It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: fromtheskydown
originally posted by: clt1994
This incident occurred in 1992 here in Canada, more info here.
www.youtube.com...
Who has proven this video fake by the way?
The video link posted by 'humanoidlord' precedes yours by four years, although the comments are in French. However, as you rightly ask, who has debunked this? I spent over an hour trying to find something and came up with a big fat zero.
By the way, the member further up who claims $100, a trip to the craft store and his 12 year old daughter could recreate this. Look a bit closer at the alien...or prop...in the video. Musculature, bone structure, ribs, skin discolouration, they are all present. I'm not saying this isn't a fake but your claim is somewhat ridiculous.
Once again, motive has to come into it being called-out as a fake. Did anybody achieve fame, cover themselves in glory or rake in the the big bucks for this video? Let's not forget, it is allegedly around 25 years old and the technology...let alone the cost...was not so easy to achieve as it may be nowadays.
Just my opinion.
originally posted by: clt1994
originally posted by: fromtheskydown
originally posted by: clt1994
This incident occurred in 1992 here in Canada, more info here.
www.youtube.com...
Who has proven this video fake by the way?
The video link posted by 'humanoidlord' precedes yours by four years, although the comments are in French. However, as you rightly ask, who has debunked this? I spent over an hour trying to find something and came up with a big fat zero.
By the way, the member further up who claims $100, a trip to the craft store and his 12 year old daughter could recreate this. Look a bit closer at the alien...or prop...in the video. Musculature, bone structure, ribs, skin discolouration, they are all present. I'm not saying this isn't a fake but your claim is somewhat ridiculous.
Once again, motive has to come into it being called-out as a fake. Did anybody achieve fame, cover themselves in glory or rake in the the big bucks for this video? Let's not forget, it is allegedly around 25 years old and the technology...let alone the cost...was not so easy to achieve as it may be nowadays.
Just my opinion.
How is my claim ridiculous exactly? I never one stated if it WAS genuine, i'm just stating no one has disproved it to my knowledge. And transferring camcorder tape footage to vhs back then, CERTAINLY did not cost a fortune. Many camcorders had an output cable, that you could plug into the input of a VHS player, and record onto a blank VHS tape. In 1992, to do this wouldn't be costly at all.
My guess is, either the source of the video or someone who had possession of the vhs copy, probably sometime in the late 1990s or more likely early 2000s,back when the internet just began booming, had bought and used a cheap usb capture card, i.e. EasyCap, which would have been pretty simple and rather inexpensive to buy, to export vhs footage to .avi... And finally upload to the internet for viewing.
Back around 2010 i bought one of those mentioned easycaps on ebay for about $20 delivered to my door from china, so its logical to say, that it wouldn't be farfetched, considering ebay existed back then, that they were certainly affordable to an average citizen, maybe $100ish tops back in the early '00s?
Obviously its possible it's fake,as we do not have the original tape,nevermind a source to talk to for analysis.....
My only conclusions are the facts, which are:
A. The original tape has never been found for analysis.
B. The footage hasn't been debunked (to my knowledge at this time)
C. The source of the video has never been identified.
originally posted by: clt1994
My only conclusions are the facts, which are:
A. The original tape has never been found for analysis.
B. The footage hasn't been debunked (to my knowledge at this time)
C. The source of the video has never been identified.
originally posted by: fromtheskydown
a reply to: free_spirit
I searched the Internet for debunking information and found none...but that doesn't mean there isn't any out there.
originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: free_spirit
wtf?!
no i mean the original pictures! explain how they are fake!
my god its hard to bribe you into saying something...
originally posted by: jaymp
One of the worst fakes I've ever seen, but I did enjoy the thread title. lol
originally posted by: free_spirit
originally posted by: clt1994
My only conclusions are the facts, which are:
A. The original tape has never been found for analysis.
B. The footage hasn't been debunked (to my knowledge at this time)
C. The source of the video has never been identified.
Your conclusions are wrong and the facts you mentioned are also wrong.
A- Of course " The original tape " has never been found BECAUSE there was not an original tape.
All the images are photographs originally from the hoaxers. The subsequent video created by
a certain opportunist who filmed the photos from the Internet created the confusion.
B- The footage hasn't been debunked to your knowledge? Your knowledge is wrong because the
footage is not a source, the photographs are the source and they are fakes.
C- The source of the video has never been identified? Wrrog, the source of the video has been identified
and goes to 2008 but again, the video is not a source of verification, it is just a copy in bad quality of the
photographs originally published in internet. Any investigation must be made to these photos not the video.
I suggest you read my last post, I provided information and links of the sources although the story is fake.