It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Liberal Media - Stop Embarrassing Yourselves

page: 8
39
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Deaf Alien

www.pewresearch.org...

23% liberal gun ownership. It's far from idiotic.


I dare say your statement is ignorant.

Why link me to a stats about black people?


You can't be serious.

Wait, I guess you are. Since you couldn't be bothered to read the OP, I guess you also couldn't be bothered to read the whole page of data, just the part you deemed necessary.

I see that you haven't really disputed his statement about liberals.
I'll make it easier for you by giving you a simple example:
www.theliberalgunclub.com...




posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: jacquesdarippa




OK the part where he was trying make it seem like they were making the claim he used a chainsaw bayonet....


You can move the goalpost, I'll allow it.

How about reading what he wrote and not "trying to make it seem like" it's something it's not?

Seems like reasonable request.


I am not moving the goalpost. LOL I am using his own statement, not a created one but his own words.

So point out the part where he stated ..USA today was showing a video about possible combinations along with the chainsaw bayonet. Also show where he clarified he was not implying USA today said they claimed the gun man was using a chainsaw bayonet but that it was one possible attachment.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

I don't think anyone was actually insulted, we might have felt a need to respond to being told that we had reading comprehension problems in order to brush off our observations of what was actually said, so we did.


edit on 8-11-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Deaf Alien

www.pewresearch.org...

23% liberal gun ownership. It's far from idiotic.


I dare say your statement is ignorant.

Why link me to a stats about black people?


You can't be serious.

Wait, I guess you are. Since you couldn't be bothered to read the OP, I guess you also couldn't be bothered to read the whole page of data, just the part you deemed necessary.

I see that you haven't really disputed his statement about liberals.
I'll make it easier for you by giving you a simple example:
www.theliberalgunclub.com...


Were pictures too hard to understand? I mean there was graphs and everything. You could have also read.

Since you chose to link to me a liberal gun club link, I'll just spell it out for you.

The statistics show that 23% of liberals in the US own guns. Are you guys getting denser by the day? To explain to you raw statistics that require minimal reading is really friggen tedious.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Deaf Alien

www.pewresearch.org...

23% liberal gun ownership. It's far from idiotic.


I dare say your statement is ignorant.

Why link me to a stats about black people?


You can't be serious.

Wait, I guess you are. Since you couldn't be bothered to read the OP, I guess you also couldn't be bothered to read the whole page of data, just the part you deemed necessary.

I see that you haven't really disputed his statement about liberals.
I'll make it easier for you by giving you a simple example:
www.theliberalgunclub.com...


He did address my statement about liberals.

He proved me right.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Deaf Alien

www.pewresearch.org...

23% liberal gun ownership. It's far from idiotic.


I dare say your statement is ignorant.

Why link me to a stats about black people?


You can't be serious.

Wait, I guess you are. Since you couldn't be bothered to read the OP, I guess you also couldn't be bothered to read the whole page of data, just the part you deemed necessary.

I see that you haven't really disputed his statement about liberals.
I'll make it easier for you by giving you a simple example:
www.theliberalgunclub.com...


He did address my statement about liberals.

He proved me right.


Nope he didn't He linked to a site about black people.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: JinMI

I don't think anyone was actually insulted, we might have felt a need to respond to being told that we had reading comprehension problems in order to brush off our observations of what was actually said, so we did.



You've been twisting the plain words of my op, along with the other 2.

What was actually said has been lost on you.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: projectvxn

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Deaf Alien

www.pewresearch.org...

23% liberal gun ownership. It's far from idiotic.


I dare say your statement is ignorant.

Why link me to a stats about black people?


You can't be serious.

Wait, I guess you are. Since you couldn't be bothered to read the OP, I guess you also couldn't be bothered to read the whole page of data, just the part you deemed necessary.

I see that you haven't really disputed his statement about liberals.
I'll make it easier for you by giving you a simple example:
www.theliberalgunclub.com...


He did address my statement about liberals.

He proved me right.


Nope he didn't He linked to a site about black people.


