It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Navy Admiral sends warning to Congress

page: 2
20
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Dizrael

1. Terrorism is not real..nor is it a real threat to USA or anything.
2. Why do we need an expensive/ineffective fleet? So more admirals and commanders can do coke in foreign places off of the body of hookers?
3. What peace? All I see are mini wars going on all over the world and people getting shot everyday by police or new mass shootings every week by some nut case.

War is the last thing anyone should be worried about.




posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Its finding that middle ground between advanced tech and readiness. Yes it's nice to have really fancy toys but they're useless if they can't be maintained quickly enough. That's one of the things that Germany hard in Ww2 yes some their weapons were advanced but just couldn't cope with the numbers of less advanced weapons that were easier and quicker to build.



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: SR1TX
a reply to: Dizrael

1. Terrorism is not real..nor is it a real threat to USA or anything.
2. Why do we need an expensive/ineffective fleet? So more admirals and commanders can do coke in foreign places off of the body of hookers?
3. What peace? All I see are mini wars going on all over the world and people getting shot everyday by police or new mass shootings every week by some nut case.

War is the last thing anyone should be worried about.

Pretty sure number 2 was the Royal Navy and she wasn't a hooker just a damn attractive sailor. Also number 1 I think the victims of numerous bombings and also 9/11 would disagree
edit on 9-11-2017 by Woody510 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Woody510

Where is said opposing force going to go, exactly?

What navy has the capability of getting that close without getting tomahawked to death?

Honestly, the dream world people live in....



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Woody510

So which country were the people responsible for 9/11 from?

Who was officially named?

Would us having more f18 hornets that day of saved us? Air craft carriers?

What have the wars subsequently following produced. Still at war I see? How many f18's did we have then compared to now?

SNIP
edit on 11/9/2017 by Blaine91555 because: Snipped rude remark.



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: SR1TX
Why do we need that many to be ready or any at all?

Who are we at war with?


Yes comrade SR1TX. I am sure you and your NK pals would love to have us be so vulnerable.

Obvious Russian trolls are obvious now.



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:28 PM
link   

edit on 11/9/2017 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:30 PM
link   

edit on 11/9/2017 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: SR1TX
a reply to: Woody510

So which country were the people responsible for 9/11 from?

Who was officially named?

Would us having more f18 hornets that day of saved us? Air craft carriers?

What have the wars subsequently following produced. Still at war I see? How many f18's did we have then compared to now?

Again. you are all delusional.

I was clearly showing you that terrorism is a threat and real.
Does the Manchester bombing ring any bells?
7/7 in London?
9/11?
The Boston bombing?
But of course these didn't happen only in my delusional little world! Yeah ok mate you carry on living in your nice little bubble where we're all friends.

edit on 9-11-2017 by Woody510 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: SR1TX

1. Please explain how terrorism isn't real, and make sure you explain that to families of everyone that died on 9/11
2. Stop saying our fleet is ineffective, you have no idea what you are talking about
3. Trust me, it would be a lot worse if our enemies thought we had no military


(post by SR1TX removed for a manners violation)
(post by SR1TX removed for a manners violation)

posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: SR1TX

I'm done responding to you, clearly you don't get it.


(post by SR1TX removed for a manners violation)

posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: SR1TX
a reply to: Dizrael

1. Who was responsible for 9/11?
2. Where is it effective now? Why?
3. What enemies? Who is the enemy????

Paranoid delusion on full display.




One of those 2 I'll let you decide which one.



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: SR1TX
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.




Sure, Comrade. I believe you.




posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:46 PM
link   
Attention:

The topic is not each other or opinions of each other.

Do not reply to this post.



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: SR1TX

1. Terrorists from the middle east that were unaffiliated with a specific country
2. It is effective in every theater it is used, they are constantly upgraded. For an aircraft to last thing long it had to be prime of its roll.
3. We are at war in the middle east STILL, Lil Kim is always acting up, and there will always be the unknown. That's why its called being prepared. Not getting ready when it's too late, but being ready before its needed.


edit on 9-11-2017 by Dizrael because: removing previously removed quote



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

I was shocked to hear several years ago from a B-2 mechanic how many planes were actually operational versus how many were used for parts



posted on Nov, 9 2017 @ 03:58 PM
link   
So now that we've got that out of our system....

I saw something interesting the other week, and didn't really think about it. Now it makes me wonder. We went past Tinker, which does Depot level work on large aircraft for the Air Force. As we went by, I noticed a single EA-6B parked on the ramp, being prepared for a flight.

With as backed up as the Navy facilities are, I wonder if they'll run some AF Depot guys through a quicky course for Navy aircraft, and move some Navy guys over and start running NavAir through their Depot to catch up.



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join