It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Are The "Trump Tapes" Fake or Not!?

page: 7
8
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 5 2017 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Get used to the phrase "President Pence."




posted on Dec, 5 2017 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Get used to FAKE NEWS getting it wrong and Trump having a 2-term Presidency.

White House: Mueller has not subpoenaed Trump’s bank records



posted on Dec, 5 2017 @ 06:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Get used to FAKE NEWS getting it wrong and Trump having a 2-term Presidency.

White House: Mueller has not subpoenaed Trump’s bank records

In case you haven't noticed, Sanders is a liar.



posted on Dec, 5 2017 @ 06:58 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

The story is from Whitehouse lawyers. You are wrong and you'd be lying if you say this story is real. FAKE NEWS!



posted on Dec, 5 2017 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Keep on believing.



posted on Dec, 8 2017 @ 12:49 AM
link   
Those Access Hollywood tapes don't even have a real conversation between Billy Bush, and Trump. Billy's parts are mere chuckles, and sighs. So yes, a NGO could have dummied them up. But more importantly, someone broke Federal Laws by using captured radio transmissions to deliberately cause harm to one of two communicators. These two had one way mics, so the one recording their talk, couldn't get into their conversation. Ergo, he or she, eavesdropped on Trump and Bush.

Years later, just before the election, this was spewed out to defame Trump, and whoever did it needs to go to prison for violating the Communications Act of 1934, and resultant case law. That law came well before T.V. was invented. They should only have a legal claim to the audio video feed, after Trump and Bush came out of their bus.

And just like Bob Hope did when the red light came on at his USO shows, Trump immediately cleaned up his act. That red light meant that Hope was now on T.V. Otherwise, his USO troupes were meat parades, for the G.I.'s. No one has ever rubbed Hope's face into what he said or did, before that red light came on, in his USO shows for our Troops.



posted on Dec, 8 2017 @ 01:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: carpooler
Those Access Hollywood tapes don't even have a real conversation between Billy Bush, and Trump. Billy's parts are mere chuckles, and sighs. So yes, a NGO could have dummied them up. But more importantly, someone broke Federal Laws by using captured radio transmissions to deliberately cause harm to one of two communicators. These two had one way mics, so the one recording their talk, couldn't get into their conversation. Ergo, he or she, eavesdropped on Trump and Bush.

Years later, just before the election, this was spewed out to defame Trump, and whoever did it needs to go to prison for violating the Communications Act of 1934, and resultant case law. That law came well before T.V. was invented. They should only have a legal claim to the audio video feed, after Trump and Bush came out of their bus.

And just like Bob Hope did when the red light came on at his USO shows, Trump immediately cleaned up his act. That red light meant that Hope was now on T.V. Otherwise, his USO troupes were meat parades, for the G.I.'s. No one has ever rubbed Hope's face into what he said or did, before that red light came on, in his USO shows for our Troops.


The were being recorded because they were mic'd up for the show they were on. They knew they could be recorded. So no they were not being taped illegally.
edit on 8-12-2017 by Pyle because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2017 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Keep on believing.


I keep on seeing you missing the truth. Maybe you can't handle the truth.

Bloomberg Corrects Bombshell Trump Bank Records Story




Trump’s attorney John Dowd denied the original Bloomberg article. “We have confirmed that the news reports that the Special Counsel had subpoenaed financial records relating to the president are false. No subpoena has been issued or received. We have confirmed this with the bank and other sources,” Dowd wrote in a statment.


edit on 8-12-2017 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 04:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle
Pyle; It isn't illegal for you or for me to have also recorded those, in the bus, hot mics. But it's very much illegal for you, me, or the Access crew, to use over the air recorded conversations, like from a wireless phone, or analog cell transmission, to defame one of the people in that private conversation. While they were in that bus, any and all transmissions were really only audio feed tests. You don't lose your rights to private conversations, due to a boutonniere mic's needed audio testing.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 05:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Keep on believing.


I keep on seeing you missing the truth. Maybe you can't handle the truth.

Bloomberg Corrects Bombshell Trump Bank Records Story




Trump’s attorney John Dowd denied the original Bloomberg article. “We have confirmed that the news reports that the Special Counsel had subpoenaed financial records relating to the president are false. No subpoena has been issued or received. We have confirmed this with the bank and other sources,” Dowd wrote in a statment.



That is not a correction but an update. The bank may be under gag order to not tell Trump and his lawyer.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle




The bank may be under gag order to not tell Trump and his lawyer.


Or there is NO ORDER for Trumps Bank Statements. I believe Trumps lawyers would need to be told and furnished with any inquiries and warrants per laws.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 08:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Pyle




The bank may be under gag order to not tell Trump and his lawyer.


Or there is NO ORDER for Trumps Bank Statements. I believe Trumps lawyers would need to be told and furnished with any inquiries and warrants per laws.


You would be wrong.



posted on Dec, 9 2017 @ 08:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Pyle




The bank may be under gag order to not tell Trump and his lawyer.


Or there is NO ORDER for Trumps Bank Statements. I believe Trumps lawyers would need to be told and furnished with any inquiries and warrants per laws.


You would be wrong.


Or I could be right. Who knows at this time.



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join