It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: havok
Whatcha got?
Oh this again.
Let me know when they bring charges will ya?
Circle jerk activated.
originally posted by: RickinVa
Bill Clinton gave a 20 minute speech for which he was paid $500,000.00
That's $416.00 a minute.
Must have been some very powerful words.
Yes, and we know guistra was advocating for things that were in the interest of the Russian government.
And remember, people thought there would be a great chance Hillary would be the next President in 2005.
Now tell me why we need investigations into trump or associated financial ties going back to 2006 (in the case of the manafort indictment) well before anyone had a remote idea trump would even run for president, but Hillary getting around 100 million from a person advocating jrussian interests doesn't matter because it was before sh3 was SOS?
Further more, even with guistra money out of the mix, the Clintons still received millions from people pushing the u1 deal while she was SOS, including a personal 500 thousand dollars to Bill from a Russian bank.
So is the official word from democrats here that millions from Russian interests to the Clintons is no big deal, but a half a million in Facebook adds was a huge deal that shows russia is evil and helped trump steal the election?
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: iTruthSeeker
The article says that Campbell has proof that russia was pushing to help democrats overcome republican opposition to the deal, and was bribing someone close to the Clintons to get them on board to pass the deal.
Hopefully, Campbell's testimony will shine light on this.
And to think how many even on ats here railed against anyone who had questions about this deal as nuts, and fought against having an investigation.
But for the partisan Hillary supporters only trump connections to russia are serious, so nothing to see here.
Campbell’s debriefing files also show he regularly mentioned to FBI agents in 2010 a Washington entity with close ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton that was being paid millions to help expand Tenex’s business in the United States. The entity began increasing its financial support to a Clinton charitable project after it was hired by the Russians, according to the documents.
Campbell engaged in conversations with his Russian colleagues about the efforts of the Washington entity and others to gain influence with the Clintons and the Obama administration. He also listened as visiting Russians used racially tinged insults to boast about how easy they found it to win uranium business under Obama, according to a source familiar with Campbell’s planned testimony to Congress.
Yes, and we know guistra was advocating for things that were in the interest of the Russian government.
originally posted by: havok
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: havok
Whatcha got?
Oh this again.
Let me know when they bring charges will ya?
And here she comes for the takedown!
Good to see you grace our presence with your ever-lasting comments!
It was only a matter of time.
Beginning to think you 3 are seriously getting paid to deflect/deny/defend.
The threads are always better when you chime in.
originally posted by: RickinVa
Bill Clinton gave a 20 minute speech for which he was paid $500,000.00
That's $416.00 a minute.
Must have been some very powerful words.
(CNN)Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, combined to earn more than $153 million in paid speeches from 2001 until Hillary Clinton launched her presidential campaign last spring, a CNN analysis shows.
In total, the two gave 729 speeches from February 2001 until May, receiving an average payday of $210,795 for each address. The two also reported at least $7.7 million for at least 39 speeches to big banks, including Goldman Sachs and UBS, with Hillary Clinton, the Democratic 2016 front-runner, collecting at least $1.8 million for at least eight speeches to big banks.
In 2014, before Clinton Cash was in the public eye, the Washington Post analyzed Clinton’s speaking fees and found he made at least $104 million in speaking fees between 2001 through 2012 -- more than half of that income came from speeches in foreign countries (though he gave more speeches within the United States).
2003 -- Japan, $500,000 Sakura Asset Management (Japanese finance corporation) (A note: This speech was canceled, but the fee went to Clinton’s presidential library foundation);
2008 -- California, $500,000, Power Within (life coach Anthony Robbins’ brand);
2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);
2010 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Novo Nordisk (Danish pharmaceutical company);
2011 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
2011 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation (Austrian nongovernmental organization);
2011 -- Netherlands, $600,000, Achmea (Dutch finance corporation);
2011 -- China, $550,000, Huatuo CEO Forum (business conference);
2011 -- United Arab Emirates, $500,000, Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (international environmental information organization);
2011 -- Hong Kong, $750,000, Ericsson (Swedish multinational communications technology company);
2012 -- Nigeria, $700,000, THISDAY (newspaper);
2012 -- Austria, $500,000, Center for Global Dialogue and Cooperation (Austrian nongovernmental organization);
2012 -- Italy, $500,000, Technogym (fitness equipment manufacturer).
Former keynote speakers and guests are globally renown and include the former US President Bill Clinton, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and the former US Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger, Madeleine Albright, and Colin Powell.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: dukeofjive696969
And when it really gets rough, they have to activate the best weapon that they have in their arsenal of CTR phrases.
Circle jerk activated.