It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Liberals thoughts based on emotions not logic

page: 4
0
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 8 2005 @ 04:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Reaganwasourgreatest
Because the Bible is the only standard we, Christains use to to determine right and wrong, truth and falsehoods, love and true love, peace and real peace (no fear!).


So the supposition put forth in the thread which you've started, " Liberals thoughts based on emotions not logic", is then rendered false by the above statement.
A book of uncorrobrated didactic stories a genesis point for logic? Can't happen.




posted on Mar, 8 2005 @ 04:43 PM
link   
This will make the tenth time I have stated that may faith is illogical. Everything else I base on logic not feelings. Why do a larger percentage of women vote liberal than men. Women, in general think emotionally. Why do defense attorneys prefer women? Emotions overrule logic. Lets count the hung juries by women who said he just did not look guilty, damn the evidence.

It is logical that I please my wife, otherwise she will find someone who will. It is logical that I keep my children out of public schools; I do not want them living at home until they are 30. It is logical that if social security will need to be paid by two people for ever one person receiving that we must either raise the age, cut benefits or more likely both. It is logical that all the greedy elderly want to receive more than they paid in; most everyone wants a freebie. It is logical that politicians promise freebies to voters so they can get reelected. It is logical that politicians are corrupt; power corrupts absolutely. It is logical that if given the choice of working for low wages or parasitizing public benevolence, they choose leeching to working.
It is more logical they would vote for politicians who provide our blood.

Do not get me wrong, I love to help the poor but not at gun point. When I give it is from my heart preferably to government and their wasteful efficiencies. The I receive a reward for good deed done. Why should anyone tell me how much I need to donate. Why should I have to keep my thermostat at 50 deg F while those who refuse to work get free heating? I do not see them volunteering to pay our doctor bills.



posted on Mar, 8 2005 @ 07:24 PM
link   
I agree. If the core of this country would give to the private sector like they are now forced to, the standard of living in this country would go way up.

But that can't happen is they are taxed as much as they are.

I disagree that liberals thoughts are not based on logic, it's that they make themselves out to be the loving giving caring party. It's not so, because the difference is in ideology alone. Other facts lend themselves to that end, but the ideology is the end result on either side.

It is the hate between them that stagnates progress to a better America than the one we have now (let's face it, is really good for neither side).

I don't understand why either party can't seem to do anything about it.



posted on Mar, 9 2005 @ 08:26 AM
link   
Regansucked: keep going for the 11th, 12th ad infinium time in trying to explain illogic as logic; you stated the sole point for right & wrong, true or false deliniation within your life is the bible, a book of fairy tales. Your logic is predicated on illogic, and moreover, fundamentally so, by your devout definition.

Jethro: both parties are comprimised. True, there are agent provocateurs who stick by their guns & don't know the ropes, but they are allowed by the power elites in both parties....they give the appeareance that there isn't collusion.
2004 proved that both the Dems & Repubs are working together to screw America....the fix is in.



posted on Mar, 9 2005 @ 05:57 PM
link   
Bout time, are you really that angry? By what you have written you sound mid twenties, white, parents bourgeois or more likely wealthy (therefore your guilt), wannabe or wankster, who listens to crp like green day. I detect nothing but emotions therefore your surperflous diatribe, reflecting your narcissistic worldly view.

If you want to rant please take lessons from Rant, who I at least admire though earnestly disagree with.

Peace Bro



posted on Mar, 9 2005 @ 06:03 PM
link   
Emotions have logic, logic does not have emotions.



posted on Mar, 9 2005 @ 11:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
Emotions have logic, logic does not have emotions.


SPOCK@


SPOCK!



SPOCK!



Oh wait, he was half human, nevermind.



posted on Mar, 10 2005 @ 07:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Reaganwasourgreatest
Bout time, are you really that angry? By what you have written you sound mid twenties, white, parents bourgeois or more likely wealthy (therefore your guilt), wannabe or wankster, who listens to crp like green day. I detect nothing but emotions therefore your surperflous diatribe, reflecting your narcissistic worldly view.

If you want to rant please take lessons from Rant, who I at least admire though earnestly disagree with.

