It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Hugh Hefner and the Sexual Revolution are Dead!"

page: 1
8
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:04 PM
link   
If you are say over 60 you can still remember when Hefner and Playboy Magazine took us out of the remains of

the Victorian era of prudishness and sexual hypocrisy.

Soon after we were in the era of anything goes - The pornography still being shown reflects this.

But while this was going on the Female Liberation movement advanced along another path
- Where anything having to do with women and sex, especially where money and/or business was involved,
said women were being exploited - Of course sometimes this was and is true.

But with this current rash of accusations against men of power by women - for reasons of what might be called 'risque'
behaviour - but not threatening behaviour, not rape - just sexual, and maybe not even serious, behaviourism
we can see Queen Victoria and the Victorian era returning [the Victorian era from the late 1800s into the early 20th Centiurhy was noted for prudish sexual morals but paradoxically produced some excellent erotica, all of course underground]

is this really happening? Are we going back to the hypocritical past? - Should women stop being sexy and men act like eunuchs?

What do you think


edit on 21-11-2017 by AlienView because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:17 PM
link   
a reply to: AlienView

No. nothing has changed. This is me as a 36 year old working for a supervisor I first worked with when I was 16.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: AlienView

I don't think cat pictures and videos are going to take over the Internet anytime soon.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:35 PM
link   
Yeah, the new sexual revolution is woman saying how rich and prestigious people sexually assaulted them. How boring, I liked the seventies. I remember when women would stick out there thumb and us guys would pick them up and go party with them. I actually got a ticket for picking up six hitchhiking girls one day. I went to my fraternity party with all of them and showed off my thirty dollar ticket to my fraternity brothers. I left with all six of them about five hours later in my customized van. I was too buzzed up to go out with any of them, I dropped them off at their dorm where they were staying and crashed down by the lake in the bedroom of my van alone.


That's life, great memory though. It was enjoyable listening to the girls discuss who was going to go out with me though, but I passed on that one. I guess I shouldn't have been driving in the shape I was in. The cop didn't want to give me the ticket but the cop from across the bridge in Hancock pulled me over. The Houghton cop said he would have picked them up himself if he would have saw them. The experience was well worth the thirty bucks back in the mid seventies.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:41 PM
link   
fresh bread from the conspiracy oven.

Wouldja believe it?
Or fathom the implications



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:47 PM
link   
nope is what i think. young women/feminists today are quite liberated and in touch with their sexuality. they're also looking to be the ones in charge of it. nice moral panic though (anti-moral panic?)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 12:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: AlienView
for reasons of what might be called 'risque'
behaviour - but not threatening behaviour, not rape - just sexual, and maybe not even serious, behaviourism
we can see Queen Victoria and the Victorian era returning

The hell? Is this post serious? Not only are we talking about rape but often underage rape. Seriously, if someone powerful came up to you and said bend over or I will ruin your career and get away with it, would you still think it's not serious? Because that is literally what's happening. Who even asked men to act like "eunuchs"? This whole fiasco is about consent, not sexual behaviour itself



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 12:27 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienView

I don’t know if men should act like eunuchs, but the time is ripe for the gentleman to make his return.



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 02:33 AM
link   
Women have been bending over for wealth since the beginning of time. It’s not going to stop anytime soon.

The sexual movement didn’t even start with Hugh. It started back after WW1 and the prohibition era when women were ditching dresses for more revealing attire.



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 02:59 AM
link   
And now a recent list of the men to date accused of sexual misconduct - Notice there are no women on the list.

Should we conclude that the women are all angels and had nothing to do with the rowdy males so accused ?

Here goes:

After Weinstein: The Fallout for 34 Men Accused of Sexual Misconduct, From Lewd Texts to Rape

"At the beginning of October, multiple women came forward to accuse Harvey Weinstein, the Hollywood producer, of sexual misconduct. Since then, high-profile men in a variety of industries have resigned, been fired or experienced other fallout after accusations that have ranged from inappropriate text messages to rape. Here is a list of such cases, which we will update periodically. The list does not include accusations against men for whom there has been no or minimal fallout.

See quote source and complete list of the men accused to date here:
www.nytimes.com...


So men you are safe - Apparentlhy no women will atem;pt to seduce and then cry rape ?!?!



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 03:31 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienView

It would have been a great band name.

Ladies and gentlemen, please give it up for "Hugh Hefner and the Sexual Revolution".



Sadly though, there was no magical liberation. Humans have always had sex, even the prudish ones.

edit on 22/11/2017 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 04:58 AM
link   
I think it's time to balance these warped scales and bring to light the misandry, sexual harassment, and yes -- rape -- that women do to men. When a woman claims something, whoa nelly, OMG, stop the freakin' presses & gather the reporters! Everyone with a third leg should DIAF, you're all pigs, why can't you be gentlemen, yada yada.

Men should be afforded the same right to speak out without being drowned out by women. Men should be able to speak out without being ignored or the butt of jokes. Women should do their part in making sure ALL victims are treated equally, they are not the sole victims of sex crimes. Just because they may have some majority in them does not nullify male victims, either. Yet, we never hear about them much, they're drowned out in a deafening roar of feminist BS. In the game of Accusation Nation, what's good for the goose is good for the gander & vice versa. Step up & support your fellow humans, girls. Unless it doesn't serve you well.

So to hell with the sexual revolution stuff, there's bigger fish to fry before it's too out of hand. Gear up in the flameproof suits and step forth. You're not lesser than women and women are not so fragile as to not share the victim spotlight. If someone's been abused, assaulted, groped, gender doesn't matter, right?
Unless they support such a one-sided view, in which case, we have bigger social underbelly inequality issues to conquer.
edit on 11/22/2017 by Nyiah because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 04:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: AlienView

It would have been a great band name.

