posted on Dec, 4 2017 @ 02:43 PM
a reply to: network dude
dude, I respect you too. Lots! I don't think I'm claiming "secret knowledge" although if I'm coming across that way I need to be more clear.
Yes, I've looked at this pretty hard. My opinions could be wrong, sure, but this isn't a subject that I only have some "throwaway" opinions on even if
it sounds like that because I'm not engaging like I do on some other subjects.
The two deciding reasons I don't engage are A.) the issue is resistant to empirical falsification or empirical proof...no matter which side of the
issue one falls on and, B.) I don't wanna have the same "contrail" argument over and over with some folk.
Lastly, my research and personal interpretation of my observations is settled for me. I didn't come to my conclusions lightly or quickly. It really
is, intellectually, a stalemate and as such I don't want to spend the significant amount of hours it would take to make a complete argument on this
I've grappled with all of the issues on the subject and don't think there's any from the sceptical side that I haven't brought an open mind too.
Having said that: Have you dug into my question about what some of the Manhattan Project geniuses were pursuing both before and after WWII? Like I
said, the science is settled on the feasibility of weaponized weather. Plenty of white papers on the subject by some great minds before it goes