-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account-

a reply to: Tulpa

This article is probably relevant

Did Schiff get caught in an elaborate Sting

is there a twatter blackout going on?

i dont partake

im hearing 8500 sealed indictments?

is that right?

is it us?

see yall in gitmo!

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: Tulpa

This article is probably relevant

Did Schiff get caught in an elaborate Sting

Zinger!!!

Sounds more like it.

a reply to: dashen

Keep em coming dashen! luvin the updates.

I`ve followed along everyday , I don`t visit those other sites so appreciate yours and others efforts for us all here.

a reply to: gps777

My sentiments exactly.

There's some good updates on you tube but here we get to join in.

Well, that's certainly ironic if true... If Schiff goes down, that'd be a huge boost to the credibility of whatever is going on with Q.

A month ago, Roseanne Barr mentioned talking to Qanon. Her twitter page and website then suddenly disappeared. After she re-emerged, she said she would "explain everything". To this date not only has she not explained anything, but her references to Qanon appear to be removed from her twitter page.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
A month ago, Roseanne Barr mentioned talking to Qanon. Her twitter page and website then suddenly disappeared. After she re-emerged, she said she would "explain everything". To this date not only has she not explained anything, but her references to Qanon appear to be removed from her twitter page.

Yep, I remember that. It was weird what happened to her page. I haven't heard anything since either, not that I follow her or anything.

a reply to: RadioRobert

Kinda like the Holy Rollers who are into Kid Porn or Homosexual Escorts.

The Possibility of a sting setup for finding leakers can't be dismissed.

originally posted by: RadioRobert

Well, that's certainly ironic if true... If Schiff goes down, that'd be a huge boost to the credibility of whatever is going on with Q.

That would CONFIRM the credibility of Q!!! That would mean they had knowledge that he had made a deal with someone (Probably many, many, women) to accept money to come forward with false allegations against President Trump. There will be no proof beyond "recollection" and maybe a photo here or there of him pinching some woman's ass 35 years ago, and people will marry that to his grab em by the pussy video and voila, Trump is convicted by the MeToo movement.

Ahh but wait, Q was there all along, and has the PROOF that these allegations were paid for, to the tune of 8 million dollars.


Huge. Yuge.

If you are following Q on Twitter...this could prove to be an important interaction. I posted screenshots of my ATS post on his Tweet "[C]oordinated effort to misdirect"...we are all smart here. Just be aware of this conversation taking place and in the event it unfolds, be aware of it. I think this could prove to be potentially disastrous if people don't use their heads. This person/these people have all but put their money where their mouth is at this point...it's an elaborate LARP...or someone wants you to believe it's an elaborate LARP. Be ready to spot the difference.

originally posted by: ToeKneeCherry1984
"[C]oordinated effort to misdirect"

ironic
that pretty much sums up my thoughts on Qanon

a reply to: njord

Time will tell...that is certain.

Bombing in NYC port authority bus terminal.
The flags are beginning

originally posted by: ToeKneeCherry1984
a reply to: Tulpa

Latest Q is a doozy. MQNDAY. Verbatim.

And we just got a report of a subway bombing in N.Y. this morning...

a reply to: Martin75

Still haven't found source for mQnday

a reply to: Martin75

I've been trying to tell people...this isn't about some guy or girl or group trolling people. If nothing else the goal is to get people paying attention. And so far, I can't think of a single thing that has been forecasted that HAS happened that can be disproved.

The CIA’s “threat” to WikiLeaks is “unprecedented,” Robert L. Deitz, who served as senior counselor to CIA Director Michael Hayden from 2006 until February 2009, and general counsel at the National Security Agency from 1998 to 2006, told WND.

“It’s pretty unusual for the CIA to make a threat to WikiLeaks so publicly. It’s pretty unprecedented; one ought to be skeptical about this. That is not the way that CIA officials should operate,” he said. “This is not the way the CIA director ought to behave. CIA directors don’t go around threatening.”

Link

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Martin75

Still haven't found source for mQnday

I just tried to track it down, Q posted earlier in the morning that a crumb was "removed" and the way it was implied was it wasn't by the account holder...