Ladies and gentlemen, please give it up for "Hugh Hefner and the Sexual Revolution"...............



And the band played well for years - Hefner got to live out his fantasy world, gave some of it to us, and lived to the ripe old age of 90.

But my brain still hasn't gotten used to culture schock, never even gotten used to turning 30 let alone old age.

But here I am watching something that I honestly don't know how to process - Charlie Rose accused of walking into a room nude with a female in the room - We always assumed Chalie Rose's business suit was his outer skin!

Seriously though there is something fishy about this sudden expose of every inappropeiate act - like some new dark
age of the the 'Anti-Sex League' from "1984" is about to descend on the masses.

"It’s as if George Orwell’s Junior Anti-sex League has occupied feminism."

"Sadly, nothing has changed in recent years. In the early 1990s, I - along with several other feminist scholars (Wendy Kaminer, Daphne Patai, Camille Paglia, Mary Lefkowitz, Katie Roiphe, to name only a few) - went to battle against hard-line, sex-panicked conspiracy feminists like Andrea Dworkin. My side won the arguments, but their side quietly assumed all of the assistant professorships. So colleges are now full of gender scholars who instruct students on the ravages of the capitalist, heterero-patriachal system and its 'rape culture'. Everywhere we hear about 'micro-aggressions', 'trigger-warnings', and the toxicity of masculinity. It’s as if George Orwell’s Junior Anti-sex League has occupied feminism."
BY HELEN SMITH APRIL 13, 2015

Quote source:
pjmedia.com...
edit on 22-11-2017 by AlienView because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 05:22 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienView

Hugh Hefner was a CIA MKUltra sex slave handler and pimp.

Playboy magazine was founded shortly after the CIA was. Taping powerful businessmen, actors, politicians, etc. having sex with prostitutes (some of them underage) was the ultimate blackmail materiel. The CIA would then get these tapes. That person would then be at the behest of the Deep State for life.

I once watched an episode of Americas Hidden secrets where they were inside the Playboy mansion. There were underground tunnels, hidden rooms, secret passageways everywhere. I remember thinking, why the hell does Heff need all this secrecy to move around his own house? Makes perfect sense when looked at in that context.

Look into the suicide of playmate of the year Paige Young if you're curious about this topic.



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 05:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
a reply to: AlienView

Hugh Hefner was a CIA MKUltra sex slave handler and pimp.

Playboy magazine was founded shortly after the CIA was. Taping powerful businessmen, actors, politicians, etc. having sex with prostitutes (some of them underage) was the ultimate blackmail materiel. The CIA would then get these tapes. That person would then be at the behest of the Deep State for life............


Seriously


If you want us to believe that - Then believe that I started this post because I'm a warlock planning to hold a
witches sabbat out in the woods and that since the sabbat is always held in the nude, I was just testing the water
to make sure no one accused me of sexual harassement during the Sabbat ceremonies



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 06:00 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienView




If you want us to believe that - Then believe that I started this post because I'm a warlock


You can believe it or not. Does'nt affect my life either way.

The evidence is there for anyone willing to look. You obviously have an internet connection.

Do you really think some of the worlds most powerful and influential people were invited to the Playboy mansion to sit by the pool and look at the pretty girls then you haven't been paying attention to how the establishment operates.
edit on 22-11-2017 by Cancerwarrior because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 07:08 AM
link   
It doesn't seem like a new revolution to me. "No" still means "no.

Nothing is more exciting and rewarding than when a woman freely gives herself to you out of desire.

The problem is most desirable women today are not interest unless you are multi-billionaire juiced-up stud with better looks than Fabio.

And so, the battle of the sexes continues. Something must be working somewhere because there's 7.4 billion people on the planet. I see pregnant women everywhere. People love to copulate!



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 08:50 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienView

Old men have been out of touch with reality since the first old man. I say this as an aging male. For the youth, the sexual revolution is just no longer a revolution lol.



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 09:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: fiverx313
nope is what i think. young women/feminists today are quite liberated and in touch with their sexuality. they're also looking to be the ones in charge of it. nice moral panic though (anti-moral panic?)


If by "liberated" you mean willing to go out get tipsy enough to do something she regrets in the morning and then decide because she regrets it, she was raped.



posted on Nov, 22 2017 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: fiverx313
nope is what i think. young women/feminists today are quite liberated and in touch with their sexuality. they're also looking to be the ones in charge of it. nice moral panic though (anti-moral panic?)


If by "liberated" you mean willing to go out get tipsy enough to do something she regrets in the morning and then decide because she regrets it, she was raped.


I have seen a few girls do that during my life. That wasn't common, and the cops knew some women did it all the time. You would see her in the bar or party all over a guy and you hear the next week that she had said she was raped. The guy denies he forced her and from what you observed you wonder who raped who. Some women can't handle their liqueur well, you learn to stay away from girls like that quickly. Nothing usually comes of it, no charges or anything, but if even a few people believe her than the guy may get inappropriately slandered. Like you said, when they find out what they did when drunk the night before, they start to blame it on the guy.

There are legitimate rapes, there are guys that force themselves on girls even though they said no. That kind of behavior is wrong, if she says no then you have to make out longer and ask again. If she still says no, then it is time to go home and take a cold shower or go back to the bar. If you stay, you just wind up making a pest of yourself and she never wants to see you again.
edit on 22-11-2017 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
8
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join