It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

STUDY - Women Are Less Likely To Receive Life-Saving C.P.R. from Passerbys.

page: 3
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 02:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: DexterRiley
I thought there was a new accepted form of CPR that doesn't require all of machinations of the past. You just press on the upper abdomen to keep the blood flowing, but not hard enough to cause any damage.

Seems like you can stay clear of all the naughty bits if you do that.

-dex





Glad you pointed that out, I thought you grabbed both tits, squeezed them together and start suckling. That could have been embarrassing.
edit on 14-11-2017 by hopenotfeariswhatweneed because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 03:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: DexterRiley
I thought there was a new accepted form of CPR that doesn't require all of machinations of the past. You just press on the upper abdomen to keep the blood flowing, but not hard enough to cause any damage.

Seems like you can stay clear of all the naughty bits if you do that.

-dex

Glad you pointed that out, I thought you grabbed both tits, squeezed them together and start suckling. That could have been embarrassing.


LMAO! I'm pretty sure that's not the best approach.

What I was referring to is something like Hands only CPR. It looks a little less involved than the full routine. But, I'm far from an expert.

-dex



posted on Nov, 14 2017 @ 03:39 AM
link   
a reply to: DexterRiley

Pretty sure my way of looking at it is hands on.



 
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join