TIME Magazine refutes Trump's claim that he turned down 2017 Person of the Year award

The only thing that we should take away from all of this is that Hillary is not the president.

👍👍

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Right, #1.. it's a brilliant deflection strategy, or #2 ..he has a bigly personality disorder.
My $ is on #2

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope


if your take on it is possible couldnt it also be possible he is lying?




I never said he’s not lying. I am saying it is possible that he is not.

youre right. it is possible. thats why i posted and asked as much in the OP. wanted to make sure i was reading it right.
but as asked above. which is more likely?

he is lying and it did not happen or it did and it is miscommunication at time?

It is more likely that Trump had a conversation of that sort.

Remember the lie about the NFL and the debates?

Presidential candidate Donald Trump doesn’t like the fact that two of the three scheduled debates conflict with NFL prime-time games. He claimed in an interview with ABC’s This Week that the NFL sent him a letter calling the move “ridiculous.” The league called him on it, saying no letter was sent.

Link

He has publicly lied like this before, which is one of the reasons why I find it hard to believe him here.

Your article expresses the same sentiment:

Regardless, someone provided Trump with open and obvious information about the scheduling of two debates on nights when the NFL typically plays games: Sunday and Monday. That’s a long way from an official effort to get the debates moved that was reduced to writing, printed on NFL letterhead, and signed by Roger Goodell or some other high-level league executive.

It is likely Time didn’t ask him officially. But it is probable that someone familiar with Trump kicked the idea around with him.

Then it's still a lie. Twisting the truth and altering certain parts of a story is still lying.

At this stage in the game, Trump is the spam and his supporters are the Vikings.

a reply to: underwerks

Or....Time did indeed call him but given his response retracted their dung. ...
Or .. he was daydreaming on opiods while his team was working hard.....
Or... he was bored and thought: let's put thanksgiving on it's head. ....
Or...

fill in the blancs depending on your Bias.

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope


if your take on it is possible couldnt it also be possible he is lying?




I never said he’s not lying. I am saying it is possible that he is not.

youre right. it is possible. thats why i posted and asked as much in the OP. wanted to make sure i was reading it right.
but as asked above. which is more likely?

he is lying and it did not happen or it did and it is miscommunication at time?

It is more likely that Trump had a conversation of that sort.

Remember the lie about the NFL and the debates?

Presidential candidate Donald Trump doesn’t like the fact that two of the three scheduled debates conflict with NFL prime-time games. He claimed in an interview with ABC’s This Week that the NFL sent him a letter calling the move “ridiculous.” The league called him on it, saying no letter was sent.

Link

He has publicly lied like this before, which is one of the reasons why I find it hard to believe him here.

Your article expresses the same sentiment:

Regardless, someone provided Trump with open and obvious information about the scheduling of two debates on nights when the NFL typically plays games: Sunday and Monday. That’s a long way from an official effort to get the debates moved that was reduced to writing, printed on NFL letterhead, and signed by Roger Goodell or some other high-level league executive.

It is likely Time didn’t ask him officially. But it is probable that someone familiar with Trump kicked the idea around with him.

Then it's still a lie. Twisting the truth and altering certain parts of a story is still lying.

Kind of like you saying Time refuted his claim.

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Right, #1.. it's a brilliant deflection strategy, or #2 ..he has a bigly personality disorder.
My $ is on #2

It’s pronounced “big league”. The odds are never in your favour.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope


if your take on it is possible couldnt it also be possible he is lying?




I never said he’s not lying. I am saying it is possible that he is not.

youre right. it is possible. thats why i posted and asked as much in the OP. wanted to make sure i was reading it right.
but as asked above. which is more likely?

he is lying and it did not happen or it did and it is miscommunication at time?

It is more likely that Trump had a conversation of that sort.

Remember the lie about the NFL and the debates?

Presidential candidate Donald Trump doesn’t like the fact that two of the three scheduled debates conflict with NFL prime-time games. He claimed in an interview with ABC’s This Week that the NFL sent him a letter calling the move “ridiculous.” The league called him on it, saying no letter was sent.

Link

He has publicly lied like this before, which is one of the reasons why I find it hard to believe him here.

Your article expresses the same sentiment:

Regardless, someone provided Trump with open and obvious information about the scheduling of two debates on nights when the NFL typically plays games: Sunday and Monday. That’s a long way from an official effort to get the debates moved that was reduced to writing, printed on NFL letterhead, and signed by Roger Goodell or some other high-level league executive.

It is likely Time didn’t ask him officially. But it is probable that someone familiar with Trump kicked the idea around with him.

Then it's still a lie. Twisting the truth and altering certain parts of a story is still lying.

Kind of like you saying Time refuted his claim.

Time magazine themselves refuted his claim, it has nothing to do with me.

originally posted by: Indrasweb
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

To what end?

What does he want to achieve and how does this help him achieve it?

I’m not sure, but I suspect an entire dismantleing of the establishment in politics and media has something to do with it. His tweets are like pointing a laser on a wall, and the press and their parrots are like the cats chasing it. It exposes them for the yellow journalism they are.

