It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Was The Latest Bombshell a Troll Job by Trump Jr. and WikiLeaks? Wlsearch.tk

page: 3
14
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Dudemo5

OVER ONE MILLION SERVED

don't you know they're all nothing. It's the sheer number of nothingburgers that is truly concerning.



Do you ever purge after your binge posting?

It would help your cause to read the content you comment on occasionally. Or don't. We've become accustomed to unhinged alarmist reactions to 'nuze' about anything Trump related.




posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

What did we know about it last week? Nothing because he had not mentioned it.
We know it now. Now he talks about it. Just like every other piece of evidence that has been leaked. First we learn about it then he admits it. Lol.



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Ksihkehe

Go after the ball .



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Oh, so it's Jr's fault that congress leaked it? Interesting.



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96

Funny though that until yesterday junior never mentioned this communication?


That's because it didn't mean anything and still doesn't.




posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

These are not the droids you are looking for....



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Dfairlite

What did we know about it last week? Nothing because he had not mentioned it.
We know it now. Now he talks about it. Just like every other piece of evidence that has been leaked. First we learn about it then he admits it. Lol.



That's because Congress had all of it.

That means it was classified at the time.




posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: xuenchen

These are not the droids you are looking for....


What are they then ?




posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

So the communication doesn't indicate that there was contact between the Trump campaign and Wikileaks?



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:26 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Did Trump tweet something about Wikileaks during the election 15 minutes after one of these exchanges?



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: xuenchen

So the communication doesn't indicate that there was contact between the Trump campaign and Wikileaks?



originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: xuenchen

Did Trump tweet something about Wikileaks during the election 15 minutes after one of these exchanges?





posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:42 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Strange that it is acceptable for you to try to connect the dots between Hillary and the meeting at Trump tower with little to no validated information and yet we have very solid lines of accepted facts that we are denying.



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ksihkehe


It would help your cause to read the content you comment on occasionally.


Hardly anyone reads before posting. I just assume people don't read the stuff they are responding to, as 95% of the posts on ATS make a lot more sense that way.

Ijits galore.

I'm pretty sure the motto of this site was secretly changed to "Embrace Illiteracy."



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 05:59 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye




Have you told your parents, yet? Finally, they will have something to be proud of!


Finally they may get some return on their investment; after all the hot meals they brought down to his basement.



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 06:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: xuenchen

Strange that it is acceptable for you to try to connect the dots between Hillary and the meeting at Trump tower with little to no validated information and yet we have very solid lines of accepted facts that we are denying.


+
++
+++
What exactly is "acceptable" ?
+++
++
+



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 06:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: xuenchen

Strange that it is acceptable for you to try to connect the dots between Hillary and the meeting at Trump tower with little to no validated information and yet we have very solid lines of accepted facts that we are denying.


+
++
+++
What exactly is "acceptable" ?
+++
++
+


A word that the person you're responding to attributed to YOU, to suggest that YOU were perfectly fine with applying your hattery of posteriors in a flagrant double standard.



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Oh god are you Q now? What it comes down to are double standards and deflection. You and many other Trump supporters talk out of both sides of your mouths. You have different standards on if something either supports or doesn't support your viewpoints. Sometimes I wonder if you are employed by the administration. You would make Kellanne Conway proud, in fact maybe you are her. All you guys do is throw out misinformation and pivot.



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 06:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Dudemo5

a reply to: mzinga

Need I say anymore ?

tik tik tik tik tik tik





posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 06:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Dudemo5

a reply to: mzinga

Need I say anymore ?

tik tik tik tik tik tik






Your troll skills have deteriorated dramatically over the past couple of months.
Bad health?



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dudemo5

originally posted by: Ksihkehe


It would help your cause to read the content you comment on occasionally.


Hardly anyone reads before posting. I just assume people don't read the stuff they are responding to, as 95% of the posts on ATS make a lot more sense that way.

Ijits galore.

I'm pretty sure the motto of this site was secretly changed to "Embrace Illiteracy."



Interesting perspective. Not true, at all, but interesting.




top topics



 
14
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join