It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Russia Scandal Just Got Much Worse … For Hillary Clinton And Barack Obama

page: 3
77
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: iTruthSeeker

Jeff Sessions just said this was nonesense but y’all just dive right in , huh???

I really wonder what it’s like to be so propaganzied, that I just believe whatever the PTB say, no matter how cray it is or how often the change the story..


What you believe is exactly what Sessions wants you to believe.



Stay safe in that comfort zone !!





posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:06 AM
link   
There must be something huge coming out if yahoo is running this story, they are trying to look balanced all of a sudden!



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: iTruthSeeker

Jeff Sessions just said this was nonesense but y’all just dive right in , huh???

I really wonder what it’s like to be so propaganzied, that I just believe whatever the PTB say, no matter how cray it is or how often the change the story..


What you believe is exactly what Sessions wants you to believe.



Stay safe in that comfort zone !!





Tick Tock



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: iTruthSeeker

I would love to see the guilty punished.

But my hopes are tempered by the revelations of slush funds for sex abuse in congress.

It's not partisan, they all suck, they all are corrupt, they won't eat their own.

We'll see a token "firing" maybe a stern finger wag or a tough worded statement.

But I don't hold out for hopes for justice, honesty or integrity any more.


Bribes are bribes though and this tactic hasnt been clearly exposed previously.

If it is clearly exposed regarding HRC and Obama, then there is no where to run = there is no choice but bipartisan cannibalism.

We have been dealing with "intent" and semantics for some time, but we are turning the corner on that nowadays with new and upcoming revelations.

Remember, as much as we sheep know, there is 10 times that amount that hasnt been exposed yet that we can only speculate on. It only takes a couple people to blow up the dam. Campbell will be key either way.

Which means we have to ask the question...who has access to Campbell? Will he get bribed? Or worse?
edit on 5421x6754America/ChicagovAmerica/Chicago11 by six67seven because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: elementalgrove

Your right lol...


More comes out about the ACTUAL INVESTGATION INTO Trumps Russian collisions almost everyday, with indictments already getting handed out.....


Yet Jeff Sessions just admitted to congress he had no evidence against Hilary so he would not be moving forward..


Of course, the fox guarding the hen house would say nothing to see here, move along!



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:26 AM
link   
About time for some more Clinton/Obama doom porn! Is it tick tock again? Or did everyone give up on that the first 5 times it fizzled out?

Asking for a Clinton.... who I'm sure is real worried.




posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Hillary Clintons Foundation received 140 million from the Russians.

That's not in dispute.

And no one bats a friggin' eye.

THAT'S the big conspiracy, in my opinion.


That's entirely false but it perfectly demonstrates the level of disinformation swirling around the Uranium One "scandal" on the Right.

I'm going to go ahead and correct you with sources in the hopes that you'll stop repeating this.

The majority of the figure you're citing came from Frank Giustra who founded UrAsia Energy.

* The first $31.3 million was donated by Giustra's own charity months after the 2005 trip to Kazakhstan.

* In April of 2007, South African company Uranium One acquired UrAsia Energy. At this point, Frank Giustra sold his stake which was worth about $45 million.

* In March of 2008, Frank Giustra organized a "star-studded" charity gala for the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative at the Harbour Castle Westin in Toronto. That event took in about $16 million in pledges from various celebs. Giustra himself pledged $100 million from his own charity to fund the initiative.

* In June of 2009, Rosatom acquired a 17% stake in Uranium One.

* In December of 2009, Uranium One and Cogema Mining announced the acquisition of Cogema by Uranium one, a sale completed in January of 2010. Cogema mining owned the mineral rights to the land comprising the Willow Creek Project (two sites aka Irigaray and Christensen Ranch) in Wyoming (land is half privately owned and half owned by the federal government and managed by BLM).

* On June 8th 2010, Rosatom announced its intent to expand its stake in Uranium One to 51% which is what required CFIUS approval (because of Willow Creek).