He linked to the Pew Research Center moron.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: jacquesdarippa




If not an issue then why did you try to make the claim the story was saying he used a chainsaw bayonet.

Please quote that statement.





This story shows an image that USA Today used to depict the rifle used by the gunman in Sunderland, Texas.


And then you added...




It's an AR15 with a god damned chainsaw bayonet. A chainsaw bayonet folks.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:18 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Sighs. You are getting boring.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:18 PM
link   
a reply to: jacquesdarippa





I am not moving the goalpost. LOL I am using his own statement, not a created one but his own words.


That is exactly what you did when you claimed:



OK the part where he was trying make it seem like they were making the claim he used a chainsaw bayonet....


The article did that, the OP is pointing it out.




So point out the part where he stated ..USA today was showing a video about possible combinations along with the chainsaw bayonet. Also show where he clarified he was not implying USA today said they claimed the gun man was using a chainsaw bayonet but that it was one possible attachment.


Is there a video showing a chainsaw as a possible attachment?



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:18 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn



I'm not leaving anything out. Nothing was edited or changed.


You did not say anything about the attachment being a real option.



It's an obvious propaganda move to include such a silly and incredibly uncommon accessory in a presentation about the damned Texas church shooting.


They did not say is was used in the Texas shooting. Only as it being an option, which it is.



That was my point. My larger point about the majority of liberals being clueless about laws, policy, and guns themselves stands as fact.


Any evidence of that claim?



This is evidenced by constantly calling for laws we already have, improperly identifying weapons and weapon parts, using incorrect terminology, or having their ideas of ballistics and sound suppression colored by Hollywood. Which is largely liberal. Now we have a liberal publication creating a video depicting the Texas shooters' rifle, and dropping tidbits of BS like the chainsaw.


Hollywood?

So you don't have evidence?

You just parrot the same ole bat# nonsense.



It's embarrassing. That context has been the context of my OP regardless of what you and your little forum gang want to make it out to be.


What context?

It appears to be nuttery.
edit on 8-11-2017 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: JinMI

Sighs. You are getting boring.


I know. Words, facts and the ability to comprehend them is boring business. Perhaps you should move on eh?



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:19 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn


moron

FYI ad hominem is a sign that you have lost the argument.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: JinMI

Sighs. You are getting boring.


I know. Words, facts and the ability to comprehend them is boring business. Perhaps you should move on eh?

Yeah. Good advice for yourself.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:21 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn

What was actually said by you is a matter of record and what the media showed is also there for all to see.

Your plain words don't coincide with what the video showed. No twisting, by me, is needed.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:21 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




You did not say anything about the attachment being a real option.


Wasn't part of my point was it?




That was my point. My larger point about the majority of liberals being clueless about laws, policy, and guns themselves stands as fact.


Read back a page. A Pew link was dropped.




Hollywood? So you don;t have evidence? You just parrot the same ole bat# nonsense.


With the way liberals describe guns and what they do it sounds like something out of Hollywood. Or are you gonna dispute that Hollywood isn't liberal?



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: jacquesdarippa





I am not moving the goalpost. LOL I am using his own statement, not a created one but his own words.


That is exactly what you did when you claimed:



OK the part where he was trying make it seem like they were making the claim he used a chainsaw bayonet....


The article did that, the OP is pointing it out.




So point out the part where he stated ..USA today was showing a video about possible combinations along with the chainsaw bayonet. Also show where he clarified he was not implying USA today said they claimed the gun man was using a chainsaw bayonet but that it was one possible attachment.


Is there a video showing a chainsaw as a possible attachment?


Sorry but he lied and you are really not helping anyone out.
Gold star for trying though.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Sometimes it's a sign that you're being dense and purposefully difficult.



posted on Nov, 8 2017 @ 11:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: JinMI

Sighs. You are getting boring.


I know. Words, facts and the ability to comprehend them is boring business. Perhaps you should move on eh?

Yeah. Good advice for yourself.


Says the guy who claimed I linked him something for black people?

Sober up.



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join