It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account-

page: 254
175
<< 251  252  253    255  256  257 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 09:48 PM
link   
when is he doing them? I checked his schedule but didn't see anything solid. or is he twitting it?




posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 09:50 PM
link   



posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 09:52 PM
link   
Web Archive



There's definitely something not right here not everybody is asleep LOL



posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 10:04 PM
link   
BREAKING NEWS! HE WAS JUST FOUND DEAD AFTER EXPOSING PODESTAS!

Exton were responsible for the two e-fit sketches, that were released in the search for the Madeline McCann abductor(s), and which bore more than a passing resemblance to John and Tony Podesta.

Exton



posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 10:05 PM
link   
This may be relevant here; a direct connection between the Clinton's
and the Australian involved with the "dossier", via donations
To The Clinton Foundation.

The FBI in investigating!



An Australian investigative journalist who is a retired police detective said Tuesday he has been asked to provide the FBI with details about multiple allegations of mishandling millions of dollars contributed to the Clinton Foundation by the Aussie government.

“I have been asked to provide the FBI with further and better particulars about allegations regarding improper donations to the CF funded by Australian taxpayers,” Michael Smith told LifeZette.

At the center of Smith’s complaints are former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, and multiple Australian government officials, including senior diplomat Alexander Downer, that government’s high commissioner to the United Kingdom.


www.lifezette.com...

Alexander Dowling is the Australian who was involved with
the discredited "dossier".

This article goes on cite an Autralian Guvernment memo
that links Downer to Bill Clinton.

So, pretty much the circle is complete on the dossier.
Now all we need is the report from the IG, and a special prosecutor!



edit on 16-1-2018 by burntheships because: (no reason given)

edit on 16-1-2018 by burntheships because: (no reason given)

edit on 16-1-2018 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 10:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Trillium


:[AGAIN] direct pre-knowledge. :[AGAIN] warning ALERT. Think BDT. >Shall we play a game? >How about a nice game of CHESS?



posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 10:31 PM
link   
488 pages of previously sealed VEGAS documents.
Doc


edit on 16-1-2018 by Trillium because: (no reason given)

edit on 16-1-2018 by Trillium because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 10:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Trillium
488 pages of previously sealed VEGAS documents.
docs.wixstatic.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Doc


quick turnaround on these latest crumbs. time must almost be up


BEWARE of MAJOR FALSE FLAG attempts this week.

KNOW your surroundings.

CHANGE OF NEWS CYCLE WILL BE NEEDED.

ABILITY to ATTACK LIMITED>[ISIS on LIFE SUPPORT]

Tactics shift to threats and hostages to obtain rogue_ops.

SILENCE [187] - no risk [no capture - dead on arrival].

SILENCE [LV]?

SILENCE [LV witnesses]?

SILENCE [LV-FBI]?

SILENCE WILL NOT LAST FOREVER.

TRUST.

Q



posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 10:40 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Thanks for bringing this thread back to the BIG FISH!



posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 11:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

Now all we need is the report from the IG, and a special prosecutor!




a refresher summary of the report for all:
oig.justice.gov...

*Review of Allegations Regarding Various Actions by the Department of Justice and the FBI in Advance of the 2016 Election
The OIG, in response to Congressional and other requests, is reviewing allegations regarding various actions by the Department and the FBI in advance of the 2016 election. The review will examine whether the Department and the FBI followed policies or procedures in connection with, or in actions leading up to or related to, the FBI Director’s public announcement on July 5, 2016, and the Director’s letters to Congress on October 28 and November 6, 2016, and whether certain underlying investigative decisions were based on improper considerations. The review also will examine allegations that the FBI Deputy Director should have been recused from participating in certain investigative matters, that the Department’s Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs improperly disclosed non-public information and/or should have been recused from participating in certain matters, that other Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information, and that decisions regarding the timing of the FBI’s release of certain Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents on October 30 and November 1, 2016, and the use of a Twitter account to publicize this release, were influenced by improper considerations. The review will not substitute the OIG's judgment for the judgments made by the FBI or the Department regarding the substantive merits of investigative or prosecutive decisions. If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review.*



posted on Jan, 16 2018 @ 11:29 PM
link   
a reply to: PolyCottonBlend

Regarding your link: oig.justice.gov...

That is A LOT of "Ongoing Work"! Does the Office of Inspector General have enough manpower and resources to conduct all of those reviews, inspections, and investigations simultaneously? I wonder how they're prioritized.



posted on Jan, 17 2018 @ 12:17 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

Do you remember the Bay of Tomkin



files.abovetopsecret.com...