So no, the Russians didn't give the Clinton Foundation $140 million. Most of that money came from Frank Giustra of UrAsia Energy, a chunk of it when he was still operating UrAsia Energy and another chunk after the sale of UrAsia to Uranium One which occurred years before Rosatom ("the Russians") had entered the picture.
edit on 2017-11-22 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)


+15 more 
posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Yes, and we know guistra was advocating for things that were in the interest of the Russian government.

And remember, people thought there would be a great chance Hillary would be the next President in 2005.

Now tell me why we need investigations into trump or associated financial ties going back to 2006 (in the case of the manafort indictment) well before anyone had a remote idea trump would even run for president, but Hillary getting around 100 million from a person advocating jrussian interests doesn't matter because it was before sh3 was SOS?

Further more, even with guistra money out of the mix, the Clintons still received millions from people pushing the u1 deal while she was SOS, including a personal 500 thousand dollars to Bill from a Russian bank.

So is the official word from democrats here that millions from Russian interests to the Clintons is no big deal, but a half a million in Facebook adds was a huge deal that shows russia is evil and helped trump steal the election?

What a joke.
edit on 22-11-2017 by Grambler because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:37 AM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Just keep holding your breath lol...

When will I be able to point and laugh WHEN it never happens??

Obviously you will be able to if it does.

So when will it be obvious to you it will not?? .


Do you ever get tired of being wrong??

IRS scandal, Benghazi, pizzagate, ac0rn , obama birth certificate??
edit on 22-11-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:41 AM
link   
DRAMA, DRAMA, here comes another :

But, but, but, but Hillary and Obama....



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: theantediluvian

What a joke.


My thoughts every time I see one of the hundred threads based on assumptions and half truths that try to deflect away from the very real problems the Trump admin is experiencing right now.

But hey, we all have to find humor where we can.




posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:55 AM
link   
Uranium one again.


Yawn.

You guys aren't over this fantasy yet?



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: elementalgrove

Nope. It's nothing...never was anything but a wingnut pipe dream.



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: theantediluvian

What a joke.


My thoughts every time I see one of the hundred threads based on assumptions and half truths that try to deflect away from the very real problems the Trump admin is experiencing right now.

But hey, we all have to find humor where we can.


Obviously you haven't noticed, but Democrats and the MSM are falling over themselves trying to throw Hillary (and now Bill) under the bus. They can see what's coming quite clearly.



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 12:01 PM
link   
a reply to: havok

Whatcha got?

Oh this again.

Let me know when they bring charges will ya?



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 12:03 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

I missed that. Where is this info. I haven't seen it.



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 12:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: theantediluvian

What a joke.


My thoughts every time I see one of the hundred threads based on assumptions and half truths that try to deflect away from the very real problems the Trump admin is experiencing right now.

But hey, we all have to find humor where we can.


Obviously you haven't noticed, but Democrats and the MSM are falling over themselves trying to throw Hillary (and now Bill) under the bus. They can see what's coming quite clearly.

And they will as soon as it's politically expedient.

When and if it does happen, it won't be because of fabricated claims made up by Trump cronies desperate to take the eyes off of the massive ship sinking in front of everybody...

To all of you Hillary haters: Running with every questionable story and arguing non-stop that it's fact simply because it paints Hillary or Obama in a bad light only makes it that much harder for Hillary or Obama to ever be brought to justice, if in fact they did something wrong.

But hey, what's trending on zerohedge today? I think I'll look over here...



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 12:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Last week, He was being badgered by a GOP congressman demanding a time table on when a special prosecutor might be formed..

After trying to give an obscure affirmative sounding answer, the gop congressman kept pushing for a definitive answer...

So Sessions fed up finally saying,

“Right now I don’t have the evidence to.. whenever I am given the evidence, I will..”


edit on 22-11-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

The N.Y. Times did not do a story verifying uranium one.
It's a non starter.
edit on 11222017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 12:54 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Is that you Spicey Spicer.



new topics

top topics



 
77
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join