It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: jimmyx
Or a devout worshipper at the alter of Murphy's law...
Has anyone ever wished for *less* ammo in a gunfight?
are you hanging around where gunfights take place?....or are you actively looking for one?
originally posted by: DAVID64
This guy has tested pretty much every ammo out there. Good honest reviews and tests.
I have 3 carry loads for my Glock 19 Gen 4. Gold Dot, Federal HST and Critical Duty.
Winchester SXZ 230 gr HP in my .45. Those things expand damn near the size of a quarter.
If I run outta those, I got 220 gr +P Critical Duty.
If deadly force is justified, it doesn't matter what tool or instrument you use to inflict that lethal force.
The law disagrees with you. You shouldn't make demonstrably false claims. In fact, lethal force is justified any time you are in danger of severe bodily harm or death.
If the attacker has the ability, opportunity and intent to cause severe bodily harm or death, then you are legally justified in using immediate deadly force to put them down.
And just FYI, explosive and incendiary ammo is not illegal. You can buy some right now, just as you can buy armor penetrating rounds. Y
The fact you equate handguns with long guns like rifles/shotguns demonstrates your lack of knowledge in this matter. If you're really that poorly informed, why even participate? It doesn't add anything to your credibility to parrot provably false anti-gun talking points.
The scenario in the OP is arming women for in home defense.