It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: face23785
They are bogus because you don't like them. Got it.
The biggest number in my OP was 1,021. The fact you can't understand it is very, very sad.
There is a science to polling. You don't have to poll every single person in the country. You just have to poll a small number and interpolate the results with a factor of error. Of course, how you frame a polling question is very important. Many people engineer polling questions to be elicit desired results. The number of people polled is not as big a deal if it is done right.
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: face23785
Land line polls are absolutely absurd.
The study was conducted for CNN via telephone by SSRS, an independent research company. Interviews were conducted from Nov ember 2, 2017 – November 5 2017 among a sample of 1,021 respondents. The landline total respondents were 411 and there were 610 of cell phone respondents.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: face23785
A new poll from the same Fake News Network that, a day earlier, went out of it's way to accuse Trump of overfeeding fish in Japan by editing film?
The Electoral College Poll a year ago was the most accurate.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: face23785
If it was an election poll, then I think you might have a point.
But it's an approval-rating poll. So, it makes sense to just randomly ask a certain number of Americans if they approve of the job Trump's doing or not -- regardless of whether they vote, or not...or are registered, or not, etc.
originally posted by: face23785
They didn't though, they specifically went for only registered voters....
...Did anyone read the entire OP before responding? Is it really that long or complicated?
Among the entire sample, 32% described themselves as Democrats, 24% described themselves as Republicans, and 44% described themselves as independents or members of another party.
Overall, 48% of all registered voters identify as Democrats or lean Democratic compared with 44% who identify as Republican or lean toward the GOP.
However, they chose to only poll registered voters.
A total of 1,021 adults were interviewed by telephone nationwide by live interviewers calling both landline and cell phones. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Among the entire sample, 32% described themselves
as Democrats, 24% described themselves as Republicans, and 44 % described themselves as independents or members of another party.
All respondents were asked questions concerning basic demographics, and the entire sample was weighted to
reflect national Census figures for gender, race, age, education, region of country, and telephone usage.
Results for the full sample have a margin of sampling error of +/-3.6 percentage points. For the sample of 910 registered voters, it is +/-3.8 percentage points.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: face23785
They didn't though, they specifically went for only registered voters....
...Did anyone read the entire OP before responding? Is it really that long or complicated?
YOU may have written that, but the poll doesn't say that and neither does the portion you quoted. So I ignored it assuming you are incorrect:
Among the entire sample, 32% described themselves as Democrats, 24% described themselves as Republicans, and 44% described themselves as independents or members of another party.
"Describing yourself" as being partisan or an independent doesn't mean you are a registered voter.
If you have a quote saying these were all registered voters -- or that the pollster "went for" registered voters -- please do share it.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: face23785
What percentage of these are Democrats/Republican vs independents leaning Democrat/Republican?
Overall, 48% of all registered voters identify as Democrats or lean Democratic compared with 44% who identify as Republican or lean toward the GOP.
It very well maybe that if you take away the option of "lean" you'll find that the numbers from Pew Research might line up more closely.
However, they chose to only poll registered voters.
That statement is inaccurate. From the SRSS document:
A total of 1,021 adults were interviewed by telephone nationwide by live interviewers calling both landline and cell phones. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Among the entire sample, 32% described themselves
as Democrats, 24% described themselves as Republicans, and 44 % described themselves as independents or members of another party.
All respondents were asked questions concerning basic demographics, and the entire sample was weighted to
reflect national Census figures for gender, race, age, education, region of country, and telephone usage.
Results for the full sample have a margin of sampling error of +/-3.6 percentage points. For the sample of 910 registered voters, it is +/-3.8 percentage points.
910 out of 1,021 identified themselves as registered voters. (I'm assuming they didn't check voter registration, confirm identities of participants and crosscheck)
What they did do though was use the demographic data to weight the responses vs the US Census. It's not clear to me from skimming the document how that weighting was applied. That could be problematic depending on the raw numbers.
An extreme example to illustrate would be say having 1 white respondent and 99 black respondents and then going by demographic data from the census, count that 1 response from a white respondent as 63% and the 99 from black respondents as 19%.
No polling is perfect but it tends to get better with larger data sets. Maybe they should question 10,000 and then randomly choose from among those X amount of responses to perfectly reflect the adult population. Then again, different demographics vote at different rates from election to election. So then maybe you try to weight the results by the voting breakdown from the last election or two.
I don't know that SRSS/CNN did anything inappropriate here. I usually just follow Rasmussen as it's been shown to be the most right-leaning over and over again. That way I'm giving Trump the biggest benefit of the doubt possible.
The most recent Rasmussen presidential approval poll has Trump at 43% approve with a -21 spread on strongly approve/disapprove (27% strongly approve, 48% strongly disapprove).
Do you think those are good numbers?
By comparison, Rasmussen had Obama at this on Nov 7th, 2009:
Approval index: -7 (vs Trump's -21)
Strongly Approve: 31% (vs Trump's 27%)
Strongly Disapprove: 38% (v Trump's 48%)
Total Approve: 49% (vs Trump's 44%)
Total Disapprove: 50% (vs Trump's 56%)
Anyway, polls have shortcomings but they're always more accurate than Donald Trump's personal opinion which seems good enough for the average Trump supporter.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: face23785
They didn't though, they specifically went for only registered voters....
...Did anyone read the entire OP before responding? Is it really that long or complicated?
YOU may have written that, but the poll doesn't say that and neither does the portion you quoted. So I ignored it assuming you are incorrect:
Among the entire sample, 32% described themselves as Democrats, 24% described themselves as Republicans, and 44% described themselves as independents or members of another party.
"Describing yourself" as being partisan or an independent doesn't mean you are a registered voter.
If you have a quote saying these were all registered voters -- or that the pollster "went for" registered voters -- please do share it.
Those are cute semantics, but if they weren't interested in your registration they wouldn't even have asked that question. They may have asked whether you're liberal or conservative, but Republican and Democrat are party affiliations. They're not political ideologies. This is a professional survey, it wasn't some college kids who don't know what these terms mean.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Looking at the amalgamation sites, RCP has him at 38.8. 538 has him at 37.6.
Even Rasmussen, who have been consistently pro-Trump, have him in the low 40s.
You can keep ignoring the facts all you want. The simple truth is that he's a dud. He got elected not for his policies but because the Dems nominated an even more unlikable candidate.