"UPDATE: NEW EVIDENCE!!! WITH VERY GOOD REASON I REPEAT: ISRAEL IS NOW SHORT A DOLPHIN 2 SUBMARINE AND ANYONE WITH A DIFFERENT STORY IS FULL OF IT. They needed their false flag and world war 3 to shut Trump down now that he's the Orkin man after the critters. HEADS UP FOLKS, IT MAY BE GETTING HOT OUTSIDE YOUR WINDOW SOON." jimstone.is



posted on Jan, 17 2018 @ 01:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Trillium

If a sub was destroyed, there might be seismic signatures of such activity if one knew how to find said signatures.

I know a few tricks, gimme a couple of days and I'll see what I can scrounge up.
edit on 17-1-2018 by jadedANDcynical because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2018 @ 02:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Perfectenemy

So both Billy boy and Huma were there at the same time?

Things that make you go, "hmmm..."


What was Huma doing there and did anyone ever find out about the body on the airstrip?


Turns out that the body on the Runway was a stowaway, as AndyFromMichigan predicted. Only this guy was trying to fly OUT of Hawaii in a wheel well. "Evidence" on the runway covered 800 feet. (Body parts?)

Sorry, but this publication doesn't allow copy/paste, for some reason. Here's a direct link to the article:
www.hawaiinewsnow.com...

Maybe he was scared to death by the missile alert a few hours earlier, and just wanted to get the hell off the island!



posted on Jan, 17 2018 @ 02:51 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Looks like we just caught a big mole responsible for "one of the worst intelligence failures in decades" and resulting in at least one death. Mole operation time began around 2010ish. Fox News source. IMO this is Big News.



posted on Jan, 17 2018 @ 02:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Ameilia


If this ex-CIA mole went "rouge" (or whatever the term is), why does it reflect poorly on the CIA? He was terminated in 2007, but kept some Top-Secret documents.



posted on Jan, 17 2018 @ 03:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Ameilia


If this ex-CIA mole went "rouge" (or whatever the term is), why does it reflect poorly on the CIA? He was terminated in 2007, but kept some Top-Secret documents.



I don't think it reflects poorly on the CIA. Anyone can go rogue at any time, under any agency, in any country. It just happens.

However, the fact he is NOW caught, instead of being caught under Obama between 2010ish when he started operating and 2017 when Obama left office - doesn't that speak to (maybe) some credibility and "get it done" attitude in the NEW administration? Kinda like how we pushed ISIS back under Trump, but not under Obama.



posted on Jan, 17 2018 @ 03:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ameilia

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Ameilia


If this ex-CIA mole went "rouge" (or whatever the term is), why does it reflect poorly on the CIA? He was terminated in 2007, but kept some Top-Secret documents.



I don't think it reflects poorly on the CIA. Anyone can go rogue at any time, under any agency, in any country. It just happens.

However, the fact he is NOW caught, instead of being caught under Obama between 2010ish when he started operating and 2017 when Obama left office - doesn't that speak to (maybe) some credibility and "get it done" attitude in the NEW administration? Kinda like how we pushed ISIS back under Trump, but not under Obama.


Oh..I see what you mean. Right! There are many ways to Make America Even Greater. Thanks for explaining that angle.



posted on Jan, 17 2018 @ 07:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Trillium

If this really was an attempt to start WWIII, then what do we make of the fact that the Clintons & Huma Abedin were there?

I can think of 2 scenarios:

(1) The Deep State was hoping to eliminate them. Certainly the Clinton gang has long since passed the point where their liabilities outweigh their usefulness.

(2) The Clintons (and Huma) were planning to fake their deaths. In this scenario, they were never really in Hawaii, or were only there briefly before departing again for somewhere outside the United States. Do we have any proof they were actually there? Even in that Tweet someone posted, a person was asking the guy if he'd actually seen the Clintons.

The key will be the claim that the submarine was sunk. No modern navy can hide a lost ship; people have families that will wonder what happened to them. If Israel, or some other nation, reports a submarine being lost in an "accident" in the near future, then we'll have to take a good hard look to see if this might be the reason.

I recall that Argentina lost a submarine recently, but they're not a nuclear power, are they?



posted on Jan, 17 2018 @ 07:21 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

He could have been an illegal immigrant from some place like China, and was hoping to make his way to the mainland US.



new topics




 
175
<< 251  252  253    255  256  257 >>

log in

join