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope


if your take on it is possible couldnt it also be possible he is lying?




I never said he’s not lying. I am saying it is possible that he is not.

youre right. it is possible. thats why i posted and asked as much in the OP. wanted to make sure i was reading it right.
but as asked above. which is more likely?

he is lying and it did not happen or it did and it is miscommunication at time?

It is more likely that Trump had a conversation of that sort.

Remember the lie about the NFL and the debates?

Presidential candidate Donald Trump doesn’t like the fact that two of the three scheduled debates conflict with NFL prime-time games. He claimed in an interview with ABC’s This Week that the NFL sent him a letter calling the move “ridiculous.” The league called him on it, saying no letter was sent.

Link

He has publicly lied like this before, which is one of the reasons why I find it hard to believe him here.

Your article expresses the same sentiment:

Regardless, someone provided Trump with open and obvious information about the scheduling of two debates on nights when the NFL typically plays games: Sunday and Monday. That’s a long way from an official effort to get the debates moved that was reduced to writing, printed on NFL letterhead, and signed by Roger Goodell or some other high-level league executive.

It is likely Time didn’t ask him officially. But it is probable that someone familiar with Trump kicked the idea around with him.

Then it's still a lie. Twisting the truth and altering certain parts of a story is still lying.

Kind of like you saying Time refuted his claim.

Time magazine themselves refuted his claim, it has nothing to do with me.

Someone at Time refuted the claim, just like someone at the NFL sent Trump a letter.

Trump's tweet was the code for beginning the deep state take down.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope


if your take on it is possible couldnt it also be possible he is lying?




I never said he’s not lying. I am saying it is possible that he is not.

youre right. it is possible. thats why i posted and asked as much in the OP. wanted to make sure i was reading it right.
but as asked above. which is more likely?

he is lying and it did not happen or it did and it is miscommunication at time?

It is more likely that Trump had a conversation of that sort.

Remember the lie about the NFL and the debates?

Presidential candidate Donald Trump doesn’t like the fact that two of the three scheduled debates conflict with NFL prime-time games. He claimed in an interview with ABC’s This Week that the NFL sent him a letter calling the move “ridiculous.” The league called him on it, saying no letter was sent.

Link

He has publicly lied like this before, which is one of the reasons why I find it hard to believe him here.

Your article expresses the same sentiment:

Regardless, someone provided Trump with open and obvious information about the scheduling of two debates on nights when the NFL typically plays games: Sunday and Monday. That’s a long way from an official effort to get the debates moved that was reduced to writing, printed on NFL letterhead, and signed by Roger Goodell or some other high-level league executive.

It is likely Time didn’t ask him officially. But it is probable that someone familiar with Trump kicked the idea around with him.

Then it's still a lie. Twisting the truth and altering certain parts of a story is still lying.

Kind of like you saying Time refuted his claim.

Time magazine themselves refuted his claim, it has nothing to do with me.

Someone at Time refuted the claim, just like someone at the NFL sent Trump a letter.

Any proof?

Because Time magazine says different. And no offense, but I'm sure they know more about what they did or didn't do than you do.

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope


if your take on it is possible couldnt it also be possible he is lying?




I never said he’s not lying. I am saying it is possible that he is not.

youre right. it is possible. thats why i posted and asked as much in the OP. wanted to make sure i was reading it right.
but as asked above. which is more likely?

he is lying and it did not happen or it did and it is miscommunication at time?

It is more likely that Trump had a conversation of that sort.

Remember the lie about the NFL and the debates?

Presidential candidate Donald Trump doesn’t like the fact that two of the three scheduled debates conflict with NFL prime-time games. He claimed in an interview with ABC’s This Week that the NFL sent him a letter calling the move “ridiculous.” The league called him on it, saying no letter was sent.

Link

He has publicly lied like this before, which is one of the reasons why I find it hard to believe him here.

Your article expresses the same sentiment:

Regardless, someone provided Trump with open and obvious information about the scheduling of two debates on nights when the NFL typically plays games: Sunday and Monday. That’s a long way from an official effort to get the debates moved that was reduced to writing, printed on NFL letterhead, and signed by Roger Goodell or some other high-level league executive.

It is likely Time didn’t ask him officially. But it is probable that someone familiar with Trump kicked the idea around with him.

Then it's still a lie. Twisting the truth and altering certain parts of a story is still lying.

Kind of like you saying Time refuted his claim.

Time magazine themselves refuted his claim, it has nothing to do with me.

Someone at Time refuted the claim, just like someone at the NFL sent Trump a letter.

Any proof?

Because Time magazine says different. And no offense, but I'm sure they know more about what they did or didn't do than you do.

I have no proof. You give Time the benefit of the doubt, and I’ll give Trump the benefit of the doubt.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Indrasweb
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

To what end?

What does he want to achieve and how does this help him achieve it?

