It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Most Dangerous President

page: 6
81
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: paraphi
Wasn't Kennedy pretty dangerous. Bay of Pigs. Brink of WW3 with the Cuban Missile Crisis. Vietnam. Plus the womanising. Makes Trump seem tame IMHO.


So dangerous they killed him.




posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid

Trump puts a target on something, say the NFL, BOYCOTT. Mila Kunis says something about Trump BOYCOTT Jack Daniels because she's their spokesperson.


Well first it is not Jack Daniels.... It is Jim Beam...I guess this wasn't too important for you to even get the name right...


Second it wasn't Trump but Pence...lol strike two


she makes monthly donations to Planned Parenthood in Vice President Mike Pence’s name.


Where does Trump fit in all this....


Wait another year and we'll see. Once even disagreeing with the president can harm you either financially or physically you may as well just call him Caesar.


I think we see more people getting triggered if they see someone agree with Trump...What Antifa type movement is attacking those on the left?



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Consider the context of the boycotts.

Boycotting the NFl was never about what they did or said about Trump. It was about the flag and the anthem.

The Mila Kunis thing is that she made donations to planned parenthood using the Vice-Presidents name. And its a boycott of Jim Beam. At least get the facts right.

And who actually condoned assault?


"Talking a Knee" was never about Trump. But the narcissist - in - chief had to make it about him.

It was a protest - a non-violent - protest about police violence.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: FyreByrd

The flag has nothing to do with police.

Even before Trump, many saw it as a protest of the entire country via the flag.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: IAMNOTYOU

The thing is that it isn't half the population. Many conservatives don't support him. The ones that do are much more active in their politics than others. To many it seems as devoted as any religion.

You are overselling and underselling the effect Trump has had, if that's possible. The White Blue Collar flight from the Democratic Party wasn't Trump's fault, blame the DNC. Trump had a message where the Democrats obviously didn't.

The status quo doesn't like him. Even though he is a Billionaire ect, he is relatable to a lot of people , but not to DC. Even though he does petty things, I still get a chuckle out of how much he offends some people. The problem Trump has is the Republican party isn't full of his candidates, he is fighting two parties to get things accomplished. That goes back to he status quo not liking him.

He's not perfect, but he sure was better than everyone on the Republican side save Rand and was infinitely better than Mrs. Bill Clinton. All they had to do was run Bernie and we'd be talking much differently.

Now someone will lay into me for saying that Bernie would have been the better choice over Clinton.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: FyreByrd

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Consider the context of the boycotts.

Boycotting the NFl was never about what they did or said about Trump. It was about the flag and the anthem.

The Mila Kunis thing is that she made donations to planned parenthood using the Vice-Presidents name. And its a boycott of Jim Beam. At least get the facts right.

And who actually condoned assault?


"Talking a Knee" was never about Trump. But the narcissist - in - chief had to make it about him.

It was a protest - a non-violent - protest about police violence.


That was never communicated to the public.

The Public missed that. The Players made it about themselves.

The protest doesn't belong in the NFL...

Not saying there isn't something to protest.

A bunch of rich men playing a kids game were horrible spokesmen.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: angeldoll

originally posted by: Jefferton

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: intrepid

This Thread has been reported to ats as non-compliant with the rules you agreed to when you joined the Forum.

Good job skippy!



Careful! I had a post removed yesterday for calling someone 'skippy'.

(or maybe it's just because it's me, lol.)


No, its John Podesta.



No Skippy is Podesta's evil persona that gets a thrill from terrorizing small children.

"YA THINK YOU'RE HOT #, DON'TCHA?!" "I'M YOUR FATHA!" (kid was probably an orphan).



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:37 PM
link   
a reply to: whyamIhere

That isn't entirely true either.

They could be very powerful forces, but they went about it the wrong way. They made it an empty gesture and one not really connected to what they say they are protesting or wanting to help with.

If they really wanted to make a difference ... there are kids who need fathers, need to be taught how to avoid getting into trouble - things every one of those players managed to do, and it wasn't just sports alone that enabled it. I guarantee you there are athletically talented kids who waste themselves in the hood because they can't master the other skills they will need to get out, the skills every one of those athletes had to at least minimally master.

So they could make an impact in that way. Teach those life skills to the kids who so badly need it. Kids who look up to them.

