It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump names North Korea a state sponsor of terrorism

page: 2
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 07:35 AM
link   
a reply to: AngelicIRage

I thought Bush had already named North Korea as a sponsor of terror back in his "axis of evil" speech before going into Iraq.

If I remember right, or close to right, it was Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. Or maybe the list was changed since to exclude N.K.
edit on 21-11-2017 by tinymind because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 08:11 AM
link   
a reply to: AngelicIRage

i guess it's almost time to go 'free' NK..



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 08:43 AM
link   
I fully support this action on the Part of President Trump and the Global Governers. The truth about the good people of NK have yet to have light shed upon the terror that they have lived and died under by these generational Terrorist regimes.

No one seems to mention, discuss or talk about the contamination that is happening globally and specifically the oceans as he continues to lob toxic bombs for his viewing and egoistic pleasures.

Every citizen of Earth deserves the most basic of life-sustaining comforts, yet when food becomes a luxury, when shelter is unattainable, then those in power need to be replaced and a new beginning needs to happen. If these are the first steps to bring help to a needlessly impoverished nation, then so be it.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 08:46 AM
link   
This would make sense if NK was really a cover for the Clowns In America.


edit on 21-11-2017 by fluff007 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 08:54 AM
link   
a reply to: AngelicIRage



This was already posted yesterday.




posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:19 AM
link   
a reply to: AngelicIRage

What strides exactly is he taking by naming NK a state sponsor of terror other than claiming he will impose new sanctions against them? Sanctions don't affect Kim, they affect the civilian populace. Furthermore, exactly what acts of terror has NK or Kim sponsored? Can you name any? The bottom line is that they wouldn't have become a nuclear power (and yes, that cat is out of the bag and there's no putting it back in) had several US administrations not gone back on their promises over several decades. The problem is as much our doing as it is NK's and whoever it is that has helped give them the ability to advance their program by decades in just the last 5 years.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 04:15 PM
link   
Well, looking behind the scenes, it seems old Chubs is getting either a little paranoid or might be wanting to put the cart before the horse when it comes to his own military.

Either they don't like his "great" ideas or Fatty is losing his grip.

www.news.com.au... 77c111

Once you go rogue, you never go back.

Of course, America has seen this and expects some form of action from the little rice munching psycho



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: kurthall

Thanks



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

As could you be. But That's not the issue here, the issue is NK. I don;t know how many more facts you need to know the people of NK are treated by their leader like dogs, not people.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 08:31 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox


What act of terrorism has NK committed???


Let's see, possibly the people of NK??? Or did you miss that memo?



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:17 PM
link   
a reply to: AngelicIRage

It is in no way in that dictators best interest to attack anyone..

As long as Kim gets to rule his little fiefdom, there is no motivation to throw that away by attacking someone , the getting invaded by EVERYONE..

However if NK is invaded, or thinks an invasion is imminent. Then why not launch your nukes??

Your already dead either way..

If trump preemptively attacks Kim any lives lost will be 100% trumps fault..



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:19 PM
link   
a reply to: AngelicIRage

Did you people learn nothing from Iraq????



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: sunkuong

You're right. N. Korea should have nukes because who cares about our safety.

Probably believe in Russia too. (connection)






Your safety, get a grip and switch off your television before the brain damage is permanent.

Of course if you live in south Korea I take back that statement.



posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 11:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: AngelicIRage

i guess it's almost time to go 'free' NK..





Freedumb ,that's what the little dictator needs.



posted on Dec, 4 2017 @ 02:43 AM
link   
This is OMINOUS.

The usually "reserved" National Security Advisor, General H.R. McMaster, stated on Friday that the chances for War with North Korea become more likely every day.
Source: www.bbc.com...

Yesterday and today, several STEALTH bombers/fighters arrived in South Korea. Their role is to disable North Korea's defense radar grid. Because radar can't detect these stealth fighters, they would lead the attack..knocking out North Korea's radar system, before N.K. knew what hit them.
Source: www.cnn.com...



posted on Dec, 4 2017 @ 02:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: AngelicIRage
a reply to: Allaroundyou

I'm so glad you liked the reference. I enjoy making people smile.

Whether or not you agree with me, doesn't matter. Kim is insane and would likely throw whatever he has at us if he had the chance. Kim could very well be the trigger to set of WORLD WAR 3.

Not exactly a laughing matter, is it.






What evidence do you have Kim is insane?

I mean other than the media drivel? You think you are in a position of knowledge, I will believe you If you can show me one little bit if factual information.


I mean something other than regurgitated media nonsense.


edit on 4-12-2017 by hopenotfeariswhatweneed because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join