I’m not sure, but I suspect an entire dismantleing of the establishment in politics and media has something to do with it. His tweets are like pointing a laser on a wall, and the press and their parrots are like the cats chasing it. It exposes them for the yellow journalism they are.

I don't think pointing out a president with obvious mental health issues and a propensity to lie about trivialities is yellow journalism.

www.mentalhealthamerica.net...

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Indrasweb
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

To what end?

What does he want to achieve and how does this help him achieve it?

I’m not sure, but I suspect an entire dismantleing of the establishment in politics and media has something to do with it. His tweets are like pointing a laser on a wall, and the press and their parrots are like the cats chasing it. It exposes them for the yellow journalism they are.

I don't think pointing out a president with obvious mental health issues and a propensity to lie about trivialities is yellow journalism.

Diagnosing someone with mental health issues without clinical technique is both unethical and lazy. Yellow journalism is unethical journalism.

This thread is a riot.

"I could care less what Trump does!"


"Did you see what Trump Tweeted? I can't believe he did that!".


Priceless

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope


if your take on it is possible couldnt it also be possible he is lying?




I never said he’s not lying. I am saying it is possible that he is not.

youre right. it is possible. thats why i posted and asked as much in the OP. wanted to make sure i was reading it right.
but as asked above. which is more likely?

he is lying and it did not happen or it did and it is miscommunication at time?

It is more likely that Trump had a conversation of that sort.

Remember the lie about the NFL and the debates?

Presidential candidate Donald Trump doesn’t like the fact that two of the three scheduled debates conflict with NFL prime-time games. He claimed in an interview with ABC’s This Week that the NFL sent him a letter calling the move “ridiculous.” The league called him on it, saying no letter was sent.

Link

He has publicly lied like this before, which is one of the reasons why I find it hard to believe him here.

Your article expresses the same sentiment:

Regardless, someone provided Trump with open and obvious information about the scheduling of two debates on nights when the NFL typically plays games: Sunday and Monday. That’s a long way from an official effort to get the debates moved that was reduced to writing, printed on NFL letterhead, and signed by Roger Goodell or some other high-level league executive.

It is likely Time didn’t ask him officially. But it is probable that someone familiar with Trump kicked the idea around with him.

Then it's still a lie. Twisting the truth and altering certain parts of a story is still lying.

Kind of like you saying Time refuted his claim.

Time magazine themselves refuted his claim, it has nothing to do with me.

Someone at Time refuted the claim, just like someone at the NFL sent Trump a letter.

Ahh, so now the goalposts are dragged over to, "well someone at Time refuted his claim.

Good to see you back in true form.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Indrasweb
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

To what end?

What does he want to achieve and how does this help him achieve it?

I’m not sure, but I suspect an entire dismantleing of the establishment in politics and media has something to do with it. His tweets are like pointing a laser on a wall, and the press and their parrots are like the cats chasing it. It exposes them for the yellow journalism they are.

I don't think pointing out a president with obvious mental health issues and a propensity to lie about trivialities is yellow journalism.

Diagnosing someone with mental health issues without clinical technique is both unethical and lazy. Yellow journalism is unethical journalism.

IMO....ignoring a president that lies, making lame excuses, is also a mental health issue, unethical and lazy as well.

www.mentalhealthamerica.net...

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope


if your take on it is possible couldnt it also be possible he is lying?




I never said he’s not lying. I am saying it is possible that he is not.

youre right. it is possible. thats why i posted and asked as much in the OP. wanted to make sure i was reading it right.
but as asked above. which is more likely?

he is lying and it did not happen or it did and it is miscommunication at time?

It is more likely that Trump had a conversation of that sort.

Remember the lie about the NFL and the debates?

Presidential candidate Donald Trump doesn’t like the fact that two of the three scheduled debates conflict with NFL prime-time games. He claimed in an interview with ABC’s This Week that the NFL sent him a letter calling the move “ridiculous.” The league called him on it, saying no letter was sent.

Link

He has publicly lied like this before, which is one of the reasons why I find it hard to believe him here.

Your article expresses the same sentiment:

Regardless, someone provided Trump with open and obvious information about the scheduling of two debates on nights when the NFL typically plays games: Sunday and Monday. That’s a long way from an official effort to get the debates moved that was reduced to writing, printed on NFL letterhead, and signed by Roger Goodell or some other high-level league executive.

It is likely Time didn’t ask him officially. But it is probable that someone familiar with Trump kicked the idea around with him.

Then it's still a lie. Twisting the truth and altering certain parts of a story is still lying.

Kind of like you saying Time refuted his claim.

Time magazine themselves refuted his claim, it has nothing to do with me.

Someone at Time refuted the claim, just like someone at the NFL sent Trump a letter.

Any proof?

Because Time magazine says different. And no offense, but I'm sure they know more about what they did or didn't do than you do.

I have no proof. You give Time the benefit of the doubt, and I’ll give Trump the benefit of the doubt.

Cool. Give Trump the benefit of the doubt. See how that works out. Or has worked out in the past.

a reply to: Indrasweb

To what end?

Attention.