It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fox News viewers demand reporter Shepard Smith be fired for debunking 'Clinton uranium scandal'

page: 4
20
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 01:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Violater1

originally posted by: Dudemo5
I'm going to write a book called "Why Hillary Clinton is Super Evil!"

It will be loaded with all kinds of fake crap.

I expect to sell millions of copies to the kind of people who believe this Uranium One nonsense.

Hell, I'll have a whole Chapter on Uranium One. It'll be awesome.


I'm sure you'll include another "fake" story about her husband and Monica Lewinsky.


There are plenty of real ones there, but I can make up some more. No problem.




posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 02:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kettu

originally posted by: Dudemo5
I'm going to write a book called "Why Hillary Clinton is Super Evil!"

It will be loaded with all kinds of fake crap.

I expect to sell millions of copies to the kind of people who believe this Uranium One nonsense.

Hell, I'll have a whole Chapter on Uranium One. It'll be awesome.


You've just stumbled onto the same idea a slew of conservative blogs currently operating are already doing. They open up shop, write a bunch of fake crap, load their pages with Google Adsense advertisements and make money.

You can make a surprising amount of money running a fake news site/blog. Telling people what they already want to hear can earn you a lot of page visits. Page visits = advertisement views, and that translates into $$$.

Step two is to then take some of that money and run Facebook advertisements, targeting conservatives. You promote certain "stories", and soon the people on Facebook are liking and sharing your fake stories, getting you even more views!


Honest to God, the thought of doing this is so tempting. I have zero doubt I could make money. There is a core audience in the alt-right that will blindly share anything that says what they want to hear.

Who knows. Maybe one day I'll decide I have fewer morals than a televangelist and I'll go ahead and do it.



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 06:03 AM
link   
666 sick sick sick.
Spread the mirky media, to plumb the depth of time.

News is dumb. Media is dumb.
Turn off the box, invite over friends and talk.



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 06:21 AM
link   
Shepard Smith was just plain wrong.

Hillary's state dept DID approve the deal. That is what Trump said and he was correct. 8 other depts. also approved it.
Smith was incorrect in his statement that Trump's assertion was false.

Smith also just talked his viewers through a process of how things SHOULD work. He completely ignored any notion that back room deals may have happened. He ignored the FBI investigation at the time and claims of bribery.

He sugar coated his liberal point of view and downplayed the actual issues being raised in an effort to pour cold water on a serious issue.

That is why he should be fired.



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 06:26 AM
link   

edit on 11182017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 06:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Throes
Debunking?

www.breitbart.com...




Breitbart???

www.revealnews.org... rz8rLnYIaAqbOEALw_wcB
edit on 11182017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)

edit on 11182017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 06:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

The whole story is completely debunked.
But for grins and giggles we will just let Jeff Sessions tell you all that in his own words after he tells you sorry folks we cannot appoint a special counsel because there is no factual basis for it.
Y'all go on home now. Fields need plowing. Go fill the grocery stores like we pay you to do.
edit on 11182017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 06:41 AM
link   
a reply to: jjkenobi



To be clear it wasn't for "debunking" the story. It was for all the factual errors in his report. Unlike the liberal outlets who gulp the koolaid, false reports on Fox News aren't tolerated by the viewers


Aren't they?

How many times did judge Napolitano say his insider friends told him Hillary was going to be indicted last spring? And how many on here still believe that's possible?
edit on 11182017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 06:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

Thirty? Nope.



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 07:03 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

There won't be any investigators . Sessions as much as said there is no basis for one.

Oh well....



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 07:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: DanteGaland
a reply to: carewemust

Dude. MSNBC has conservatives on ALL THE TIME.
they never tune in so they don't know.
They debate all the time.



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 07:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: DanteGaland
a reply to: carewemust

Dude. MSNBC has conservatives on ALL THE TIME.


So they've improved? I quit watching back when Rachel Maddow turned Anti-American.


Must have been right before she won her Emmy.



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 07:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123




Course, prepare for liberal deflection.


Breitbart...where Before Its News gets its stories from.
Lol



posted on Nov, 18 2017 @ 07:54 AM
link   


He completely ignored any notion that back room deals may have happened


You can't jail someone for something that hypothetically could have happened.

This whole movement is stupid.




top topics



 
20
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join