman Dave to give 3 extra whacks w/that one paddle...



+32 more 
posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: The angel of light
Which Egyptians are your referring to?


The ones discussed in the source which you didn't read since you have a rather sad predilection for fabricating facts.



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I don't need to read biased bibliography to interpret a finding, why I am going to need third hand opinions when the archaeological evidence is all in the light to be checked?

observation is must on scientific method, when a theory is in conflict with what the data that is gathered directly in the finding any serious research mind rejects what have been false hypotheses and moves one to a new paradigm.

Of course Egypt was a very diverse nation since that time, but we are talking about the 14 century before Christ, what we are discussing here is the ethnic characteristics of its rulers in that period, not the beauty of the Ptolomean ethnically Greek Cleopatra of the time of Jules Cesar.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness


+20 more 
posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: The angel of light
I don't need to read biased bibliography to interpret a finding...


I didn't ask you to read a bibliography, it was a DNA study of actual human remains from that era performed by three people who are well-versed in the field as opposed to your amateurish personal observations.

Here's another link to the source which you can willfully ingnore like all the other ones you are given.







edit on 26-11-2017 by AugustusMasonicus because: Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn


+23 more 
posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:55 PM
link   
I, personally, would like to know what (if anything) this story in the OP has to do with white supremacy? Let alone its "death"?

Please OP, explain this for me.



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Let's talk straight forward,

There were in between hundreds of thousands to millions of different people living in that geographic region by that time, don't go around with more distraction sophisms.

I know very well your deceiving tactics, your ability in rhetoric, this is not a contest of who bring more 'sources', is a straight forward analysis of archaeological and forensic evidence. I don't need any snob white American freemason to lecture me on these topics.

What is certainly pretty amateur is to look in all the genome of Egypt to decide which one we are going to accept and when are we going to reject, according with our personal prejudgments, when the evidence that really matters, the one of his tomb, shows something that can not be denied at all.

Even considering him as partially Semitic or Moorish it is pretty evident that it shocks with the stereotypes that have dominated recreations of Ancient Egypt in the last 100 years.


If he looked as Dark Arabic, Moorish or Semitic olive skinned man it also would be out of the boundaries of racial superiority in the claims of furious white supremacists fundamentalists who also gave agitated anti-Semitism in southern States for many decades.

Have you ever seen an excellent Egyptian actor like Omar Shariff interpreting Pharaohs roles in Hollywood movies? Hollywood preceded even the Russian born Yul Bryner before to consider him.

Shariff was considered for Egyptian servant, soldier, adviser or Minister perhaps, but the stellar roles were always for very white stars, he was even first considered for modern Arab, Arab immigrant in France, Russian physician or even Russian Boyard or Tsar than for interpreting in films the King of his very own land.

That was the price he must pay for his olive skin and dark eyes in spite of all his talent.


The Angel of Lightness

edit on 11/26/2017 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)


+24 more 
posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: The angel of light
...this is not a contest of who bring more 'sources', is a straight forward analysis of archaeological and forensic evidence.


DNA is forensic evidence.

What's your 'source'? Your opinion?

You're always good for a few laughs.



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

Easy to answer:

Just check the versions that Hollywood has manufactured along decades about the past of Egypt, compare them with this finding and that is all the answer you need.

Why there was no single African American actor ever called to interpret any Pharaoh role in any of those super productions?

How about the olive skinned Arabic, Hispanic, Latin or Jewish guys?

It is not that they were just few not white European look Pharaoh's in Hollywood productions, it was that none at all was never considered for those characters by the so called factory of dreams, well perhaps it is better to call it machine of racist brainwashing, of a bunch of lies and probably some nightmares.

Just think on that simple very meaningful detail.

The Angel of Lightness
edit on 11/26/2017 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)


+7 more 
posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: Krakatoa

Easy to answer:

Just check the versions that Hollywood has manufactured along decades about the past of Egypt, compare them with this finding and that is all the answer you need.

Why there was no single African American actor ever called to interpret any Pharaoh role in any of those super productions?

Just think on that simple very meaningful detail.

The Angel of Lightness


Well for one, it is Hollywood....and inherently not factual. Not a great source to use IMO.

Secondly, the DNA clearly shows that the mummified remains of the period in question distinctly originates from the middle eastern region and not sub Saharan origins.

Again, it has zero to do with white supremacy other than some feeble attempt at race baiting using unrelated sources based upon mere "faith" on you being correct in your uneducated assumptions.



edit on 11/26/2017 by Krakatoa because: (no reason given)


+5 more 
posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:05 PM
link   
I just did a search on the Tut, and went to the images and forty or fifty pictures of the gold faced boy King turned up. He certainly does not look Negroid, or did they photoshop all of them ? He has a narrow nose and his mouth looks like the average Caucasian.

Sorry, just my observation.



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: The angel of light


Why there was no single African American actor ever called to interpret any Pharaoh role in any of those super productions?


Probably because a, it’s a movie and b, he wasn’t a black African American.



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: Krakatoa

Easy to answer:

Just check the versions that Hollywood has manufactured along decades about the past of Egypt, compare them with this finding and that is all the answer you need.

Why there was no single African American actor ever called to interpret any Pharaoh role in any of those super productions?

it is not that they were just few, it was that none at all was never considered for those characters by the so called factory of dreams, well perhaps it is better to call it machine of brains wash, of a bunch of lies and probably some nightmares.

Just think on that simple very meaningful detail.

The Angel of Lightness


So you just disproved your title, good job.



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:09 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

c. There little reason to think that an African American actor would have any particular insights into the role.



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Plotus

The OP seems to be basing his “observation” on the image of the death mask.

Shame he hasn’t read further and found the death mask wasn’t a likeness to King Tut (found through testing and facial reconstruction).


+7 more 
posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Plotus


Shhhhh, don't tell the Original Poster about the facial reconstruction they did on Tut:



They white washed him, or should I say, brown washed him.



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TerryDon79

c. There little reason to think that an African American actor would have any particular insights into the role.


Just as much as any white, Chinese or purple alien in today’s culture



posted on Nov, 26 2017 @ 04:13 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I’m sure that Denzel Washington’s twin!

Just look at the similarities in skin colour.

/sarc




top topics



 
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join