But what am I thinking? That takes time and investment.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: FyreByrd




"Talking a Knee" was never about Trump. But the narcissist - in - chief had to make it about him.

It was a protest - a non-violent - protest about police violence.


It was posturing and political grandstanding sold under the banner of "peaceful protest". He's regurgitating the doctrines of his Marxist advisor for show and status.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: intrepid

I don't know. What was the solution for people who undermined others for going against Obama?

Answer that and you'll know.


To paraphrase the Rev. Jerimiah Wright, In 2016, Those chickens came home to roost.

Both parties must fall in order for all of us to work together again on things. Neither Party cares for the Average American. Trump is just the start of their collapse hopefully.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 05:58 PM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

I'm a independent voter and I see the left as militant and closed minded so sway me to think otherwise



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 06:10 PM
link   
What shrimpy like first paragraph.

Trump is moving big-time....I guess it's possible he's about to get rid of the bad guys



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 06:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: intrepid

The irony here is that much of what you're talking about was first attempted by the Anti-Trump movement. Doxxing and shaming Trump supporters, boycotting stores that sold his daughter's product lines, boycotting his resorts, firing people for supporting Trump, blacklisting celebs who were Trump supporters... Newton's Third Law, my man... for every action, there is an equal and opposite REaction. Welcome to the reaction.

Exactly... the OP complains about not being able to criticize Trump without being attacked, without considering for a moment how the exact same thing happens to Trump supporters, and how it occurs on a more personal level. It's hip and cool to be against Trump, all the celebs and talk show hosts continually rag on him, and supporting him in any way is met by pure disgust and belittlement by these people. Your political views will instantly make you shunned by these people who are supposedly really tolerant and open minded. Corporations don't have personal feelings, they will get over a boycott. People who are shunned by their friends and family will have a much harder time getting over it.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 06:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Jefferton
I get the feeling that his followers are much more dangerous than Trump will ever be.

They are very much like religious extremists in their mentality. Any crime againt their enemies is "justified".


Yeah but he can target something and BOOM.


This is so true. I remember when Trump targeted Hillary Clinton and she went BOOM.


Trump is very good at targeting democrats and making them go boom.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 07:01 PM
link   
Dangerous eh?

Hillary was the only viable alternative by design.

Hillary Clinton!

You should be thankful not knowing how dangerous a president can REALLY be.





posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 07:03 PM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

Last I checked it was the bleeding heart liberals/socialists/communists doing the mass violence in the streets. Not to mention everything you claimed was done by the left in general. From shaming Trump supporters, to downright attacking Trump supporters... From making claims "You are a Trump supporter? YOU ARE A RACIST, "insert label"... Don't play innocent now...It just shows dishonesty on your part.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 07:05 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Here's the body count and "unit" identifier




posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 07:31 PM
link   
Not to sure, but I always believed that standing behind your President a part of being patriotic. Wasn't president Regan the "I can't recall." President, and almost every American was ok with that. Didn't Col. North admit to doing illegal activity associated with it (at the behest of the President and Vice President). reply to: intrepid



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 07:36 PM
link   
Poll: Trump 'could shoot someone' and keep his support


The question:

"If Donald Trump shot someone on 5th Avenue, would you approve or disapprove of the job he's doing as president?"

45 percent approve.
29 percent disapprove.
26 percent aren't sure.


Trump can do no wrong in these people's eyes.

‘Still the best candidate’: Some evangelicals still back Trump despite lewd video


The newest poll from the Public Religion Research Institute said that 69 percent of white evangelical Protestants favored Trump while 19 percent supported Clinton. The latest Washington Post/ABC poll indicates that 52 percent of evangelicals of any race favored Trump compared to 40 percent who supported Clinton.


This was shortly after the 'grab 'em by the pu**y' video.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 07:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: paraphi
Wasn't Kennedy pretty dangerous. Bay of Pigs. Brink of WW3 with the Cuban Missile Crisis. Vietnam. Plus the womanising. Makes Trump seem tame IMHO.
And then there's the clintons...The philanderer in chief traded top secret plans for our nuclear capabilities to China for campaign donations...Then his low life wife passed out national security secrets on her unsecured private email...And THEN she sold 20% of our uranium to Iran thru Russia, while they both raked in millions upon millions of dollars for payment...And that's all future American uranium as well...

I don't know if these snowflakes are flat out stupid or just plain dishonest...



new topics

top topics



 
81
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join