Peace Bro


Regansucked: Since the bible apparently colors your powers of perception as well, might I suggest the following to help counter that:

- click on the "Find Posts" button - you'll learn about both those you admire & those who discredit your thesises. (hint: I voted for Reagan, were you old enough? )

In my case, you'll be suprised just how off you are.

The positioning of me being "angry" for the set up purpose of the "Liberals are filled with hate" canard is too obvious, try again.
If you follow the more cogent conservatives posting styles, you'd save this back & forth.
But to really offer up a thread titled as such, where you then regurgitate false intellectualism from the Freeper board, is to invite the holes being shot in your argument, no matter how many talking points ("love to help the poor but not at gunpoint"......that's pretty funny how many times that comes up on a search!
) you try to incorporate.
If you can reconcile the aforementioned 'bible as my navigator' logic disconnect, maybe you'd invite less dissection. Until then, try not to make it so obvious that you were not built for climbing the tree of knowledge & understand .......you're in Slug-Fest!!!!



posted on Mar, 10 2005 @ 10:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by edsinger
SPOCK@


SPOCK!



SPOCK!



Oh wait, he was half human, nevermind.

***Puts on nerd galsses**
"eeemm weell I think you'll find Comander Spock was dedicated to logic emmm and so wasnt logical , he just followed the ummmm logical eeehh course of action neh neh. ***Takes of nerd glasses***
I dont watch star treck , honest!



posted on Mar, 12 2005 @ 05:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
***Puts on nerd galsses**


You calling me a Nerd? Just becasue I watch Star Trek?


Oh well Nerd I am then...



posted on Mar, 12 2005 @ 07:23 PM
link   
You could be a a stupid jock, who no doubt some of these Neanderthals think like.



posted on Mar, 12 2005 @ 09:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Reaganwasourgreatest
You could be a a stupid jock, who no doubt some of these Neanderthals think like.


You have a point, I mean they are enlightened aren't they? Must have the good green haired stuff, you know the sticky kind.



posted on Mar, 13 2005 @ 11:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by edsinger
You calling me a Nerd? Just becasue I watch Star Trek?


Oh well Nerd I am then...


No simply trying to nerd you out....i watch it too...



posted on Mar, 13 2005 @ 06:47 PM
link   
Then we both are nerds!



posted on Mar, 14 2005 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by edsinger
Then we both are nerds!

"shhh!"
**knocks out ed with limited edition only working phaser stolen from the "simpsons" episode; "the collector" and hides him in closet while pulling out USP and sneaks away**

I dont own the simpsons, the USP, the "phasor" or any other afore mention items...dont sue me!



posted on Mar, 14 2005 @ 08:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp

Originally posted by edsinger
Then we both are nerds!

"shhh!"
**knocks out ed with limited edition only working phaser stolen from the "simpsons" episode; "the collector" and hides him in closet while pulling out USP and sneaks away**

I dont own the simpsons, the USP, the "phasor" or any other afore mention items...dont sue me!


Don't you know that is a felony in the UK to own a phaser? That is only meant for criminals to have access to.




posted on Mar, 15 2005 @ 06:32 PM
link   
I own a phaser, here let me teleport to my bat cave, time transport back in time before you asked the question and zap you with it.


Of course you did not get a chance to read this


[edit on 15-3-2005 by Reaganwasourgreatest]



posted on Mar, 16 2005 @ 09:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by edsinger
Don't you know that is a felony in the UK to own a phaser? That is only meant for criminals to have access to.


Actually no, we have some crazy laws over here.
www.met.police.uk...

Heres the homepage....a link to SO19 (British version of SWAT) is on there too.
www.met.police.uk...



posted on Mar, 16 2005 @ 10:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by edsinger
[
You calling me a Nerd? Just becasue I watch Star Trek?


Oh well Nerd I am then...


Uhh ed you are aware that the United federation of Planets is socialist aren't you?
As least by the time of The next generation it was, Back n kirks day they still had a capitalist society but by picards they were pure socialists, no one could own property.

Stick to star wars my friend, Both the Empire and new republic were solidly capitalist.



posted on Apr, 14 2005 @ 08:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp

Actually no, we have some crazy laws over here.


So you can purchase a personal firearm for protection then?



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join