It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

12 failed theories about AGW?

page: 4
11
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 28 2017 @ 12:08 PM
link   
a reply to: wtbengineer

Yeah. It would work. But why not just charge a battery? It's easier.




posted on Nov, 28 2017 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

May be easier but not cheaper...



posted on Nov, 28 2017 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: wtbengineer

Maybe. The storage of hydrogen is problematic though.
www.fsec.ucf.edu...

How much daylight do you figure it would take to get 300 miles worth of hydrogen?

Let's say you want 5kg of H2 for that 300 miles. Through electrolysis, it takes 9kg of (pure) water to get 1 kg of H2. So we need to split 45kg of water (45 liters). It takes about 13 MJ to electrolysize 1 liter of water, so we need about 585 MJ for 45 liters. That converts to 162 kwh.

Let's use a 20 square meter PV array to start with. Under good conditions you can get about 3 kw out of that array. So, 54 hours (at least).

edit on 11/28/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 28 2017 @ 02:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Yes, that was the problem that was identified at the time. You'd have to leave your car parked for several days, assuming those days are adequately sunny, before you could make a trip. Would take some kind of serious advance in solar.



posted on Dec, 1 2017 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

The science says that global warming is a combination of all anthropogenic atmospheric changes (some are heating and some are cooling, with the balance towards heating) and land use changes. CO2 is the biggest of quite a number though and has a long term influence, but it isn't the only one.

Global warming can be lowered by reducing some non-CO2 gases/particles as well and paying attention to albedo.
edit on 1-12-2017 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2017 @ 06:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: iTruthSeeker

97% of scientists agree that the fudged data shows that climate warming is a bought and paid for study.

1. 100% of scientists were given globalist agenda organization faulty models they all ran which would of course output the desired results regardless of the inputs.

2. To be certain the fudged model worked, falsified data was given to plug into those provided invalid models.

3. 3% were not lazy, double checked the models and the data finding both invalid and a deliberate fraud.



posted on Dec, 1 2017 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: tkwasny

The planet isn't getting warmer?



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join